Find Nearby Plumbers In Charlotte, North Carolina

All Star Plumbing earns strong marks across professionalism, project completion, and experience, with the vast majority of reviewers praising courteous, knowledgeable technicians who arrive on time and complete jobs thoroughly. Recurring technicians such as Kyle, Manny, Jerry, Anthony, Toan, Bobby, and Johnny are cited repeatedly for going above and beyond, explaining issues clearly, and leaving work areas clean. Project completion is a clear strength, with many reviews noting same-day or next-day service, jobs finished as promised, and follow-through on callbacks. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers describe costs as fair or competitive, a meaningful minority of negative reviews cite quotes that were significantly higher than competitors, unexpected charges, or price discrepancies between phone estimates and final invoices. A small but notable cluster of negative reviews also flags instances of no-shows, poor communication, rude behavior, and at least one case of faulty workmanship with no warranty honored, which moderately suppresses the professionalism and project completion scores.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews with identical text ('Great customer service he did what needed to be done. Our kitchen sink stopped up. Knew exactly what to do.') were posted two days apart (2025-06-06 and 2025-06-08) with the same 5-star rating. This is a likely fake or duplicate submission and was counted only once for scoring purposes.
• REVIEW SCOPE CONCERN: This review set appears to aggregate reviews from multiple distinct All Star Plumbing businesses across different cities and states (Fresno CA, Fairfield CA, Napa CA, Corona CA, Greensboro NC, Minneapolis MN area, Arizona, and others). These are almost certainly separate, unrelated businesses operating under the same or similar name. Scores and narratives may reflect a blended profile of multiple companies rather than a single contractor, significantly reducing the reliability of any aggregate score.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span from approximately 2005 to June 2025. A substantial portion of reviews predate 2022 and reflect business conditions, staff, and ownership that may no longer be current. Recent reviews (2024-2025) are weighted more heavily in scoring but older reviews still influence the aggregate.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW PATTERN: Approximately 20-25 reviews (roughly 5-6% of the total) are 1-2 star ratings citing: price gouging or bait-and-switch pricing, no-shows or failure to return calls, rude or dismissive technicians, faulty workmanship with no warranty honored, and pressure tactics. These are distributed across the review history and are not isolated incidents.
• GENERIC PRAISE PATTERN: A significant number of short reviews (e.g., 'Great service!', 'Professional', 'Excellent and friendly service', 'Best experience') contain no specific detail and cannot be reliably scored. These were excluded from dimension scoring but counted toward total reviews analyzed.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Approximately 10 reviews contained no text (only a star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring.

This WW Score carries HIGH data confidence due to the large volume of detailed reviews, but its practical reliability is MODERATE-to-LIMITED as a guide for hiring any single contractor, because the review pool almost certainly blends feedback for multiple unrelated businesses operating under the 'All Star Plumbing' name across different states and regions — consumers should verify they are reading reviews specific to their local branch before making a hiring decision.

Guaranteed Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism (85.2) and project completion (83.5). The company benefits from extensive positive feedback regarding punctuality, communication, and technical competence. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and reasonable, though some customers report occasional discrepancies between quoted and final invoices. The company shows consistent ability to complete jobs thoroughly and on time, with strong follow-up service. However, a notable minority of negative reviews (approximately 8% of total) reveal serious issues including upfront payment demands, no-shows, incomplete work, and poor responsiveness to complaints, primarily associated with certain technicians or locations.

• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple reviews from 2025-05-10 and 2025-04-10 show suspiciously similar phrasing ('Las Vegas Plumbing' mentioned repeatedly in generic service descriptions with minimal specific detail), suggesting possible review manipulation or bot-generated content. These reviews lack the natural variation and specific customer context found in authentic reviews.
• QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: Significant variance in service quality appears tied to specific technicians. Reviews mentioning 'Robert' contain disproportionately high negative feedback regarding upfront payment demands, no-shows, and poor warranty service. Other technicians (Marcus, Patrick, Johnny, Gary) consistently receive praise.
• UPFRONT PAYMENT CONTROVERSY: Multiple 1-star reviews (2020-06-10, 2020-06-10, 2021-12-08) specifically cite demands for $59-$100 upfront diagnostic fees before service, with customers reporting this as a red flag and potential scam indicator. This practice appears to have generated significant customer dissatisfaction.
• GEOGRAPHIC/OPERATIONAL INCONSISTENCY: Reviews suggest the company may operate under multiple names or have multiple locations (references to 'Guaranteed Plumbing,' 'Las Vegas Plumbing,' 'Robert's Plumbing,' 'High Desert Plumbing'). One 2017-07-05 review explicitly warns that an unlicensed operator was misrepresenting affiliation with 'High Desert Plumbing.'
• COMMUNICATION FAILURES: Multiple reviews from 2013-2019 document failure to follow up on quotes, return phone calls, or honor promised callbacks, suggesting systemic office management issues during certain periods.
• PRICING DISPUTES: Several reviews (2015-06-04, 2023-06-10, 2019-09-11) report significant discrepancies between quoted prices and final invoices, with some customers charged $100-$250 more than initially quoted.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for understanding the company's general performance trajectory, but should be interpreted with caution: the high proportion of 5-star reviews (approximately 85% of total) combined with suspicious clustering of identical phrasing in recent reviews suggests potential review manipulation that may inflate the score. The negative reviews, while fewer in number, reveal consistent patterns of serious issues (upfront fees, no-shows, incomplete work, poor follow-up) that disproportionately affect certain customer segments. Prospective customers should weight recent positive reviews skeptically and specifically inquire about the technician assigned, upfront payment policies, and warranty terms before committing.

Plumbing Connection receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with the strongest signals in project completion and technical experience — reviewers consistently describe jobs finished same-day, on time, and correctly the first time. Professionalism scores well overall, with punctuality, courtesy, and responsiveness cited repeatedly, but is tempered by a meaningful cluster of negative reviews describing missed appointments, no-shows, and failure to return calls, which prevents a higher score. Pricing is generally praised as fair and competitive, though a handful of reviewers explicitly called out charges as too high or felt overcharged after the fact, keeping this dimension from scoring in the high 80s. The score is also modestly reduced by a suspicious cluster of 10 reviews all dated 2022-04-05 with near-identical generic phrasing and no specific details, which are flagged as likely inauthentic.

• SUSPECTED FAKE REVIEWS: 10 reviews all dated exactly 2022-04-05 share repetitive, generic phrasing ('They are professional and reliable', 'I am very satisfied with the service', 'They always solve the problem', 'They make sure everything is done properly') with no job-specific details, no named technicians, and no unique context. This pattern is highly consistent with fabricated or incentivized reviews. These were included in analysis but weighted conservatively.
• MIXED ENTITY CONCERN: Reviews reference multiple distinct technicians and owners across different geographies — 'Jim Bridges' (appears to be a North Carolina/Charlotte-area operator), 'Israr Khan' and 'Nery' (Bay Area/Fremont CA operator), 'Chip', 'Bryant', 'Scott', 'Jeremy', 'Bart', and others. This strongly suggests these reviews may be aggregated from multiple businesses operating under the same or similar 'Plumbing Connection' name. Scores may reflect a blended profile of more than one company, reducing reliability.
• NEGATIVE REVIEWS PRESENT: 8 reviews rated 1-3 stars explicitly describe missed appointments, no-shows, failure to call back, overcharging, and a contract dispute. These are genuine signals of inconsistency in professionalism and project follow-through and were factored into scoring.
• RECENCY NOTE: Reviews span from 2012 to 2025. A significant portion of reviews (roughly 40%) are older than 3 years. The most recent reviews (2024-2025) are predominantly positive and specific, suggesting current performance may be stronger than the blended historical score indicates. Recency weighting was applied where possible.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW: Two reviews with identical text ('They came quickly and gave honest advice. I really appreciate all they did for us. Will call them again for sure') were submitted two days apart (2025-04-07 and 2025-04-09). This is flagged as a likely duplicate submission and was counted as one data point.

This WW Score is based on a large volume of reviews (175 total) spanning over a decade, providing HIGH statistical confidence in the directional score, but reliability is meaningfully reduced by three factors: a suspected cluster of fake reviews, strong evidence that reviews may be aggregated across multiple distinct businesses sharing the same name, and a recurring pattern of no-show and responsiveness complaints that contrast with the otherwise positive majority — consumers should treat this score as a reasonable baseline but verify the specific operator they are hiring.

The overwhelming majority of reviews across this large dataset praise punctuality, friendliness, and courteous communication, driving a solid professionalism score. Pricing is frequently cited as fair, reasonable, or better than competitors, with multiple reviewers specifically noting transparent quotes and no surprise charges. Project completion is generally strong, with most jobs described as finished on time and thoroughly, though a meaningful cluster of negative reviews — including abandoned work, no-shows, water left running, trash not removed, and a failed callback — prevents a higher score. Experience scores well overall, with many reviewers citing skilled, knowledgeable technicians who solved complex problems, but tempered by a notable 1-star review describing a technician who could not diagnose a basic water heater fault and charged $300 for the failure. The score reflects a genuinely capable operation with recurring but non-trivial service failures.

• 26 reviews contain no text — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• The dataset appears to aggregate reviews from at least two distinct businesses: 'York Plumbing' (recent reviews, 2024–2025) and 'Rose Plumbing' (older reviews, 2006–2023). Scores reflect the combined pool but the businesses may not be the same entity. Treat with caution.
• Several negative reviews describe serious failures: a technician leaving water running and trash behind (May 2025), a no-show with no callback (2019), an abandoned sump pump repair with no communication (2017), a $300 charge for a failed diagnosis (2011), unprofessional conduct including foul language in front of a child (2020), refusal to serve a customer due to a stutter (2021), and arrogant/belittling behavior with damage left unaddressed (2008).
• The majority of Rose Plumbing reviews are older than 3 years (many from 2006–2014), significantly reducing their relevance to current service quality. York Plumbing reviews are recent (2024–2025) and more reliable for current assessment.
• No strong fake review pattern detected, though several York Plumbing reviews are very brief and generic (e.g., 'Always a 5 star experience', 'Great job!'). These were scored conservatively.
• One review (2012) gave 1 star solely because the company did not serve the reviewer's area — this is not a service quality complaint and was excluded from dimension scoring.
• One review (2024) appears to describe a different company entirely ('Rose Plumbing' in NoVa/Northern Virginia context with HomeServe) and may be a misattributed review. Scored conservatively.

This WW Score is based on a large review pool (136 total, 110 with usable data) spanning nearly two decades and likely covering more than one business entity, which significantly limits direct applicability to any single current operator; the score should be treated as a general directional indicator rather than a precise measure of today's service quality.

WyattWorks demonstrates strong professionalism with consistently praised communication, punctuality, and courteous technicians across 98 mentions. Technical expertise and problem-solving ability are well-documented across 85 mentions, with technicians frequently noted as knowledgeable and thorough. Project completion is solid across 72 mentions, with most jobs finished on time and callbacks honored. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness with 28 mentions revealing significant customer dissatisfaction—multiple reviews cite charges substantially above market rates, lack of transparent upfront quotes, and perceived overcharging for parts and labor. Recent reviews (past 12 months) are predominantly positive, but older reviews reveal recurring scheduling and no-show issues that appear to have been largely resolved.

• PRICING CONCERN: Multiple reviews (at least 8) explicitly cite high or excessive pricing, with specific complaints about charges 2-3x market rates for parts and labor. This is the primary weakness in the profile.
• SCHEDULING ISSUES (HISTORICAL): Older reviews (2020-2023) contain multiple complaints about no-shows, failure to keep appointments, and unclear scheduling policies. Recent reviews (2024-2025) show dramatic improvement, suggesting this issue has been addressed.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Reviews 1, 2, 5, and 6 contain nearly identical phrasing ('I am thrilled to have found Wyatt Works! They responded promptly, exceptionally knowledgeable and professional, and financially reasonable' and 'Ben and Izzy were outstanding—professional, efficient, and went above and beyond to ensure everything was done right the first time'). These appear on consecutive dates (June 6-9, 2025) with identical wording. Additionally, multiple reviews lack substantive detail and use generic praise. This reduces confidence slightly in the professionalism and pricing scores.
• BLANK REVIEWS: 8 reviews contain no text, only ratings (all 5.0 stars). These provide no usable data but inflate the review count.
• DEPOSIT/PAYMENT ISSUE: One detailed 2023 review describes a check being cashed after the customer requested cancellation and received no response, suggesting potential business practice concerns.
• ELECTRICAL WORK COMPLAINT: One 2022 review indicates the company created an electrical problem during plumbing installation and refused responsibility, citing they are not electricians.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for assessing professionalism and technical expertise (both HIGH confidence), but the pricing score should be treated with caution due to the moderate confidence level and clear pattern of customer dissatisfaction with costs. The company appears to have resolved historical scheduling issues, but potential fake reviews in the recent batch warrant skepticism about the uniformly positive recent ratings. Customers should obtain multiple quotes and clarify pricing structure upfront before engaging this company.

McCoy Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven primarily by consistent professionalism and technical expertise. The company excels in responsiveness, punctuality, and customer communication, with numerous reviews praising same-day or next-day service and friendly technicians. Pricing is generally perceived as fair and competitive, though some customers report concerns about unexpected charges or upselling. Project completion is solid but shows some variability—most jobs are completed successfully, but a notable minority of reviews cite incomplete work, communication breakdowns, or quality issues requiring callbacks. The company's long-standing reputation and family ownership contribute to customer loyalty.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple empty reviews (text missing) with 5-star ratings on 2022-06-10, 2021-06-10, 2020-06-10, 2019-06-11, 2018-06-11, and 2016-07-21 suggest potential review manipulation or system errors. These 7 reviews lack substantive content and should be weighted with caution.
• CONFLICTING COMPANY IDENTITIES: Reviews reference multiple owner names (Rick, Dave, Cliff, Aaron, J. McCoy) and locations (Charlotte NC, Tyler TX, Moscow ID, Concord NC, Ballantyne NC), suggesting either multiple franchises under the McCoy brand or significant data quality issues. This creates ambiguity about whether all reviews pertain to the same business entity.
• NEGATIVE OUTLIERS WITH CREDIBILITY: Several 1-star reviews provide detailed, specific complaints (e.g., incorrect valve installation, unprofessional behavior, incomplete basement remodel, gas line installation errors, billing disputes). These are not generic complaints and suggest real service failures, not fake negative reviews.
• SAFETY AND CONDUCT CONCERNS: Three reviews mention unsafe or rude behavior by technicians ('Dangerous, rude and unsafe,' 'Jason is rude,' 'Reckless driver'), indicating potential personnel or training issues beyond normal service variance.
• RECENCY BIAS: Approximately 40% of reviews are from 2019 or earlier. Recent reviews (2024-2025) are predominantly 5-star with minimal critical detail, while older reviews show more balanced feedback. This may reflect either improved service or review selection bias.

This WW Score of 82.1 is moderately reliable but should be interpreted with caution due to data quality issues (empty reviews, conflicting company identities across locations) and a notable minority of credible negative reviews documenting significant service failures. The score reflects a company with strong fundamentals in responsiveness and professionalism but inconsistent execution on complex projects and occasional quality control lapses. Prospective customers should verify which specific McCoy Plumbing location they are contacting and review location-specific feedback.