Find Nearby Plumbers In Providence, Rhode Island

The reviews for Carbone Plumbing and Heating paint a consistently negative picture across nearly all dimensions. Pricing is the most heavily criticized area, with multiple reviewers describing unexplained overcharges, quotes not honored, inflated parts markups, and billing math that does not add up — resulting in a very low score of 10. Professionalism fares nearly as poorly, with multiple accounts of rude, curt, or verbally abusive behavior from both technicians and office staff. Project completion is also severely impacted, with at least one reviewer explicitly stating the job was never finished and the work area left in a mess. The single positive review, which praised responsiveness and workmanship on an unusual job, provides a small upward signal on experience, but it is heavily outweighed by accounts of misdiagnosis, incorrect wiring, and inability to complete tasks.

• RECENCY WARNING: The one positive review (5-star) is dated December 2017, making it over 6 years old. All negative reviews span 2016–2021. The most recent reviews are uniformly negative, which is a significant concern.
• PATTERN WARNING: The single positive review is notably vague and brief compared to the detailed negative reviews. It lacks specifics about pricing or technician names, which slightly reduces its reliability, though it does mention a specific unusual job type.
• PRICING INTEGRITY FLAG: Multiple independent reviewers describe billing discrepancies — including math errors on invoices, quotes not honored, and parts marked up significantly above retail. This pattern across 5+ reviews suggests a systemic pricing practice rather than isolated incidents.
• CONDUCT FLAG: At least two reviews describe verbally abusive or rude behavior from the owner or office staff when customers called to dispute charges. This is a serious professionalism concern.
• INCOMPLETE WORK FLAG: One reviewer explicitly states the technician left without finishing the job and left the work area in a poor state. A second reviewer had to call another company to correct wiring done incorrectly by Carbone.

This WW Score is based on 7 reviews with a moderate total volume, but the consistency and specificity of the negative feedback across pricing, professionalism, and project completion gives the low score reasonable reliability — the pattern is clear and corroborated by multiple independent accounts.

Guy Clermont receives an extremely low WW Score of 8.5 based on overwhelmingly negative feedback across all dimensions. Every single review rates him 1 star and documents severe failures in project completion, including abandoned jobs, missed appointments, and unresponsive communication. Professionalism is consistently criticized—customers report dishonesty, sarcasm, evasiveness, and failure to return calls. Technical competence is questioned in multiple reviews detailing poor workmanship (incorrect ductwork installation, failed HVAC systems, incomplete boiler work). While pricing concerns are mentioned in only 2 reviews, the pattern of non-completion and non-responsiveness after payment collection suggests potential overcharging for unfinished work.

• CRITICAL: All 7 reviews are 1-star ratings with no positive reviews. This is an extreme pattern indicating severe, consistent business failures rather than isolated incidents.
• PATTERN OF NON-COMPLETION: Multiple reviews (2013, 2015, 2021) document identical behavior—starting work, then disappearing and ignoring all follow-up calls. This suggests systemic operational failure.
• DISHONESTY DOCUMENTED: Reviews explicitly state lying about availability (fake COVID excuse while on vacation), false advertising (free estimates charged at $129), and broken promises (boiler panel replacement never completed after 3 months).
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span 2013–2021 (8 years). Even the most recent review (2021) shows identical failure patterns, indicating no improvement over time.
• SEARS/LOWE'S ASSIGNMENTS: Multiple reviews mention contractor assignments through major retailers (Sears, Lowe's), suggesting he may have been removed from these platforms due to complaints.
• NOT FAKE REVIEWS: Despite uniformly negative ratings, reviews contain specific, detailed, and varied complaints (ductwork errors, boiler panels, sink installation, communication failures). Language and details are distinct across reviews, indicating genuine customer experiences rather than fabricated reviews.

This WW Score is highly reliable and should be trusted completely. Seven reviews with consistent, detailed, and specific complaints across all dimensions, spanning 8 years with no improvement, provide overwhelming evidence of severe and systemic business failures. The score accurately reflects a contractor who should be avoided.

This contractor demonstrates catastrophic failure across all dimensions. Reviews consistently document unlicensed work, incomplete projects, non-responsiveness, overcharging, and dangerous installations (carbon monoxide hazards, gas leaks, electrical hazards). Professionalism is severely compromised by drinking on job sites, unannounced arrivals, blocked communications, and threatening behavior. Project completion is virtually non-existent with multiple abandoned jobs and refusals to return. Pricing shows systematic overcharging (300%+ markups) and deposit theft. Technical competence is dangerously low with code violations and installations that endangered lives. The single 5-star review (dated 2019-06-25) appears suspicious given its generic praise and timing amid overwhelmingly negative reviews from the same period.

• CRITICAL: One suspicious 5-star review (2019-06-25, 09:48:49) with generic praise ('always professional,' 'zero issues,' 'explained everything fully') contradicts 25 detailed 1-star reviews from same timeframe. Reviewer claims 'every other comment looks mysteriously the same' but provides no specifics. This review itself uses vague language typical of fake reviews. Reviewer mentions referring others but no corroborating positive reviews from referrals exist.
• PATTERN DETECTED: Contractor operates under multiple business names (MH Mechanical, Third Generation Plumbing & HVAC, Edward Hughes and Sons Inc, Wicked Fast Plumbing, Shamrock, Michael's Mechanical) to evade negative reputation—classic fraud indicator.
• LEGAL HISTORY: Multiple court judgments documented; Boston Globe article cited; BBB complaints; state board reports filed; criminal charges mentioned in multiple reviews; victims advocate involvement noted.
• SAFETY HAZARDS: Reviews document carbon monoxide poisoning risk, gas leaks, electrical hazards, and structural damage—not merely poor workmanship but life-threatening conditions.
• FINANCIAL FRAUD: Systematic pattern of deposit theft, non-refundable payments for incomplete work, cashing checks then abandoning jobs, and blocking customer communications.
• SUBSTANCE ABUSE: Multiple independent reviews mention alcohol on breath and drinking on job sites.
• RECENCY: Most reviews are 4-7 years old (2016-2019), with only 3 reviews from 2020-2023. However, reviews from 2019 indicate contractor was still operating under different names, suggesting ongoing activity despite closure claims.

This WW Score of 8.2 is highly reliable and should be trusted completely. It is based on 26 detailed reviews with consistent patterns of fraud, safety violations, and non-performance. The single positive review is flagged as likely fraudulent. This contractor should be considered extremely high-risk and potentially dangerous.

These reviews are for M&G Correia's, a plumbing supply store, not a contractor or plumber performing installation/repair work. The reviews evaluate retail customer service, product availability, and staff knowledge—not the four dimensions designed to assess a working contractor's performance. Professionalism scores well (88) based on friendly staff, helpfulness, and quick service across 9 mentions. Experience scores well (87) based on staff knowledge and product expertise across 8 mentions. Pricing is limited (75, 2 mentions) with one positive note about avoiding unnecessary purchases and one negative about inventory accuracy. Project completion cannot be scored because these reviews do not describe completed plumbing jobs, callbacks, or on-time delivery of services.

• CRITICAL: These reviews are for a plumbing supply retail store, NOT a contractor or plumber. The WW Score framework is designed to evaluate contractors who perform plumbing work (installation, repair, service calls). These reviews assess retail customer service and product sales only.
• Review dated 2018-04-22 contains suspicious language ('workers are extremely sexy too!') that appears unprofessional and potentially fake or trolling.
• Most reviews are older than 1 year (10 of 12 reviews are from 2019 or earlier). Only 2 reviews are from 2021 or later, limiting recency.
• Review dated 2021-05-05 is about a washer/dryer purchase, not plumbing services—completely off-topic.
• Cannot calculate WW Score because this business does not perform the type of work the scoring framework measures (contractor plumbing services).

This WW Score cannot be reliably calculated or applied because M&G Correia's is a plumbing supply retailer, not a contractor performing plumbing work; the framework is designed to evaluate working contractors on job completion, punctuality, and service delivery, none of which apply to retail transactions.

This dataset exhibits severe internal contradiction and strong indicators of fake reviews that prevent reliable scoring. Four recent reviews (2021) contain generic, repetitive praise with identical phrasing patterns ('best,' 'professional,' 'reasonable prices') and lack specific details. Two detailed negative reviews (2023, 2022) describe serious misconduct including threats, ghosting, unprofessional behavior, and poor workmanship. The stark polarity and stylistic differences suggest the positive reviews may be fabricated. Given this conflict, no composite WW Score can be calculated responsibly.

• CRITICAL: Strong evidence of fake positive reviews. Four 5-star reviews from 2021 use nearly identical language ('best,' 'professional,' 'reasonable prices,' 'highly recommend') with no specific details about actual work performed.
• CRITICAL: Two detailed 1-star reviews (2023, 2022) describe serious misconduct: threats of property damage, ghosting after payment, unprofessional behavior on job site, poor workmanship, and disrespectful conduct. These are specific and credible.
• SEVERE POLARITY: 4 five-star generic reviews vs. 2 one-star detailed reviews with no middle ground suggests manipulation or two completely different service experiences.
• RECENCY ISSUE: Positive reviews are 2-3 years old (2021); negative reviews are more recent (2022-2023), suggesting service quality has deteriorated or positive reviews are historical fabrications.
• PROFESSIONALISM CONCERNS: Negative reviews cite threats, disrespect, unprofessional language, substance use on job, and dismissive attitude toward customers.
• PAYMENT/PRICING RED FLAGS: Aggressive payment demands, threats tied to non-payment, inflated flat estimates, aggressive tipping prompts, and ghosting after payment received.

This score cannot be reliably calculated due to apparent review manipulation and irreconcilable contradictions. The positive reviews show hallmarks of fabrication (generic language, lack of specifics, clustering), while the negative reviews are detailed and credible. Any WW Score derived from this dataset would be meaningless. Recommend manual investigation and customer verification before engaging this contractor.

This business demonstrates severe and consistent deficiencies across all dimensions. While one positive review (2023-08-21) praised professionalism and service quality, four subsequent reviews document serious problems: unprofessional conduct during hiring interviews, failure to complete work adequately, massive price discrepancies ($980 quoted vs $2200 charged), property damage ($4000+ sink replacement), non-responsiveness to complaints, and abusive behavior toward job candidates. The owner's conduct in hiring interviews was particularly egregious, involving inappropriate personal questions, age bias, boundary violations, and emotional manipulation. The single positive review cannot offset the overwhelming pattern of documented failures.

• CRITICAL: Four of five reviews (80%) are 1-star ratings documenting severe misconduct, property damage, and harassment. This is not a pattern of isolated complaints but systemic failure.
• PRICING FRAUD ALERT: Review from 2023-03-21 documents quote of $980 with final charge of $2200 (125% overcharge) with no authorization for increase.
• PROPERTY DAMAGE: Documented destruction of new stainless steel sink ($4000+ replacement cost) and wall sconces due to use of abrasive materials on delicate surfaces.
• HIRING MISCONDUCT: Two reviews (2023-03-05 and 2022-06-10) document discriminatory hiring practices, age bias, inappropriate personal questions, and emotional harassment during interviews.
• NON-RESPONSIVENESS: Multiple reviews document owner failure to respond to complaints, emails, and pictures of poor work quality.
• WORK QUALITY: Documented instances of incomplete work (bathrooms not cleaned in post-construction cleaning), inadequate vacuuming on deep clean, and property damage.
• The single positive review (2023-08-21) stands in stark contrast to all others and cannot be weighted equally given the severity and consistency of documented failures in subsequent reviews.

This score cannot be reliably calculated due to insufficient positive data and the presence of severe, documented misconduct. The overwhelming preponderance of evidence (80% 1-star reviews documenting fraud, property damage, harassment, and non-responsiveness) indicates this business poses significant risk to customers and employees. Any engagement with this service should be considered high-risk.