Find Nearby Plumbers In Greensboro, North Carolina

Mark Friddle Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, courteous demeanor, and clear communication across 32 reviews. Project completion is solid with 38 mentions showing reliable follow-through, same-day or next-day service, and thorough problem-solving. Experience and technical knowledge are well-documented across 18 reviews, with customers noting skilled diagnostics and quality workmanship. Pricing shows moderate confidence with 13 mentions; while most reviews praise fair pricing and value, a few negative reviews cite unexpected charges or disappointment with estimate fees, creating some inconsistency in the pricing narrative.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The first two reviews are identical word-for-word (Roto Rooter expansion tank story), both dated 2021-12-05 with different timestamps. This suggests either a system error or potential review manipulation. Confidence in pricing dimension slightly reduced due to this anomaly.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Majority of reviews (approximately 85%) are from 2006-2013, with only 3-4 reviews from 2021. Most data is 8-15+ years old. Recent performance may differ from historical patterns.
• MULTIPLE GENERIC/MINIMAL REVIEWS: Several reviews contain only 1-3 words ('unknown', 'Very well!', 'Wonderful', 'All went well as expected') with no substantive detail. These 7 reviews provide minimal actionable information but do not suggest fake reviews—more likely Angie's List system artifacts.
• INCONSISTENT RESPONSIVENESS: Two reviews (2013-12-12 and 2012-09-18) report poor follow-up communication and broken promises to call back, contrasting sharply with the overwhelming majority of positive responsiveness claims. This suggests occasional lapses in communication consistency.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for historical performance but should be treated with caution regarding current service quality, as the vast majority of data is 8+ years old and only 3-4 recent reviews exist; the score reflects strong professionalism and project completion with moderate pricing consistency, but the duplicate review and age of data warrant verification with recent customer references before making a decision.

Blackwell Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with particular strength in responsiveness, communication, and fair pricing. The vast majority of reviewers praise Jasper and his team for same-day or next-day availability, transparent pricing, and thorough workmanship on a wide variety of jobs including slab leaks, water heater replacements, hydrojetting, and drain clearing. However, two credible 1-star reviews describe serious failures: one customer was ghosted after three appointment reschedules, another reported being charged an unexpected $1,800 for a new water heeter without prior warning and never received receipts despite repeated requests. A third 1-star review also describes a no-show with no communication. These incidents meaningfully suppress scores in professionalism and project completion, preventing top-tier scores despite the otherwise strong record. Pricing scores are high but slightly tempered by one instance where the final cost exceeded the original quote, though the contractor did communicate the change before proceeding.

• THREE credible 1-star reviews describe serious failures: two no-show/ghosting incidents (2022-11-27 and 2023-12-13) and one incident involving an unexpected $1,800 upsell with no receipts provided after multiple requests (2024-01-04). These are specific, detailed, and credible negative reviews that significantly contrast with the otherwise positive record.
• Cluster of 8 reviews posted on the same date (2024-09-19) within a short time window. While not identical in phrasing, the concentration is unusual and may suggest a coordinated review push. These reviews have been included but treated with moderate skepticism.
• Several reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Always reasonably priced. Just fantastic!' from 2016, 'Drain works well and hopefully lasts the till next year' from 2021) and contribute limited usable signal.
• A significant portion of reviews span from 2013 to 2021 — more than 1 year old. Per recency rules, reviews from 2024 and late 2023 were weighted more heavily. Older reviews were treated as supporting context only.
• The 2013 and 2016 reviews are extremely dated and carry negligible weight in scoring.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of 54 reviews spanning over a decade, with strong recent data from 2023–2024, giving the score reasonable reliability; however, the presence of three specific and credible negative reviews — including a no-receipt billing complaint and two no-show incidents — introduces meaningful risk that the score may overstate consistency of service delivery.

Gwyn Services demonstrates strong professionalism with 38 mentions of punctuality, courtesy, and communication across recent reviews. Technical expertise is well-documented with 24 mentions of knowledgeable, thorough work. However, project completion shows concerning gaps with 12 mentions revealing issues including missed appointments, incomplete diagnostics requiring multiple service calls, and follow-up failures. Pricing is a notable weakness with only 6 mentions but consistently negative feedback—customers report charges of $570 for three plumbing tasks and $101+ service fees perceived as excessive. The company's recent performance (past 12 months) is substantially stronger than older reviews, suggesting operational improvements.

• RECENCY BIAS DETECTED: 39 of 56 reviews (70%) are dated 2025-04-10 to 2025-06-06, creating a heavily skewed recent sample. Only 4 reviews predate 2022. This concentration may not reflect long-term reliability.
• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple 5-star reviews from June 2025 contain generic praise with minimal specifics (2 blank reviews, several one-sentence reviews with no detail). This clustering warrants caution.
• CRITICAL SERVICE FAILURES: Three 1-star reviews document serious issues: (1) Theft allegation with employee denying involvement but company dismissing customer concern without investigation; (2) Multiple service call charges for incomplete diagnostics; (3) Missed appointments and non-responsiveness. These are not isolated complaints.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS: Two detailed negative reviews specifically cite high pricing ($570 for 3 tasks, $101 service fee) as primary dissatisfaction despite acknowledging quality work. Pricing dimension confidence is MODERATE due to only 6 mentions, but sentiment is consistently negative.
• APPOINTMENT RELIABILITY: Multiple reviews mention scheduling issues, missed appointments, and lack of follow-up communication, contradicting the professionalism score on execution.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with caution due to extreme recency bias in the review sample and suspected clustering of generic 5-star reviews. While recent performance (2025) appears strong in professionalism and experience, the score is artificially elevated by 70% of reviews being from a 2-month window. Older reviews (2014–2022) reveal systemic issues with appointment reliability, pricing transparency, and complaint resolution that suggest the company's current high ratings may not reflect consistent long-term performance. The pricing dimension is particularly weak and underrepresented. Prospective customers should weight the negative reviews heavily and request detailed pricing upfront.

High Point Plumbing Services demonstrates strong professionalism across nearly all reviews, with consistent praise for responsiveness, politeness, and clear communication from James and his team. Pricing is perceived as fair and transparent with no hidden charges, and technical expertise is evident in problem-solving and thorough explanations. However, project completion reliability is significantly undermined by two critical failures: one no-show inspection with no follow-up communication, and a promised callback for floor repair work that never materialized despite multiple assurances. These lapses in follow-through substantially lower the overall score despite otherwise excellent service quality.

• Two serious project completion failures (reviews dated 2024-08-20 and 2024-04-20) involving missed appointments and broken promises to follow up. These are not isolated complaints but represent a pattern of accountability issues.
• The 2024-08-20 review shows complete communication breakdown with no response to calls, voicemails, or Yelp messages—this is a red flag for reliability.
• The 2024-04-20 review documents a specific commitment (Monday 2:00pm callback) that was not honored, followed by multiple unfulfilled promises to follow up. This suggests systemic issues with scheduling or accountability.
• Most reviews are from 2024 (recent), which increases relevance. However, the two negative reviews are also recent (August and April 2024), indicating ongoing issues rather than past problems.

This score should be trusted with caution: while professionalism and pricing dimensions are well-supported by consistent positive evidence, the project completion score is dragged down by documented failures that directly contradict the company's stated commitments, creating meaningful risk for customers requiring follow-up work or callbacks.

Jet Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistently praised responsiveness, punctuality, and courteous service across 89 mentions. Technical expertise and workmanship quality are well-documented across 71 reviews, with Tony and his team frequently commended for problem-solving ability and knowledge. Project completion is solid at 78.5, though some reviews mention delayed callbacks and incomplete follow-through on warranty claims. Pricing receives a moderate score of 79.0 based on 42 mentions—most customers report fair and competitive rates, but a few note higher-than-expected costs or disputes over warranty coverage. The company operates across multiple service areas with some geographic service limitations that have caused customer frustration.

• Multiple reviews (at least 6) report serious communication failures: customers unable to reach the company, no callbacks despite multiple attempts, and emergency calls not returned. This is a significant reliability concern.
• At least 4 reviews describe project completion issues: incomplete work, abandoned jobs, failure to honor warranty claims, and lack of follow-up on warranty company submissions.
• One detailed 2021 review describes aggressive behavior (yelling, profanities, threats to remove repair) during a warranty dispute, which is a serious professionalism red flag.
• Geographic service area confusion appears in multiple reviews—customers were told the company services their area but were later told they do not, causing emergency situations to worsen.
• Several blank/empty reviews with only ratings (no text) suggest possible review manipulation or incomplete submissions; however, these are minimal in number.
• One 2021 review alleges the owner called the customer unsolicited to complain about a negative review, raising privacy and professionalism concerns.
• Inconsistency in service quality: some reviews mention different owner names (Tony, Taff, Sean, Joe, Nick) across different time periods and locations, suggesting either multiple locations/franchises or name inconsistencies that create confusion.
• Review recency: approximately 40% of reviews are from 2020 or earlier; more recent reviews (2024-2025) show mixed quality with some serious complaints about responsiveness.

This WW Score of 81.2 should be treated with caution despite HIGH overall confidence. While the company excels in professionalism and technical expertise based on substantial evidence, the recurring pattern of communication failures, incomplete project follow-through, and at least one documented incident of aggressive customer interaction significantly undermines trustworthiness. The score reflects strong technical capability but inconsistent execution and customer service reliability. Prospective customers should verify service area coverage in advance and establish clear communication protocols before hiring.

Stephen Coble demonstrates strong performance across all dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with explicit mentions of friendliness, courtesy, responsiveness, punctuality, and professional demeanor across all five reviews. Project completion is solid, with multiple reviews confirming work was finished as promised, estimates were honored, and communication was maintained throughout. Pricing is noted as fair and competitive in three reviews, with one reviewer specifically highlighting rates as 'tremendous.' Technical skill and workmanship quality are evident from tile work, plumbing repairs, and flooring projects described across four reviews. The primary limitation is the small sample size (5 reviews) and recency skew, with most reviews from 2019–2023.

• All five reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback or complaints — this uniformity warrants caution, though reviews do contain specific project details and varied contexts that suggest authenticity rather than fabrication.
• Sample size is small (n=5); confidence in the WW Score is therefore moderate rather than high despite strong individual dimension confidence.
• Most reviews are older than 12 months (4 of 5 from 2019–2023); only one review from 2023 provides recent performance data. Current service quality cannot be fully assessed.

This WW Score of 89.3 should be treated as moderately reliable due to consistent positive evidence across all dimensions, but the small sample size and age of most reviews limit confidence; additional recent reviews would strengthen reliability.