Find Nearby Plumbers In Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Bob Smith Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — punctuality, communication, courteous staff, and responsiveness are mentioned across dozens of reviews spanning nearly two decades. Project completion scores are very strong, with numerous reviewers describing complex tunneling and pipe replacement jobs completed on time, within scope, and with proper permits and inspections. Experience and technical skill are consistently praised, particularly for specialized hydro-excavation and cast iron pipe replacement work, with multiple reviewers noting that the company solved problems others could not. Pricing is generally described as fair and transparent, with several reviewers explicitly noting they were less expensive than competitors and did not upsell unnecessarily. One negative review (1-star, November 2024) describes a no-show appointment and a staff member screaming at the customer, which is a notable outlier that slightly tempers the professionalism score.

• 5 reviews contain no text content — only a star rating (or the word 'unknown'). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• One review (2016-08-14) appears to be a near-verbatim duplicate of another review by the same reviewer (Maureen McNichol). It was counted only once to avoid double-weighting.
• A large cluster of reviews share the same date of 2024-06-09 (approximately 13 reviews). This may reflect a batch import from another platform rather than organic posting, and warrants mild caution, though the content of each review is sufficiently distinct and specific to not suggest fabrication.
• The review corpus spans from 2006 to 2025. Reviews older than 3 years (pre-2022) were given reduced weight in scoring, particularly for pricing, as market conditions and staffing may have changed significantly.
• One 1-star review (2024-11-11) explicitly describes a missed appointment and aggressive phone behavior by a staff member named Monique. This is the only negative review in the entire dataset and was factored into the professionalism score as a meaningful signal despite being a single data point.
• The overwhelming ratio of 5-star reviews (approximately 65 out of 68) with only one 1-star review could suggest some degree of review curation or platform bias, though the specificity and variety of reviewer details across most reviews reduces the likelihood of widespread fabrication.

This WW Score is based on a large, detailed, and largely specific review set spanning multiple years, and carries HIGH overall confidence — however, users should note the single serious negative review regarding a no-show and staff conduct, the cluster of same-date reviews, and the age of a significant portion of the dataset when making hiring decisions.

Mint Plumbing earns strong scores across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of detailed, specific reviews praising punctuality, courtesy, and professionalism from named technicians including Mike, Ramon, and Chuck. Project completion is a standout strength, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting jobs were finished thoroughly, on time, and with follow-through including holiday and emergency calls. Experience scores are high based on consistent praise for technical knowledge, problem-solving, and quality of workmanship — including one case where four prior plumbers had failed. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while the majority of reviewers describe pricing as fair or reasonable, one 2-star review specifically calls out a $600 quote for a tub drain as excessive, which meaningfully tempers the pricing score. Overall, the review base is large, recent, and specific enough to support high confidence across all dimensions.

• Mild concern: The overwhelming majority of reviews are 5-star with very similar positive language (honest, professional, fair pricing, highly recommend). While most reviews include specific names, job details, and unique circumstances that suggest authenticity, the pattern warrants mild scrutiny.
• One review (2023-05-24) contains only a Nextdoor link with no substantive content and was excluded from scoring as it provides no usable data.
• Recency note: Approximately 11 of 27 reviews are from 2021-2022 (older than 24 months as of mid-2024), but the most recent 16 reviews from 2023-2024 are consistent in tone and quality, suggesting no meaningful decline in service.
• Pricing tension: The single 2-star review (2024-07-18) raises a legitimate concern about high pricing for a specific job type. This is the only negative signal in the dataset and was weighted accordingly in the pricing score.

This WW Score is based on 27 reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, recent data, and sufficient specificity to support HIGH confidence — it should be treated as a reliable representation of this contractor's performance, with the caveat that pricing may run above average for certain job types.

Davie Plumbing demonstrates strong technical expertise and professionalism across most dimensions. The business excels in experience and problem-solving, with multiple reviews highlighting Dan's ability to diagnose complex issues and find solutions that competitors missed. Professionalism is consistently praised with mentions of punctuality, communication, and customer service orientation. Project completion is solid with most jobs finished as promised, though one 2019 review noted a cross-connection error and billing dispute that detracted from this dimension. Pricing emerges as the weakest area, with limited mentions but one explicit complaint about being 'pricey' and another about unexpected charges for corrections.

• Recency bias: 7 of 15 reviews are from 2020 or earlier (more than 4 years old). Only 2 reviews from past 12 months. Recent performance may differ from historical data.
• One negative review (2019, 2-star) explicitly contradicts the overwhelmingly positive pattern, citing surly attitude, installation error (cross-connected hot/cold), and refusal to correct without additional charge. This suggests inconsistent service quality or staff variability.
• Pricing dimension has limited mentions (3 total). Two reviews mention 'pricey' or 'expensive' but also acknowledge value through rare parts availability. One positive mention of 'very good price' for tool rental. Insufficient data for high-confidence pricing assessment.
• Multiple reviews mention Dan/Dano by name and reference the business as a parts supplier rather than primarily a service provider. Some reviews conflate parts sales with installation services, which may skew experience scores.
• No fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary in length, specificity, and tone. Positive reviews include concrete details (cartridge identification, pipe schematic, tool rental). The single negative review is detailed and credible.

This WW Score of 87.2 is reliable for assessing technical expertise and professionalism based on substantial evidence, but should be treated with caution regarding pricing fairness due to limited mentions and recency concerns given that most reviews predate 2021. The 2019 negative review suggests service quality may be inconsistent depending on which technician is assigned.

Honest Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism and experience. The company excels in punctuality, communication, and technical knowledge, as evidenced by 142 mentions of professional conduct and 127 mentions of skilled workmanship. Pricing is consistently described as fair and reasonable, though a small number of reviews cite overpricing concerns. Project completion is generally reliable, though a handful of negative reviews mention scheduling failures and incomplete follow-through. The WW Score of 84.2 reflects a trustworthy contractor with solid execution, though not without occasional service lapses.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple reviews from 2025-05-26 and 2025-05-10 contain suspiciously generic praise with minimal detail ('Skilled Professionals', empty text fields, repetitive 5-star ratings with no substantive content). These appear clustered and lack specificity typical of genuine customer feedback.
• RECENCY BIAS: Approximately 40% of reviews are from 2025 (past 6 months), creating potential skew toward recent positive sentiment. Older reviews (2012-2019) show more balanced mix of positive and negative feedback.
• NEGATIVE OUTLIERS: 8 reviews with ratings of 1.0-2.0 cite serious issues including: water damage from negligence (2024-12-11), failure to show up for scheduled appointments (2024-09-25, 2022-08-22), non-responsiveness to callbacks (2020-02-11, 2019-05-13, 2018-02-19, 2018-02-15), and overpricing concerns (2017-08-02). These represent ~3.4% of total reviews but indicate systemic issues with reliability and communication.
• MULTIPLE BUSINESS ENTITIES: Reviews reference 'Honest Plumbing' (Aaron/Tim/Joe), 'A Topping Plumbing' (Jermaine), and 'Ted's Plumbing' as related or merged entities. This complicates score interpretation as different teams may have different quality standards.
• INCONSISTENT QUALITY BY TECHNICIAN: Named technicians (Tim, Aaron, Joe, Jermaine, Anthony) receive consistently high praise, but unnamed technicians and some specific individuals (Darrel, unnamed plumber in 2024-12-11 incident) receive criticism, suggesting quality varies significantly by staff member.

This WW Score of 84.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH confidence for general contractor selection, but potential customers should be aware that recent reviews show clustering of generic praise that may inflate the score, and a small but meaningful subset of reviews document serious failures in scheduling, communication, and accountability. The company's performance appears highly dependent on which technician is assigned; requesting specific named technicians (Tim, Aaron, Joe, or Jermaine) may improve outcomes. Customers should confirm appointment details in writing and establish clear communication protocols before work begins.

Veterans Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 89 mentions highlighting punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness. Project completion is solid with 78 mentions showing reliable follow-through and quality work. Experience is well-documented with 68 mentions of skilled technicians and effective problem-solving. Pricing receives 52 mentions and scores slightly lower, reflecting some customer concerns about cost on basic jobs, though most reviews praise fair and competitive rates. The company shows consistent excellence with named technicians (Ian, Hasib, Scott, Toven, etc.) receiving repeated praise.

• Duplicate review detected: Two nearly identical reviews from 2024-06-25 about John's water softener installation and Ian's professional service. This suggests possible review duplication rather than fake reviews.
• Negative outliers present: 5 reviews with ratings of 1-2 stars (2024-09-12 faucet seal issue, 2024-08-20 missed quote, 2023-11-16 mobile home refusal, 2023-10-23 slow drain diagnosis, 2019-04-26 drain weasel overcharge, 2018-12-07 rude technician, 2021-06-30 insurance claim issue, 2014-11-17 office staff issues). These are legitimate complaints with specific details and should not be dismissed.
• Recency note: Majority of reviews (approximately 70%) are from 2021 onwards, with strong concentration in 2024-2025. Reviews older than 2015 are sparse. This provides good current data.
• Service area inconsistency: One 1-star review (2023-11-16) explicitly states the company refuses service to mobile home residents despite customer being a veteran. This is a significant policy issue that contradicts the company's veteran-focused mission.
• Quality control variance: While most reviews praise specific technicians by name, the negative reviews suggest inconsistent service quality depending on which technician is assigned or which department (office vs. field) handles the interaction.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable, based on 125 reviews with strong data across all four dimensions (52-89 mentions each). The company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and project completion, though pricing concerns and documented service refusals to certain customer types (mobile homes) warrant caution. The score reflects a solid, experienced contractor with generally excellent field technicians but occasional office/management issues and rare instances of poor workmanship or unprofessional behavior.

Cohen Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions, with particular strengths in professionalism and technical expertise. The business excels at punctuality, communication, and customer service, with extensive evidence of responsive scheduling, courteous staff, and clear explanations of work. Experience scores are consistently high, reflecting Nicky's master plumber credentials and problem-solving ability. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and competitive, though a few reviews note higher costs. Project completion shows solid performance with most jobs finished on schedule, though three negative reviews highlight scheduling delays and one significant service failure involving an incomplete diagnosis that caused substantial damage. The family-run operation (Nicky and Stacey) receives widespread praise for integrity and customer-first approach.

• Three negative reviews (1-star ratings) warrant attention: (1) June 2024 review citing rude management and slow service; (2) November 2023 review describing failure to schedule a water heater replacement despite multiple follow-ups; (3) January 2019 review describing incomplete diagnosis of a leak that resulted in $900+ in additional repairs and neighbor damage. These suggest occasional service failures and communication breakdowns despite overwhelmingly positive reviews.
• Review distribution is heavily skewed toward 5-star ratings (73 of 80 reviews). While this may reflect genuine customer satisfaction, the concentration of perfect scores with minimal critical detail in some reviews could indicate selection bias or review platform dynamics rather than fake reviews per se.
• Most reviews are older than 12 months (approximately 65% predate 2023). Recent reviews (past 12 months) show mixed signals: strong praise alongside the June 2024 management complaint and November 2023 scheduling failure. Recency-weighted analysis suggests some deterioration in service consistency.
• One review explicitly mentions 'unknown' text content, reducing data quality slightly.

This WW Score of 84.2 is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH confidence across all four dimensions based on substantial mention counts (28-62 reviews per dimension). However, the score reflects a business with genuine strengths in professionalism and expertise offset by documented project completion failures and recent customer service issues; potential customers should be aware that while Cohen Plumbing has earned strong long-term reputation, recent negative experiences suggest occasional lapses in scheduling reliability and diagnostic accuracy.