Find Nearby Plumbers In Las Vegas, Nevada

Bosch Plumbing receives consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers repeatedly highlight punctuality, clear communication, responsiveness to emergencies, and courteous behavior from both owner Keegan and technicians like Roman. Pricing is praised across numerous reviews, with multiple customers noting that Bosch came in significantly lower than competing quotes, offered transparent breakdowns, and in one case declined to charge for unnecessary parts. Project completion scores are high, with reviewers consistently reporting that jobs were finished same-day or ahead of schedule, with thorough cleanup and follow-through. Experience is well-documented, with customers and even a third-party drywall professional independently praising the quality and precision of the workmanship. The only moderate caution is that all 31 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative or mixed feedback, which warrants a slight conservative adjustment.

• All 31 reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews — this is statistically unusual and warrants mild scrutiny, though the reviews do contain specific names, job details, and varied language that reduces the likelihood of fabrication.
• Several reviews use similarly enthusiastic superlatives ('best I have ever done business with', 'above and beyond', 'can't go wrong') which is a minor pattern worth noting, though context and specifics differ sufficiently across reviews.
• No reviews mention any service failure, callback issue, or even minor inconvenience — the complete absence of any criticism across 31 reviews reduces confidence slightly per conservative scoring rules.
• Reviews span from 2022 to 2024; the majority (approximately 20+) are from within the past 24 months, with a strong cluster in 2024, which is a positive recency signal.

This WW Score is based on 31 reviews with HIGH mention counts across all four dimensions and strong recency; it is considered reliable, though the universal 5-star pattern with no critical feedback means the score should be treated as a strong positive signal rather than a guaranteed ceiling of performance.

Arturo has an overwhelmingly positive review record across a large volume of reviews spanning multiple years, with the vast majority dated within the past 12 months (2024), lending strong recency weight to the scores. Professionalism is consistently praised — punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness are mentioned explicitly across dozens of reviews, with only two reviews raising concerns (one about a delayed callback and one about a miscommunication regarding scope of work). Pricing is a standout strength, with a large number of reviewers explicitly noting fair, reasonable, or better-than-expected pricing compared to larger companies, and one negative outlier (1-star) who felt a $450 quote for a kitchen sink reinstall was excessive — this was factored in conservatively. Project completion scores are high, supported by numerous accounts of Arturo staying until the job was done correctly, honoring callbacks, and going beyond the original scope; no reviews describe abandoned or incomplete work. Experience scores are among the highest, with reviewers repeatedly citing 30+ years of expertise, problem-solving ability, and the ability to identify and fix issues that other plumbers and handymen missed.

• Two negative reviews exist: one 1-star (June 2024) citing a $450 quote as excessive for a kitchen sink reinstall, and one 1-star (August 2023) citing poor communication about scope of work (tile work). These were factored into scoring and reduce the pricing and professionalism scores slightly.
• One 2-star review (October 2022) cites a failure to follow up after an initial contact — a minor communication concern.
• The overwhelming proportion of 5-star reviews (73 out of 76) warrants a fake review check. However, reviews contain highly specific job details, named locations, unique personal anecdotes, varied writing styles, and span over 3+ years — these are strong indicators of authenticity. No fake review flag is raised.
• A small number of reviews (approximately 5) are older than 24 months (pre-2022) and were given reduced weight in scoring. The majority of reviews are from 2023–2024, supporting high recency confidence.
• One review notes Arturo took longer than the initial time estimate on a remodel job, though the reviewer attributed this to his thoroughness and rated it positively. This was noted but did not materially reduce the project completion score given the overwhelmingly contrary evidence.

This WW Score is highly reliable — it is based on 76 reviews with strong recency, rich detail, varied writing styles, and consistent multi-dimensional feedback across all four scored dimensions, with only minor negative signals that were appropriately weighted.

Salomon demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is exceptionally high, with 9 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and communication—he frequently arrives same-day and maintains a courteous demeanor. Project completion is equally strong, with 9 mentions confirming jobs finished completely, on-time delivery, and follow-through on callbacks. Pricing receives strong marks from 6 reviews describing fair, reasonable, and transparent quotes with no hidden charges. Experience is well-documented across 8 reviews highlighting skilled workmanship, problem-solving ability, and technical knowledge across diverse tasks (plumbing, tile, carpentry, general handyman work). The consistency and specificity of praise across recent reviews (mostly 2024) indicates genuine customer satisfaction.

• All 10 reviews are 5-star or 4-star ratings with no negative feedback—this is unusually positive and warrants caution, though reviews contain specific details and varied project types that suggest authenticity rather than fake reviews
• Name spelling varies across reviews (Salomon, Suliman, Saloman, Solomon)—likely the same person with inconsistent spelling by reviewers, not a red flag
• Two reviews (dates 2023-12-11 and 2023-12-01) are older than 12 months; however, 8 of 10 reviews are from 2024, providing strong recent data

This WW Score of 89.2 is highly reliable, based on 10 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (6–9 mentions each) and predominantly recent data from 2024. The consistency of specific, detailed praise across diverse project types and the absence of any negative feedback support confidence in this score, though the uniformly positive rating distribution should be monitored for future reviews to confirm sustained performance.

Pipe Dreams Plumbing demonstrates overwhelmingly strong performance across all four scored dimensions, supported by a large and detailed review base spanning over a decade. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courtesy, shoe booties, cleanliness, and responsiveness — including the owner personally calling back within minutes. Project completion scores are high, with numerous reviews confirming same-day or next-day service, jobs finished on time or early, and the company honoring its work with follow-up visits. Experience is well-documented through technically complex jobs including slab leaks, main water line replacements, and multi-visit leak diagnostics, with reviewers and even a city inspector commenting on workmanship quality. Pricing scores slightly lower than other dimensions due to one explicit complaint about overcharging on labor (2-star review, Feb 2020) and one reviewer noting prices are 'on the higher side,' though the overwhelming majority describe pricing as fair, competitive, or the lowest among multiple quotes.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The detailed 'Vinny' review (listing kitchen faucet, garbage disposal, water main, etc.) appears twice with nearly identical text — dated 2024-06-08 and 2024-02-23. This may indicate a duplicate submission or a copy-paste error, not necessarily a fake review, but it was counted only once for scoring purposes.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: The review 'Jason runs a great company. Always responsive to any questions, and very knowledgeable & honest!' appears twice — dated 2020-06-09 and 2019-09-26. Counted only once.
• BLANK/EMPTY REVIEWS: Seven reviews contain no text (only a star rating). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• SINGLE-WORD/MINIMAL REVIEWS: Several reviews contain only a name initial ('E'), a very brief phrase ('Very well.', 'On time and professional.'), or a first-name mention with no detail. These were treated as low-signal and only contributed to dimensions where explicit evidence existed.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — PRICING (Feb 2020, 2-star): One reviewer explicitly complained about being charged substantially more than expected for a water heater replacement, citing $353 for 2 hours of journeyman labor and unresolved billing dispute. This was factored into the pricing score.
• NEGATIVE REVIEW — CONTEXT FLAG (Aug 2020, 1-star): One review appears to be a business dispute response from the owner, not a customer review. It references an employee named Simon and an alleged extortion threat. This review was excluded from dimension scoring as it does not reflect a customer service experience.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of high-detail reviews are from 2021–2025, which is positive. However, a subset of reviews reference technicians named 'Josh,' 'George,' 'Travis,' and 'Scott' who do not appear in recent reviews, suggesting possible staff turnover or business evolution over the years. Older reviews (2010–2016) may reflect a different operational period.
• REFERRAL-ONLY REVIEWS: A notable pattern exists where Chance refers customers to other companies when he cannot help. Multiple 5-star reviews are written by customers who never actually received service. While this reflects strong integrity and character, these reviews were not counted toward project completion or experience scores.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Despite the high volume of 5-star reviews, the majority contain specific names, job details, dates, and unique narratives. The review corpus does not exhibit the hallmarks of coordinated fake reviews.

This WW Score is based on a large, detailed, and largely authentic review corpus spanning 14+ years, with the bulk of high-quality evidence concentrated in the past 3 years, making it a highly reliable indicator of consistent contractor performance — tempered only slightly by one substantiated pricing complaint and a small number of blank or minimal reviews.

9th Island Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — punctuality, friendly communication, and courteous demeanor are mentioned in the vast majority of reviews. Pricing is a notable differentiator, with multiple reviewers explicitly comparing 9th Island favorably against competitors and citing significant savings, including one reviewer who saved approximately $14,000 and another who was charged only $125 versus $800–$1,000 quoted elsewhere. Project completion scores are strong, with same-day and next-day service completions referenced repeatedly, and no reviews citing abandoned or incomplete work. Experience and technical skill are affirmed across a range of job types — water heater replacements, main line repairs, gas line work, leak detection with infrared cameras, and disposal repairs — though this dimension is mentioned less frequently than professionalism and completion. One minor lateness incident was noted in a single review but was framed positively overall.

• 4 reviews contained no text whatsoever — only a 5-star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• The review corpus is 100% 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews, which is statistically unusual for a business with 101 reviews. This warrants mild caution, though the majority of reviews contain specific names, job details, and situational context that are consistent with authentic experiences.
• Several reviews share similar structural praise patterns (responsive owner, friendly technician, fair price, highly recommend), which could reflect genuine brand consistency or mild review coaching. No exact duplicate phrasing was detected, so no score reduction was applied, but this pattern is noted.
• The review dated 2024-08-07 describes a customer who initially gave 3 stars due to pricing concerns but updated to 5 stars after receiving a full refund offer from the owner. This review reflects a positive resolution but also confirms at least one instance where pricing was perceived as high for the scope of work — this was factored into the pricing score conservatively.
• All reviews fall within the past 12–24 months with the majority from 2024–2025, which is favorable for recency weighting. No significant degradation in sentiment over time was detected.

This WW Score is based on a large, detailed, and recent review set with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions, making it one of the more reliable scores producible under this framework — though the absence of any negative reviews and the uniformly 5-star rating distribution introduce a mild credibility caveat that prevents a top-tier score assignment.

Plumbing Legends / Plumbing Upgrade receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four scored dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — reviewers consistently praise punctuality, communication, cleanliness, and courteous behavior. Pricing is a notable competitive advantage, with multiple reviewers explicitly stating this company quoted thousands less than competitors and in some cases charged less than originally quoted. Project completion scores are strong, with numerous accounts of same-day or next-day service, emergency responsiveness, and jobs finished on time with no abandoned work; one reviewer also noted that two small post-job issues were resolved within hours. Technical experience is well-documented across a wide range of job types — from whole-house repipes and slab leak repairs to water heater replacements and minor fixture fixes — with reviewers frequently noting that work was done 'the right way, not the easy way.' The review set spans from 2016 to 2025, which introduces some recency concerns, though recent 2024–2025 reviews remain consistent in tone and quality.

• ALL 35 reviews are 5-star ratings with zero negative or mixed reviews — this is statistically unusual for a contractor with this volume of reviews and warrants mild skepticism.
• Several reviews use near-identical phrasing such as 'done the right way, not the easy way' appearing in two separate reviews (Feb 2025 and Jan 2025), which may suggest coached or templated responses.
• A cluster of 7 reviews posted within a 2-day window (2025-01-09 to 2025-01-10) and another cluster of 3 reviews on the same date (2025-02-09) is unusual and may indicate a solicited review campaign.
• The business appears to have operated under at least two names — 'Plumbing Legends' and 'Plumbing Upgrade' — and multiple technician names appear (Kevin, Alex, Jeff, Julian, Mike, Jivko, Dennis), which may reflect a legitimate business evolution but should be noted for transparency.
• RECENCY NOTE: Approximately 14 of 35 reviews are older than 3 years (pre-2022), with several dating back to 2016–2018. While older reviews are consistent in quality, they carry reduced weight in the scoring calculation.

The WW Score of 88.6 is supported by a high volume of detailed, specific reviews across all four dimensions, but should be interpreted with moderate caution due to the suspicious clustering of same-date reviews, universal 5-star ratings with no negative feedback, and some repeated phrasing that may indicate coached responses.