Overview of Company Customer Sentiment Analysis in January
The reviews for Gilbreath Larry reflect a predominantly negative sentiment. Customers report significant dissatisfaction with the responsiveness and professionalism of the service provided. Many express frustration over repeated visits required to resolve plumbing issues that were not adequately addressed the first time. There are serious concerns about the qualifications of the staff, with specif... Read more
The reviews for Gilbreath Larry reflect a predominantly negative sentiment. Customers report significant dissatisfaction with the responsiveness and professionalism of the service provided. Many express frustration over repeated visits required to resolve plumbing issues that were not adequately addressed the first time. There are serious concerns about the qualifications of the staff, with specific claims of unlicensed workers and inadequate tools. The communication with the owner is described as unpleasant, contributing to an overall lack of trust in the company's integrity. The mention of theft during service further compounds customer grievances, leading to a strong recommendation against engaging their services. Read less
Overview of Company Customer Sentiment Analysis in January
The reviews indicate a clear pattern of discontent among customers of Gilbreath Larry. Key areas of concern include:Responsiveness: Customers consistently note a lack of urgency in addressing plumbing emergencies. In this specific review, the customer's claim of having water "gushing" from their pipes, coupled with delays in response, suggests that the company does not prioritize emergency situati... Read more
The reviews indicate a clear pattern of discontent among customers of Gilbreath Larry. Key areas of concern include:Responsiveness: Customers consistently note a lack of urgency in addressing plumbing emergencies. In this specific review, the customer's claim of having water "gushing" from their pipes, coupled with delays in response, suggests that the company does not prioritize emergency situations.Quality of Service: The quality of work performed has come under scrutiny, with multiple mentions that issues were not resolved during the initial visit. The reviewer pointed out that the same crew returned without having adequately fixed the problem the first time, indicating potential deficiencies in both skills and training.Professional Qualifications: There are strong concerns about the competency and qualifications of the technicians sent to the job. The reviewer refers to them as "hacks" and expresses doubt about their licensing, which raises significant concerns about the company Read less
Write a Reviews
Add Photo
Share
Save
Follow