Find Nearby Plumbers In Las Vegas, Nevada

Plumbing Repair Experts receives consistently strong marks across all four dimensions based on 17 reviews spanning approximately 18 months. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with nearly every reviewer explicitly noting responsiveness, punctuality, courteous communication, and a no-upsell approach. Pricing is praised repeatedly as reasonable, fair, and competitive, with multiple reviewers noting they received upfront quotes without requiring an in-person consultation — a differentiator called out positively across many reviews. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished quickly, same-day or next-day, with no reports of abandoned or incomplete work. Experience is evidenced by several reviews describing skilled diagnosis, proper workmanship, and problem-solving beyond the original scope of the job, most notably Tico identifying a secondary hidden leak after completing the primary repair.

• All 17 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed reviews present. While the review content is largely specific and credible, the absence of any critical feedback warrants mild caution.
• Several reviews share similar structural praise patterns (responsive, fair price, quick work, would recommend), which could reflect genuine consistent service quality or mild review curation. No exact phrase duplication was detected, so this is a low-level flag only.
• Two reviews dated 2024-05-09 share the same date and both praise 'Tiko' — this could reflect two separate jobs on the same day or a minor anomaly worth noting.
• One review (2024-11-02) is very brief and generic ('Fast, friendly, and quality work. Even on a busy Saturday!') with no specifics. It contributes minimal evidentiary weight.
• All reviews fall within the past 18 months (March 2024 – November 2024), which is a positive recency signal. No outdated reviews required discounting.

This WW Score is based on 17 reviews with strong recency, specific detail across all four dimensions, and consistent multi-reviewer corroboration, making it a reasonably reliable representation of this contractor's performance, tempered slightly by the absence of any critical reviews and a uniform 5-star rating pattern.

ACC Plumbing (A Campagna) receives consistently strong marks across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, courtesy, clear communication, and responsiveness including nights and weekends. Pricing is a notable differentiator, with multiple reviewers explicitly contrasting ACC's quotes favorably against competitors, including one case saving a customer from an unnecessary $3,500 job and another quoting $1,600 versus a competitor's $7,000. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished promptly, follow-through on callbacks, and warranty provisions, though no reviews mention incomplete or abandoned work. Experience and workmanship are praised across a range of job types from slab leaks and tankless water heater installs to sewer line cleaning and pipe rerouting, with one reviewer specifically noting permit compliance that competitors skipped. The primary caveat is that the majority of reviews are older than 12 months, with only two reviews falling within the past 12 months relative to a current 2025 reference point, which moderately limits confidence in reflecting the contractor's current performance.

• Most reviews are dated between 2016 and 2022, with only one review from 2024 and one from 2022 falling within a recent window. The bulk of data is 3–8 years old and may not reflect current service quality.
• All 16 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed reviews present. While the reviews contain specific details and varied scenarios that reduce suspicion of fabrication, the complete absence of any critical feedback is statistically unusual and warrants mild caution.
• The technician 'Jose' is named in approximately 10 of 16 reviews. This concentration on a single individual means scores may reflect one employee's performance rather than the company as a whole.
• No reviews mention any negative experience, delay, pricing dispute, or incomplete work. While this could reflect genuine quality, it also means there is no data to stress-test the lower end of performance.

The WW Score of 88.6 carries HIGH dimensional confidence based on mention volume, but should be treated with moderate overall trust given that the review pool is heavily skewed toward older dates (pre-2023) and contains no critical feedback whatsoever, which limits its ability to represent the contractor's current and full performance range.

Repipe Plus receives consistently strong marks across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, courteous communication, cleanliness on the job site, and transparency throughout the process. Pricing is notably praised, with multiple reviewers explicitly comparing quotes and finding Repipe Plus to be the best value, particularly given that drywall repair and repainting are included in their bids. Project completion scores are high, with numerous reviewers noting jobs finished in just a few days, including weekend work to minimize disruption, and drywall restoration described as seamless and indistinguishable from original walls. Experience and workmanship are well-documented, with reviewers describing expert-level repiping, skilled drywall texturing, and knowledgeable explanations of the process. The one review with no usable dimension data was a generic thank-you with no specifics.

• All 12 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback, which warrants mild scrutiny. However, most reviews contain specific details (crew names, job types, square footage, number of days, drywall texture matching, mask-wearing, etc.) that are inconsistent with typical fake review patterns, reducing this concern significantly.
• Several reviews are older than 12 months (5 reviews dated before 2023), and two reviews are from 2020 and one from 2019 and 2018. Recency weighting has been applied — older reviews carry less influence on the final score, though they are directionally consistent with recent reviews.
• One review (2018-10-20) is entirely generic ('Your company is the best! We will certainly continue to call you...') with no specific details and was excluded from usable dimension scoring.
• No negative reviews exist in this dataset. This may reflect a curated or filtered review set rather than a complete picture of all customer experiences.

The WW Score of 88.6 carries HIGH overall confidence given the volume of reviews (12), the specificity of detail across most reviews, and consistent corroboration across all four dimensions — however, the absence of any negative feedback and the presence of several older reviews (pre-2022) mean prospective customers should seek additional recent references before committing to a large project.

Andres and his team receive consistently strong marks across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently and enthusiastically cited quality — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, quick response times, friendly demeanor, and clear communication. Pricing is described as competitive, reasonable, and good value across the majority of reviews, with one reviewer even noting they tipped for the quality received. Project completion is well-supported, with jobs described as finished on time, efficiently, and to a high standard across a wide variety of tasks including furniture assembly, TV mounting, fixture installation, and large outdoor structures. Workmanship quality and technical knowledge are praised in multiple reviews, including one instance where Andres identified and corrected a dangerous pre-existing TV mount installation. The only notable caveat is that all reviews are 5-star with uniformly positive sentiment, which warrants mild caution, though the reviews do contain specific job details and varied language that lend them credibility.

• All 10 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback — this pattern warrants mild caution, though the reviews vary in language, detail, and job type, reducing the likelihood of coordinated fake reviews.
• One review refers to the contractor as 'Brian' rather than 'Andres' — this may indicate a different technician or a data entry error, and could slightly affect score attribution consistency.
• One review (2023-06-19) is older than 12 months relative to the most recent review date and has been given slightly reduced weight in scoring, though it remains directionally consistent with more recent reviews.
• No negative reviews are present in this dataset, which limits the engine's ability to identify any weaknesses or failure modes in this contractor's service.

This WW Score carries HIGH overall confidence given that all four dimensions are supported by 6 or more mentions each and the reviews span multiple job types and dates, though the absence of any critical feedback and the all-5-star rating pattern mean the score should be interpreted as a strong positive signal rather than a fully stress-tested assessment.

Superior Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 127 mentions highlighting punctuality, courteous staff, clear communication, and respectful behavior. Project completion is solid with 98 mentions showing jobs finished on time and follow-through on callbacks. Experience scores well with 89 mentions of skilled technicians, problem-solving ability, and technical knowledge. Pricing receives a respectable 82.0 score from 58 mentions, though some customers noted higher-than-expected costs. The company shows particular excellence through named technicians (Keno, Robert, Brandon, Bryce) who are frequently praised for going above and beyond.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple reviews (particularly from 2025-05-10, 2025-04-10, 2025-02-09) contain suspiciously generic praise with minimal specifics, identical structural patterns, and lack of concrete details. However, these are balanced by numerous detailed, specific reviews with verifiable details.
• NEGATIVE OUTLIERS: Five 1-star reviews (2023-06-17, 2023-04-03, 2023-03-21, 2022-11-04, 2019-12-29) describe serious issues including incomplete repairs, damage to property, rude staff, and sanitation hazards. These represent genuine service failures that significantly impact overall trustworthiness.
• RECENCY BIAS: Majority of reviews are from 2024-2025 (approximately 65% of dataset), with older reviews (2015-2019) showing consistently high ratings. Recent negative reviews suggest potential quality control issues.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: While most reviews praise fair pricing, several mention unexpected costs or higher-than-expected bills, suggesting pricing communication may be inconsistent.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 11 reviews contain no text (only 5-star ratings), reducing data quality for analysis.

This WW Score of 88.2 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH confidence. While the company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and project completion backed by extensive evidence (127+ mentions per dimension), the presence of five serious 1-star reviews describing property damage, incomplete work, and poor customer service indicates real operational inconsistencies. The score reflects a company that performs well on average but has documented failure modes that affect reliability. Customers should expect generally professional service but should verify specific technician assignments and obtain detailed written estimates to mitigate risk.

Don the Plumber (DMS Plumbing) demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks. Professionalism is the strongest area, with 98 mentions highlighting punctuality, friendliness, responsiveness, and courteous behavior. Project completion is equally strong with 85 mentions confirming timely job delivery, follow-through on callbacks, and thorough work. Pricing receives strong support from 62 mentions emphasizing fair rates, transparent quotes, and honest value. Experience is well-documented across 71 mentions showcasing technical skill, problem-solving ability, and quality workmanship. The overwhelming majority of reviews are recent (past 3 years), with only 2 negative outliers among 127 total reviews.

• One severe negative review (1-star, 2022-02-28) alleging unprofessional conduct and vehicle aggression. This is a significant outlier and warrants investigation, though it stands alone among 126 other reviews.
• Two empty/blank review texts (2025-01-10, 2017-06-19) with 5-star ratings reduce data quality slightly but do not affect scoring.
• Three reviews with minimal text ('Good', 'Great plumber!', 'Fast') provide limited detail but are consistent with broader patterns.
• High concentration of 5-star reviews (119 of 127) is typical for a well-regarded contractor but suggests potential selection bias in review platform or customer base.
• No evidence of fake review patterns detected. Reviews show varied specific details, different writing styles, and authentic problem descriptions across multiple years.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 125 usable reviews with strong data density across all four dimensions (62-98 mentions each). The consistency of positive feedback over 13+ years, combined with specific technical details and varied customer scenarios, provides robust evidence of sustained quality performance. The single severe negative review is a notable outlier that should be investigated independently but does not materially alter the overall assessment given the overwhelming volume of corroborating positive evidence.