Find Nearby Plumbers In Salt Lake City, Utah

Smedley's demonstrates strong professionalism with consistently praised technicians, responsive communication, and courteous service across 10 reviews. Project completion is solid but tempered by one significant failure (missed appointment, incomplete work) and one warranty labor charge complaint, bringing that dimension to 78.0. Technical expertise is well-documented with 8 mentions of skilled diagnostics and quality workmanship. Pricing is the weakest dimension at 72.5—while most customers find value reasonable, two reviews explicitly cite higher-than-market costs and warranty labor charges that competitors cover. The company's family-owned reputation and willingness to stand behind work (free motor replacement after 3 years) adds credibility.

• RECENCY CONCERN: 8 of 12 reviews are from 2017 or earlier (oldest from 2015). Only 4 reviews from 2018-2021. This limits confidence in current service quality.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Two reviews mention being 'a little pricey' and one explicitly states they were charged $400+ for labor warranty that competitors cover. This suggests pricing may not be as competitive as other dimensions.
• PROJECT COMPLETION RED FLAG: One 1-star review (2016) documents a serious failure—missed appointment, incomplete work, 3-day delay for basic materials. This is a material negative that significantly impacts the project completion score.
• POTENTIAL REVIEW BIAS: 9 of 12 reviews are 5-star ratings. The two 1-star reviews are substantive complaints, but the high proportion of 5-star reviews with enthusiastic language (e.g., 'rockstar,' 'beast,' 'can't go wrong') may indicate some selection bias in review collection.

This WW Score of 82.3 should be treated with moderate caution due to review age (most data from 2015-2018) and a documented project completion failure, though the HIGH confidence across three dimensions is supported by consistent positive mentions of professionalism and experience. Current service quality may differ from historical reviews.

A Perfect Plumber earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism and experience being the most frequently praised attributes — punctuality, friendliness, clear communication, and technical competence appear consistently across dozens of reviews spanning nearly 15 years. Pricing is generally regarded as fair and competitive, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting costs came in well below competitor quotes, though one reviewer flagged a part being marked up significantly above retail. Project completion is the most penalized dimension: while the majority of jobs were completed satisfactorily, there are credible negative reviews describing abandoned or incomplete work, a botched tub installation, a shoddy tile remodel that required full replacement, and at least one instance of a technician being unable to finish a job and referring out — all of which meaningfully drag this score down. The negative reviews, while a minority, are detailed and specific enough to be treated as credible signals rather than outliers, preventing the score from reaching the high 80s or 90s.

• 24 reviews contain no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence. They do not inflate any dimension score.
• The review dated 2016-08-28 contains only the word 'unknown' and was treated as no usable data.
• Several reviews are highly generic (e.g., 'Great service!', 'Highly recommend!', 'These guys are still great!') with no specific details. These were counted toward overall review volume but not used to score individual dimensions.
• The review corpus spans from 2009 to 2025. Reviews older than 12 months (i.e., before June 2024) represent the majority of the dataset. The most recent 12 months (June 2024–June 2025) contain approximately 35 reviews, which are weighted more heavily. Older reviews, while informative for trend context, carry reduced weight.
• Three separate 1-star reviews (2018-01-02, 2021-06-10, 2024-01-10) describe incomplete work, poor workmanship, and failure to honor guarantees on remodel or rough-in projects. These are detailed, specific, and credible — they materially reduce the project_completion score.
• One 1-star review (2018-04-25) describes a plumber being unable to handle a leak detection job and the office being rude when the customer called back for help — this negatively impacts both professionalism and project_completion scores.
• One 1-star review (2017-07-27) describes the plumber arriving late, overcharging for a part, and leaving used towels on a clean dish area — this negatively impacts the professionalism and pricing scores.
• One 1-star review (2024-06-09) describes the company asking for photos and then going silent — this negatively impacts the professionalism score.
• One 2-star review (2023-06-10) describes a warranty issue handled poorly, with the owner appearing indifferent to the customer being without hot water — this negatively impacts project_completion and professionalism scores.
• One 1-star review (2019-06-05) describes passive-aggressive and unprofessional behavior from office staff — this negatively impacts the professionalism score.
• One 1-star review (2014-07-25) describes a cancelled appointment with no follow-through — this negatively impacts project_completion and professionalism scores.
• No strong fake review patterns detected. Most positive reviews include specific technician names, job descriptions, and situational details, which is a positive authenticity signal. The volume of blank or generic reviews is noted but not flagged as coordinated manipulation.

This WW Score is based on 125 reviews with high mention counts across all four dimensions and is considered HIGH confidence overall; however, the presence of multiple detailed, credible negative reviews — particularly around project completion and office professionalism — means prospective customers should read the critical reviews carefully before hiring for large or complex projects.

Walton Plumbing Heating and Air demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 62 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, friendly demeanor, and courteous service. Pricing receives consistent praise for fairness and transparency, with 28 mentions noting competitive rates and honest assessments that often save customers money. Experience is well-documented with 41 mentions of skilled workmanship, technical knowledge, and problem-solving ability. Project completion shows solid performance (79.2) but with slightly more variability—while most jobs are completed on time and thoroughly, a few negative reviews mention scheduling issues and one significant bathroom remodel failure. The company's 20+ year track record and loyal customer base support the high scores.

• One severe negative review (1.0 rating, 2015-06-12) describes major bathroom remodel failures including improper shower pan installation, broken door, and inexperienced tiler. This is a significant outlier suggesting potential quality control issues on complex remodeling projects.
• Two negative reviews (1.0 ratings from 2020-07-20 and 2018-06-11) cite poor responsiveness and scheduling issues, indicating inconsistent follow-through despite strong overall professionalism scores.
• One negative review (1.0 rating, 2018-08-08) alleges snide/dismissive attitude toward female customer regarding brand choice, raising potential interpersonal professionalism concerns.
• One negative review (1.0 rating, 2017-09-27) criticizes customer service for refusing fall AC installation quote.
• Multiple reviews from 2010-2013 have rating values of 0.0 (likely data entry errors or platform issues), but review text is positive. These were included in analysis but represent data quality concerns.
• High concentration of 5-star reviews (approximately 75% of dataset) with some generic praise ('Jonny was awesome', 'really enjoying the tankless system!') suggests possible review platform bias, though specific details in majority of reviews support authenticity.
• Most recent reviews (2024-2025) are uniformly 5-star with minimal detail, which could indicate recent reputation management efforts.

This WW Score of 82.1 is highly reliable due to large sample size (89 reviews) and consistent data across all dimensions with 5+ mentions each. However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that the company shows strong performance in routine HVAC and plumbing work but may have quality control vulnerabilities in complex remodeling projects; customers should verify experience with their specific project type before engaging.

Goff Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, and courteous staff across 42 reviews. Technical expertise and workmanship quality are well-documented across 31 reviews, with specific examples of problem-solving and skilled diagnostics. Project completion is solid with 28 mentions, though a few instances of no-shows and one significant water damage incident create some concern. Pricing receives positive feedback in 18 reviews, though one recent review criticized costs as excessive, suggesting some pricing inconsistency or perception variance.

• Multiple empty reviews (5 reviews with 5.0 rating but no text) reduce data quality slightly
• Cluster of 5-star reviews from 2024-06-09 (15 reviews on same date) suggests possible batch posting or review campaign, though content varies sufficiently to avoid full dismissal
• One severe negative incident (2018-04-23): water damage from installation defect, owner non-responsive, required legal action. This is a legitimate complaint with documented consequences and should weigh heavily despite being isolated
• Two no-show/non-responsive incidents (2020-05-01, 2025-05-10) indicate occasional communication/scheduling failures
• One complaint about sending beginner alone (2024-06-09) raises licensing/safety concerns
• Recency: Most reviews are from 2024 (40+ reviews), with strong recent performance, but historical incidents from 2018-2020 show past service issues

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable with HIGH overall confidence due to substantial mention counts across all dimensions (18-42 reviews per category) and predominantly recent data from 2024. However, the score is tempered by documented serious incidents (water damage lawsuit, no-shows, safety concern) that prevent a higher rating despite overwhelming positive sentiment. The company demonstrates strong technical capability and professionalism but has shown inconsistency in accountability and communication during problem resolution.

ASAP Plumbing and Drain earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by a large volume of reviews praising rapid response times, friendly and communicative technicians, and thorough job completion. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers specifically calling out punctuality, clear communication, and courteous behavior. Pricing scores well overall, with many reviewers noting reasonable and fair charges, though two older negative reviews describe overcharging, a stop-payment check dispute, and a markup complaint that temper the score modestly. Project completion is also strong, with most reviewers confirming jobs were finished same-day or within 24 hours, though the older negative reviews document incomplete or substandard work, ignored callbacks, and unresolved billing disputes. Experience scores solidly based on consistent praise for diagnostic accuracy and technical skill, offset slightly by a few older reviews citing improper installations and poor workmanship.

• 4 reviews contain no text (only a star rating) and were excluded from dimension scoring — these provide no usable data.
• 1 review is marked 'unknown' with a 2-star rating and no text — excluded from scoring.
• The review corpus spans 2009 to 2025. Reviews from 2009–2016 include three negative reviews (ratings of 1, 1, 2, and 3) describing serious issues: a drunk technician, improper installations, ignored callbacks, a stop-payment check, and billing disputes. These are given reduced weight due to age but are not ignored, as they represent meaningful quality signals.
• The majority of reviews (roughly 50+) are 5-star with no negative feedback, which is statistically unusual. However, the reviews contain sufficient specific detail (names, job types, specific scenarios) to suggest they are largely genuine rather than fabricated.
• Multiple technician names appear (Paul, Kevin, Shane, Tigger, John) suggesting a multi-person operation, which adds credibility to the review volume but also means quality may vary by technician.
• The 2016 negative review (2-star) explicitly notes a 'small slip in quality' from a long-term customer of 12 years, which corroborates the older negative reviews and suggests quality issues may have been a real pattern at one point in the company's history.
• Recency note: The vast majority of detailed positive reviews are from 2023–2025, suggesting the company may have improved significantly in recent years. Older negative reviews (2009–2016) should be weighted lower but not discarded.

This WW Score is based on a large and detailed review set spanning 15+ years, with strong recent positive signals and a small but credible cluster of older negative reviews; the score is moderately reliable with HIGH confidence on volume, though users should note that older negative reviews document serious past issues that may or may not reflect current operations.

Donahue Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism and technical expertise across most reviews, with consistent praise for Chris, Thomas, and Trevor's responsiveness, knowledge, and courteous demeanor. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and competitive with transparent quotes. However, project completion shows meaningful weakness: three explicit reviews document serious follow-up failures (unresponded warranty callbacks, missed bid follow-ups, post-job leak not addressed), which significantly impacts this dimension despite many positive completion stories. The company excels at technical problem-solving and workmanship quality but struggles with accountability on callbacks and post-project communication.

• CRITICAL: Three reviews (2025-05-10, 2021-11-05, 2018-12-24) document serious communication/follow-up failures including ignored warranty callbacks, unresponded bid requests, and post-job leak denial. These are not isolated complaints but pattern evidence of systemic responsiveness issues.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most reviews cluster in 2023-2024 (positive) and 2021-2022 (mixed). The most recent negative review (2025-05-10) is current and suggests ongoing callback issues despite historical reputation.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: Multiple reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('would recommend to anyone,' 'above and beyond,' 'great job') with minimal specific detail. While not necessarily fake, this limits confidence in depth of feedback.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: Four reviews contain no text (2023-06-10, 2022-06-10, 2021-06-10 x3), reducing usable data from 67 to 66 reviews.
• OUTLIER REVIEW: One review (2013-09-16) references 'Cheap-o-Rooter' instead of Donahue Plumbing, suggesting possible data entry error or review misattribution.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for overall assessment but should be interpreted with caution: the company demonstrates genuine expertise and professionalism in technical work and pricing, but the documented pattern of communication failures on callbacks and post-job follow-up (3 explicit mentions across different years) represents a material weakness that may not be fully captured in the aggregate score. Customers should expect excellent workmanship but should verify callback commitments in writing.