Overview of Company Customer Sentiment Analysis in January
The reviews for MKB Property Enhancement reflect a strongly negative sentiment, primarily focusing on poor communication, unmet deadlines, and unexpected additional charges. Customers express frustration with the prolonged duration of renovation projects, the lack of professionalism displayed by the service provider, and ultimately feeling compelled to pay excessive fees to avoid further complicat... Read more
The reviews for MKB Property Enhancement reflect a strongly negative sentiment, primarily focusing on poor communication, unmet deadlines, and unexpected additional charges. Customers express frustration with the prolonged duration of renovation projects, the lack of professionalism displayed by the service provider, and ultimately feeling compelled to pay excessive fees to avoid further complications. Overall, the experience with MKB has led to significant dissatisfaction and an unwillingness to recommend or use their services again. Read less
Overview of Company Customer Sentiment Analysis in January
The review highlights several common pain points experienced by customers of MKB Property Enhancement. A primary theme is the lack of adherence to quoted timelines. The reviewer anticipated a 2-3 week completion timeframe; however, the project extended to four months, which caused inconvenience and frustration. This extended delay, coupled with the need for continuous follow-ups from the property ... Read more
The review highlights several common pain points experienced by customers of MKB Property Enhancement. A primary theme is the lack of adherence to quoted timelines. The reviewer anticipated a 2-3 week completion timeframe; however, the project extended to four months, which caused inconvenience and frustration. This extended delay, coupled with the need for continuous follow-ups from the property manager/realtor, indicates a significant communication breakdown between MKB and its clients. Additionally, the review suggests issues related to the business's operational structure, as it was revealed that the contractor, Matt Boss, managed MKB as a side job while holding a full-time position. This dual commitment appears to have negatively impacted MKB's ability to prioritize and complete projects in a timely manner. Clients seem to feel they are not receiving the dedicated attention and service they expect and deserve. The reviewer also mentions the quality of work done, with specific reference to mistakes that required additional corrections by another contractor, further highlighting concerns about the workmanship and professionalism associated with MKB. This could reflect a broader trend where completed work does not meet quality standards, leading to further financial burdens for clients. Lastly, the unwelcome surprise of an inflated invoice with additional charges appears to have left the reviewer feeling cornered, as they had to pay to facilitate the sale of their property. The threat of a mechanic's lien adds a layer of distress, showcasing a lack of flexibility and willingness to engage in a customer-friendly resolution process. In summary, the feedback paints a negative picture of MKB Property Enhancement, with crucial lessons about communication, project management, and customer service that warrant serious consideration for potential clients. Read less
Write a Reviews
Add Photo
Share
Save
Follow