Find Nearby Plumbers In Salt Lake City, Utah

Arnoldson Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is evidenced by punctuality, responsiveness, courteous communication, and detailed explanations across 7 reviews. Pricing receives strong marks for transparency, fairness, and value—multiple reviews explicitly note costs were lower than competitors with no inflated charges. Project completion is solid with on-time arrivals, thorough work, and multiple complex jobs handled successfully. Experience is reflected in skilled technicians (Troy, Clair) who diagnose problems accurately, explain work clearly, and execute detailed plumbing tasks without upselling unnecessary services.

• All 8 reviews are 5-star ratings with uniformly positive language and no critical feedback. While individual reviews contain specific details (water heater replacement, pipe work, emergency response), the absence of any mixed or negative reviews is unusual and warrants caution.
• Review dates span 2011–2024, with only 1 review from the past 12 months (August 2024). Most reviews are 4–13 years old, limiting recency validation of current service quality.
• Small sample size (8 reviews) means score is based on limited data volume, though mention counts within those reviews are solid.

This WW Score of 89.2 is reliable within the constraints of the available data: all four dimensions are well-supported by multiple explicit mentions, and confidence is HIGH across the board. However, the uniformly positive rating distribution and age of most reviews suggest caution—current service quality should be validated with more recent customer feedback before making high-stakes decisions.

Rocket Plumbing receives consistently strong praise across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism and responsiveness being the most frequently cited strengths — reviewers repeatedly highlight prompt arrivals, same-day or next-day service, honest communication, and a no-pressure sales approach. Pricing is a standout theme, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting costs were significantly lower than competitor quotes, sometimes by more than half. Project completion scores are high, with reviewers describing jobs finished quickly, correctly, and without callbacks needed. Experience and workmanship are well-supported by specific mentions of complex repairs, water heater replacements, HVAC work, and problem-solving under time pressure. The overall picture is of a reliable, skilled, and fairly priced small contractor team.

• A notable portion of reviews (approximately 19 of 21) have no date attached, making recency assessment impossible for most of the dataset. Only one review is confirmed within the past 12 months (June 2024).
• All 21 reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed feedback, which is statistically unusual and warrants mild caution.
• Several reviews share very similar structure and praise patterns (e.g., 'Kyle and Bill were...', 'reasonable price', 'highly recommend'), which could suggest a degree of coached or prompted reviewing, though specific job details in many reviews reduce this concern somewhat.
• The named technicians Kyle and Bill appear across many reviews, suggesting a very small team, which may limit scalability of quality but also indicates consistent service delivery.

This WW Score carries moderate-to-high reliability given the volume of reviews and specificity of feedback, but is tempered by the near-total absence of review dates, a perfect 5-star distribution across all reviews, and some repetitive phrasing patterns that suggest possible review solicitation bias.

M-One demonstrates exceptional performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with staff described as knowledgeable, friendly, helpful, and respectful—all 12 reviews mention positive interpersonal interactions. Project completion is strong, with 11 reviews highlighting successful part identification, sourcing of hard-to-find items, and follow-through on customer needs, including on-site repairs. Experience is uniformly excellent, with all 12 reviews emphasizing technical expertise, problem-solving ability, and willingness to educate customers. Pricing receives solid marks from 5 reviews citing affordability and reasonable prices, though fewer reviews explicitly address cost. The business has maintained this reputation over a 10-year period.

• All 12 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback—this is unusual and warrants caution. While the reviews contain specific details and vary in language, the universal perfection suggests potential selection bias or that dissatisfied customers may not be represented.
• Most reviews (7 of 12) are older than 3 years, with only 2 reviews from 2024. Recent performance data is limited.
• This appears to be a plumbing supply store/parts retailer, not a contracting/plumbing service business. Reviews focus on parts sourcing and customer service at a counter, not on job completion, scheduling, or on-site work. The WW Score framework is designed for service contractors and may not fully capture the business model.

The WW Score of 88.2 is reliable for assessing customer service quality and parts expertise, but should be interpreted cautiously due to the absence of negative reviews, limited recent data (only 2 reviews from past 12 months), and the fact that this business model differs from typical contracting work that the WW Score framework is designed to evaluate.

Hanks Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is evidenced by punctuality, courteous behavior, responsiveness to communication, and attention to detail (e.g., laying down cloths to protect homes). Project completion is reliable with jobs finished on time and callbacks honored promptly. Pricing is fair and transparent with multiple reviewers noting affordability and honest guidance. Experience is clearly demonstrated through skilled diagnostics, quality workmanship, and ability to handle diverse plumbing tasks. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects high-confidence data from 11 substantive reviews spanning multiple years.

• RECENCY CONCERN: Most reviews are older than 12 months (only 1 review from 2024, 1 from 2022, remainder from 2021 and earlier). Only 2 of 11 usable reviews are from the past 3 years. Current service quality cannot be fully assessed.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Review dated 2016-02-18 contains only 'unknown' as text and cannot be evaluated. Review dated 2014-06-02 is 10 years old and may not reflect current operations.
• ALL 5-STAR BIAS: 10 of 11 usable reviews are 5-star ratings with only 1 four-star review. This uniformity is unusual and may indicate selection bias or review filtering, though individual reviews do contain specific, credible details that support quality claims.
• REPETITIVE NAMING: Multiple reviews reference 'Shane' and 'Hank' interchangeably, suggesting these may be the same person or close associates. Consistency is positive but limits diversity of reviewer experience.

This score should be treated with MODERATE-to-HIGH confidence for historical performance, but CAUTION is warranted regarding current service quality due to review age; the most recent substantive review is from May 2024, but the bulk of data is 3+ years old. Recommend seeking recent reviews or direct contact to verify current operations.

Millcreek Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a large and diverse review pool spanning over a decade. Professionalism is consistently praised — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, friendly attitudes, clear communication, and courteous behavior, with only a small number of negative outliers citing rudeness or unwillingness to engage. Pricing receives solid but slightly tempered scores: the overwhelming majority of reviewers describe fair, transparent, and competitive pricing, but a handful of reviews explicitly flag high quotes or feeling overcharged, preventing a top-tier score. Project completion is the strongest dimension — reviewers frequently describe jobs finished on time, complex problems solved creatively, follow-up calls honored, and no abandoned work, with one notable exception involving a refusal to even assess a crawl space job. Experience scores high as well, with numerous reviewers citing technical skill, creative problem-solving on difficult jobs, and superior knowledge compared to competing plumbers.

• Two reviews (1-star, 2023) appear to be non-service complaints: one describes nearly being run over by a company van on I-15, and another disputes a $175 charge for three toilet flappers. These are included but treated as edge-case outliers rather than representative service failures.
• One 1-star review (2015) describes a rude phone dismissal and a $300+ starting quote for drain snaking, and another (2015) describes an unwillingness to enter a crawl space with an inflated estimate. These are legitimate negative signals and are factored into professionalism and pricing scores.
• One 1-star review (2016) describes Dan as short and rude on the phone. This is a direct professionalism concern and is weighted accordingly.
• A large proportion of reviews are 5-star, which warrants scrutiny. However, the reviews contain specific names (Jordan, Dan, Josh, Preston, Tony, Kelly, Jared, Spencer, Miguel, Brady), specific job descriptions, dates, and unique situational details. This level of specificity significantly reduces the likelihood of coordinated fake reviews.
• Approximately 40% of reviews are older than 3 years (pre-2022). While the company has a strong recent review presence (2025 and 2024), older reviews are given slightly reduced weight. The consistency of quality across the full timeline actually reinforces confidence rather than undermining it.
• One review (2025-03-11) contains no text — only a 5-star rating. This review was excluded from dimension scoring as it provides no usable data.

This WW Score is based on 100 reviews with strong specificity, named technicians, varied job types, and a consistent multi-year track record, making it one of the more reliable scores possible; the small number of legitimate negative reviews have been factored in and prevent score inflation.

Plumbing Excellence earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by an exceptionally large and detailed review base spanning nearly a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers praising named technicians — Ryan, Grant, Evan, Jonathan, Josh, and others — for punctuality, courtesy, clear communication, and respectful conduct in customers' homes. Experience and technical knowledge are consistently highlighted, with multiple reviewers describing thorough diagnostics, transparent explanations of problems and options, and high-quality workmanship. Project completion scores well, with strong evidence of jobs finished same-day or next-day, follow-through on emergency calls, and no pattern of abandoned work — though two 3-star reviews and one 1-star review introduce modest downward pressure, including one instance of a $1,000 diagnostic with no resolution and a disputed service fee structure. Pricing scores lower than the other dimensions because while many reviewers describe fair or reasonable pricing, at least two reviewers noted costs felt high or unclear, and one reviewer explicitly felt the service fee model was unfair — preventing a top-tier score in this category.

• Two reviews contain no text — only a star rating (5.0 and 3.0). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• A small number of reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Fast friendly service', 'Great owner and a wonderful staff', 'Jeremy and Grant were fantastic!'). While not conclusively fake, these lack specifics and were weighted conservatively.
• The review corpus spans 2014–2025. Reviews older than 12 months (pre-June 2024) were given reduced weight. The majority of detailed, high-quality reviews are from 2024–2025, which supports score reliability for current performance.
• One 1-star review (Sept 2024) explicitly flagged a pricing concern: a $90 service fee described as a fuel charge rather than a diagnostic fee, followed by a $700 diagnostic quote. This was factored into the pricing score.
• One 3-star review (Aug 2024) noted a $1,000 diagnostic with no resolution, which negatively impacted both the pricing and project completion scores.
• No strong patterns of fake reviews detected. Most reviews name specific technicians, describe specific problems, and include personal details — consistent with authentic customer experiences.

This WW Score is based on 63 reviews with usable data spanning 2014–2025, with the majority from the past 12 months, and carries HIGH overall confidence — the score reliably reflects a contractor with strong professionalism and technical skill, a minor but real pricing transparency concern, and an isolated project completion failure.