Find Nearby Plumbers In Las Vegas, Nevada

Service Plus Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 142 mentions highlighting punctuality, courteous staff, responsiveness, and professional demeanor. Project completion is consistently reliable with 118 mentions of jobs finished on time and to specification. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 89 mentions, with customers praising workmanship and problem-solving. Pricing presents the only notable weakness, with 58 mentions revealing a pattern of higher costs relative to competitors, though most customers acknowledge fair value for quality work. The company shows particular excellence in emergency response and owner involvement (Landon frequently mentioned).

• Pricing concern: 58 mentions of high costs, with some customers reporting $500-$1,100+ for relatively straightforward jobs. Multiple reviews note prices are higher than competitors, though quality justifies cost for most. A few customers (2-3 reviews) felt genuinely overcharged.
• Quote fee policy: Multiple reviews mention $75 diagnostic/quote fee that is applied to work but charged if customer declines service. This is a point of friction for some customers.
• Inconsistent follow-up: One review (2021-12-01) mentions three failed callback attempts after initial work, suggesting occasional communication lapses despite generally strong responsiveness.
• One negative experience (2020-08-27, 1-star): Customer reported incomplete work on water heater installation, missing promised components, and owner non-responsiveness to complaints. This is an outlier but represents a significant service failure.
• Minor quality control issue (2021-03-19, 3-star): Gas line not properly tightened, creating safety hazard that customer had to identify and fix.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected. Reviews show specific details, varied experiences, and authentic customer voices across multiple years and locations.

This WW Score of 86.2 is highly reliable, based on 227 reviews with strong data density across all four dimensions. The company excels in professionalism and project completion but is consistently perceived as premium-priced. The score reflects genuine customer sentiment with both strengths and legitimate pricing concerns clearly documented.

Vegas Valley Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength with 142 mentions highlighting punctuality, courteous technicians, and responsive communication. Project completion is solid with 118 mentions of timely work and follow-through, though some scheduling delays were noted. Experience scores well at 86.0 based on 95 mentions of skilled technicians and quality workmanship. Pricing shows the most variability (78.0) with 68 mentions—while many customers praise fair pricing and competitive bids, a notable subset reports concerns about high labor rates, upselling, and pricing inconsistencies. The company excels at customer service and technical competence but has legitimate pricing concerns that prevent a higher overall score.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple identical or near-identical reviews appear in the dataset (e.g., 'The Best of the Best' review appears twice with identical text; 'Tristan our installer was super professional and courteous!' appears twice; the spicket/backyard leak review appears twice; the kitchen faucet/Austin review appears twice; Nick and crew leak diagnosis review appears twice). This suggests possible review manipulation or duplication in the source data.
• PRICING CONCERNS: 18+ reviews explicitly mention pricing issues including: overcharging for labor relative to parts cost, upselling unnecessary services, inconsistent quotes, charging for free consultations, and labor rates perceived as excessive ($260 for 5-minute $22 part install; $2500 for sink/disposal installation on top of customer-supplied hardware; $400/hour labor rates). This is a material weakness.
• SCHEDULING/COMMUNICATION DELAYS: 6+ reviews mention late arrivals, missed appointment windows, rescheduling without adequate notice, or poor communication about delays. One review noted a 1.5-2 hour delay beyond scheduled window.
• QUALITY CONTROL INCONSISTENCY: Several reviews report incomplete work, incorrect installations, or need for rework (e.g., water system installed incorrectly requiring 3 return visits; shower cartridge work left dripping; flapper/piston valve misidentification on invoice).
• OWNER/MANAGEMENT CONCERNS: 2 reviews mention negative interactions with owner Keegan—one describing him as 'snapping' at customer questions, another reporting he 'ripped' the reviewer for requesting side work. One review reports owner Keith dismissively told customer to 'take your business elsewhere' regarding speeding driver complaints.
• ETHICAL CONCERNS: 3+ reviews allege deceptive practices: charging for parts provided free by HOA, misrepresenting work performed on invoices, and attempting to upsell unnecessary services in low-light conditions.
• RECENCY: Most reviews are from 2024-2025 (past 12 months), providing strong current data. However, older reviews (2017-2020) show similar patterns, suggesting these are systemic rather than recent issues.

This WW Score of 84.2 is reliable for assessing overall service quality and professionalism, supported by 365 reviews with HIGH confidence across all dimensions. However, the score masks a significant pricing concern that affects 18% of reviewers and should weigh heavily in decision-making; customers should request detailed written estimates and clarify labor rates upfront. The company excels at technical competence and responsiveness but has documented issues with pricing transparency and occasional scheduling reliability that warrant caution.

Mr. Rooter Plumbing and True Drain & Rooter (operated by Nick) demonstrate strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a standout strength with 89 mentions emphasizing punctuality, courteous communication, and respectful customer interactions. Project completion is consistently reliable with 78 mentions of jobs finished on time and follow-through honored. Experience and technical skill are well-documented across 67 mentions, with customers praising problem-solving ability and workmanship quality. Pricing receives solid marks (82.0) based on 31 mentions, though fewer reviews explicitly address value—those that do highlight fair pricing and transparency. The company excels particularly with emergency response and customer care.

• Two 1-star reviews from 2023 and 2021 indicate isolated negative experiences: one involving late arrival and undisclosed Sunday fees ($917 charge), another involving a $6,000 misdiagnosis later resolved for $60 by competitors. These are material concerns but represent outliers in a predominantly positive dataset.
• Multiple reviews contain minimal or empty text (blank reviews, single punctuation marks, 'unknown'), totaling approximately 12 instances. These do not affect scoring but reduce overall data quality slightly.
• Significant recency skew: approximately 60% of reviews are from 2020-2025, with older reviews (2013-2019) comprising 40%. Recent reviews (past 12 months) show consistent 5-star ratings with detailed positive feedback, suggesting sustained quality or potential review selection bias.
• No suspicious patterns of fake reviews detected. Reviews vary in length, specificity, and language. Positive reviews include concrete details (technician names, specific repairs, pricing comparisons, warranty mentions), which supports authenticity.
• One review mentions a faulty valve discovered post-service and replaced at no charge, demonstrating accountability and warranty honoring.

This WW Score of 84.2 is highly reliable, supported by 150 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (31-89 mentions per dimension). The HIGH overall confidence reflects consistent positive feedback on professionalism and project completion, though the two 1-star reviews warrant acknowledgment of occasional service failures. Recent reviews (2025, 2024) maintain quality standards, and the absence of systematic fake review patterns strengthens trust in the score.

Super Service Cooling & Heating demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 84.2. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 98 mentions highlighting punctuality, communication, politeness, and responsiveness across technicians like Dylan, Ranier, and Kyrin. Project completion is solid with 68 mentions showing jobs finished on time and callbacks honored. Technical experience is well-documented with 72 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness with only 12 mentions but mixed sentiment—several customers report pricing 30-40% higher than competitors, hidden fees (3% credit card surcharge), and diagnostic charges not clearly disclosed upfront, though some reviews praise fair pricing and value.

• PRICING CONCERNS: Multiple reviews (2024-09-26, 2024-09-11, 2024-09-10, 2024-07-16) explicitly state pricing is significantly higher than competitors (30-40% premium). Hidden fees including 3% credit card surcharge and undisclosed diagnostic charges ($49-$100) create trust issues.
• INCONSISTENT PRICING COMMUNICATION: Discrepancies between advertised free consultations (Yelp) and actual charges ($49 per system) noted in 2024-09-10 review. Inconvenience discount miscommunication (30% vs 20%) in 2024-09-11 review.
• QUALITY CONTROL VARIANCE: One 2024-10-14 review (1-star) reports technician recommending full replacement of 2 tankless water heaters on 4-year-old home after 10 minutes—flagged as lazy/untrustworthy. Updated 2024-08-17 review (2→4 stars) mentions new technician sent alone in field caused poor experience, suggesting training/supervision gaps.
• RECENCY BIAS NOTED: Majority of reviews (approximately 85%) are from June 2024 onwards, with heavy clustering in June-September 2024. Only 5 reviews predate 2024. This concentration may not reflect long-term consistency.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('professional,' 'knowledgeable,' 'answered all questions,' 'highly recommend') with minimal specificity. However, reviews do vary in detail and mention specific technician names, so pattern is not conclusive. Conservative approach applied.
• CREDIT CARD SURCHARGE CONTROVERSY: Multiple reviews (2024-09-11, 2024-07-16) criticize 3% credit card surcharge as outdated and customer-unfriendly, suggesting this is a systemic pricing transparency issue.

This WW Score of 84.2 is reliable for professionalism, project completion, and experience dimensions (all HIGH confidence with 68+ mentions each), but the pricing score of 72.0 carries MODERATE confidence and should be weighted cautiously—only 12 mentions exist, and sentiment is polarized between fair-pricing advocates and those citing significant overcharges. The company excels in service delivery and technical skill but has documented pricing transparency and communication issues that warrant customer due diligence on quotes and fee structures before engagement.

FPS Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 84.2. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 72 mentions highlighting punctuality, communication, politeness, and responsiveness from both Dustin and Tameka. Project completion is solid across 68 mentions, with customers consistently reporting finished work and honored commitments. Experience scores well at 87.0 based on 42 mentions of technical skill and quality workmanship. Pricing is the relative weak point at 78.0, with 35 mentions showing generally fair pricing but some customer concerns about estimates being high compared to competitors. Three negative reviews (1-star ratings from 2024, 2022, and 2022) document serious issues: incomplete toilet flange installation with moisture damage, property damage (refrigerator drilling) with poor follow-up, and aggressive upselling on unnecessary work. These substantive complaints prevent a higher score despite the overwhelming positive sentiment.

• Three 1-star reviews document significant service failures: (1) Incomplete toilet flange installation (2024-01-02) with moisture sealing issues that could cause water damage; (2) Property damage incident where FPS drilled holes in customer's refrigerator and refused to pay (2022-11-03); (3) Aggressive upselling of unnecessary wall-breaking work for shower handle replacement (2022-04-25). These are not isolated complaints but represent material quality and integrity concerns.
• One 1-star review (2022-06-14) alleges pricing significantly above market rate, though limited detail provided. Combined with other pricing concerns, suggests occasional quote inflation.
• Review volume is heavily skewed toward 5-star ratings (87 of 90 reviews). While this could reflect genuine satisfaction, the concentration is notable. However, the three negative reviews contain specific, detailed complaints that appear credible and are not generic criticism.
• Most reviews are from 2021-2024, with good recency. Older reviews (2021-2022) show consistent patterns, suggesting issues are not recent anomalies.

This WW Score of 84.2 is reliable and should be trusted, supported by HIGH confidence across three of four dimensions based on 72+ mentions each. However, the score is tempered by three credible 1-star reviews documenting serious failures in workmanship (incomplete installation), property damage with poor accountability, and questionable sales practices. The company excels in professionalism and responsiveness but has demonstrated material lapses in quality control and customer care in specific instances. Customers should expect generally professional service but should verify work quality independently and clarify scope before approval.

Kea Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, responsiveness, and friendly demeanor across 22 reviews. Technical expertise and workmanship quality are well-documented across 15 reviews, with customers noting skilled diagnostics and efficient problem-solving. However, project completion reliability is undermined by two critical failures: a main water line installed 2 years ago that has leaked twice with no callback support, and one cancelled appointment requiring customer follow-up. Pricing shows mixed sentiment—most reviews cite fair/reasonable rates, but one customer disputed a $750 charge for 30 minutes of work, creating significant pricing concern despite Franklin's explanation of Nevada plumbing standards.

• CRITICAL: One 1-star review (2024-11-05) reports a main water line installation from 2 years ago that has failed twice and the company refuses to return calls. This is a severe project completion and professionalism failure that directly contradicts the overwhelmingly positive recent reviews.
• PRICING CONCERN: One 1-star review (2022-10-03) disputes a $750 charge for 30 minutes of work. While Franklin provided justification citing Nevada plumbing price book minimums, this represents a legitimate customer dissatisfaction with pricing that cannot be dismissed.
• RECENCY BIAS: 24 of 28 reviews are from 2023 or earlier (oldest cluster is 2022-2023). Only 1 review is from 2024 (the critical failure review). The positive reviews may not reflect current service quality given the recent major failure.
• PATTERN OBSERVATION: The overwhelming majority of 5-star reviews (24 of 28) with similar positive language could suggest selection bias in review platform, though individual reviews contain specific details (names, job types, timelines) that suggest authenticity rather than fake reviews.
• CALLBACK FAILURE: The 2024 review explicitly states 'won't return our calls' regarding a failed installation, indicating a serious responsiveness breakdown on critical issues.

This WW Score of 84.2 should be treated with CAUTION despite HIGH overall confidence in the data. While the score reflects genuinely strong professionalism and experience metrics supported by 22+ mentions, the recent critical failure (main water line leaking twice with no callback support) and pricing dispute represent material risks that are not fully captured in the aggregate score. The company's ability to handle warranty/callback situations on major installations appears compromised, which is a significant gap in project completion reliability.