Find Nearby Plumbers In Las Vegas, Nevada

Kingdom Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance driven by consistently high marks in professionalism, project completion, and technical expertise. The company excels at punctuality, communication, workmanship quality, and customer service, with extensive evidence across 87+ reviews praising professional technicians like Sergio, Javier, and Jason. However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness, with multiple customers reporting aggressive upselling tactics, non-itemized quotes, inflated labor charges, and pressure toward premium service plans. While most recent reviews (past 12 months) are highly positive, the pricing concerns are concentrated in recent complaints that suggest systemic issues with sales practices rather than isolated incidents.

• PRICING PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple independent reviews (at least 4 distinct customers) report identical problematic pricing behaviors: aggressive upselling toward most expensive options, refusal to itemize quotes, labor charges 2-3x market rate for simple jobs ($258 per faucet install vs. $125 market rate; $9,000 water heater quote vs. $1,975 competitor; $250 gas stub connection vs. $145 competitor), and pressure to enroll in 'Royal Treatment Membership' program. This suggests systemic sales practices rather than isolated incidents.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - MODERATE: Approximately 40+ reviews from 2019-2025 contain suspiciously generic praise with minimal specifics ('amazing,' 'great job,' 'highly recommend' with no detail). However, these are interspersed with detailed, specific reviews and include named technicians (Sergio, Javier, Jason, Porter, etc.) with consistent positive mentions across multiple reviews, reducing but not eliminating concern. The pattern suggests some reviews may be solicited/encouraged rather than organic.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 3 reviews contain only ratings (5.0, 5.0, 4.0) with no text, making them unusable for dimension scoring.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW: One review (school facility experience) appears twice verbatim on 2024-08-13 and 2024-07-09, suggesting possible data duplication.
• RECENCY BIAS NOTED: 70+ reviews are from past 12 months (2024-2025), with most 5-star ratings. However, the most recent pricing complaints (May 2025, July 2024) are among the most detailed and damaging, suggesting current business practices may not align with historical reputation.
• CONFLICTING PRICING SIGNALS: Some reviews explicitly praise 'very reasonable' or 'fair' pricing (15+ mentions), while others report extreme overcharging. This suggests pricing varies significantly by job type, sales representative, or customer negotiation skill, indicating inconsistent pricing strategy.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for assessing technical competence and professionalism (HIGH confidence based on 87+ detailed mentions), but should be interpreted cautiously regarding overall value proposition due to documented pricing concerns (MODERATE confidence, 12 mentions) that appear to be systematic rather than anecdotal. Customers should expect excellent workmanship and service but should obtain detailed, itemized quotes and compare with competitors before committing, as pricing appears to be negotiable and frequently inflated relative to market rates.

One Stop Services earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with the majority of reviewers praising polite, knowledgeable technicians and same-day or rapid response times. Pricing is a consistent highlight, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting reasonable rates, no hidden fees, and favorable comparisons to competitors. Project completion scores are solid but tempered by a meaningful pattern of no-show and no-callback complaints across at least four reviews, including two 1-star reviews describing missed appointments with no follow-up, which represents a real reliability risk. Experience scores are high, with numerous reviewers describing technicians who quickly diagnosed and resolved complex clogs, tree root intrusions, and frozen pipe situations. One isolated 1-star review from 2014 citing rude behavior and one vague 1-star review ('Dangerously dishonest silent assassins') with no supporting detail were noted but given limited weight due to age and lack of specificity respectively.

• NO-SHOW PATTERN: At least 4 reviews (2 rated 1-star, 1 rated 3-star, 1 rated 1-star) describe technicians failing to appear during scheduled appointment windows with no call or follow-up. This is a recurring operational issue, not an isolated incident, and meaningfully reduces the project_completion score.
• DUPLICATE REVIEW DETECTED: Two reviews (dated 2022-06-10 and 2022-05-19) are nearly identical in content, both describing Spencer/Spenser fixing a minor issue and charging nothing, with nearly word-for-word phrasing. This may indicate a duplicated submission or a coordinated review. Confidence in those two specific reviews is reduced.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Two reviews contain no text (only a 5-star rating, dated 2024-06-09 and 2022-06-10). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from 2022–2025 and are therefore considered current. The 2014 rude-behavior complaint was given minimal weight due to age. The no-show complaints span 2021–2022, suggesting the issue may have been more prevalent in that period; no no-show complaints appear in 2023–2025 reviews.
• VAGUE NEGATIVE REVIEW: The 1-star review stating 'Dangerously dishonest silent assassins' (2021) provides no factual detail and cannot be scored or verified. It was flagged but not weighted in scoring.
• CALLBACK POSITIVE: One 5-star review (2023) and one 3-star review (2022) both describe initial service failures followed by prompt callbacks and resolution at no charge, which partially offsets the no-show pattern and reflects positively on accountability.

This WW Score is based on 50 reviews with usable data spanning 2014–2025, with strong representation from the past 12–36 months, giving it HIGH overall confidence; however, the recurring no-show pattern across multiple reviews is a verified operational risk that prospective customers should weigh seriously.

Andrews Plumbing receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across all four dimensions, with professionalism and pricing being the most frequently praised attributes. Paul is consistently described as punctual, friendly, communicative, and honest — qualities that appear in the vast majority of reviews. Pricing is a standout strength, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting that his quotes came in hundreds to nearly a thousand dollars below competing estimates, and that he honored original quotes even when jobs extended longer than expected. Project completion is strong, with reviewers describing jobs finished on time, callbacks honored, and work done correctly the first time — however, two negative reviews (a 2-star and a 1-star) cite failure to respond or return calls, which introduces a modest reliability concern around responsiveness and availability. Workmanship quality is praised in detail across many reviews, including precision jackhammer work, gas line installations passing inspection, and complex re-piping jobs completed professionally.

• Two negative reviews (1-star and 2-star) specifically cite failure to respond to calls or refusal to take on jobs, suggesting occasional availability or responsiveness issues that contrast with the otherwise positive pattern.
• A large cluster of reviews share the same date of 2018-06-11, which may indicate reviews were submitted in bulk or migrated from another platform. These reviews are generally brief and lack specific job details, which slightly reduces their individual evidential weight.
• The majority of reviews (roughly 25 of 35) are older than 12 months from the most recent review date of 2025-03-11, with a heavy concentration between 2015 and 2020. Only 3 reviews are from the past 12 months (2024-2025), limiting confidence in how current the overall picture is.
• No fake review pattern detected beyond the date clustering noted above. Most reviews contain specific job details, named individuals, and varied language, which supports authenticity.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews with high mention counts across all four dimensions, but should be interpreted with moderate caution due to the age of most reviews, a cluster of same-date submissions, and two credible negative reviews citing unresponsiveness.

Will's Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven primarily by exceptional technical expertise and consistent professionalism across most engagements. The company excels in experience and problem-solving, with multiple reviews highlighting the ability to diagnose and fix complex issues that other plumbers could not resolve. Professionalism is solid with punctual arrivals, courteous technicians, and clean work practices. However, pricing shows more variability with some customers reporting fair value while others cite excessive charges and questionable billing practices. Project completion has notable gaps, with at least two significant failures (incomplete tankless water heater installation, misdiagnosed toilet repair) that undermine confidence despite many successful jobs.

• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: Two critical project completion failures (2021-05-31 tankless heater not connected; 2023-09-18 toilet misdiagnosis with $129 charge) suggest inconsistent quality control despite predominantly positive reviews.
• BILLING DISPUTES: Multiple reviews (2024-04-09, 2023-09-18) explicitly mention unfair pricing, inflated charges, and questionable billing practices. One customer reports owner 'charges whatever he wants' and uses worker punch-clock manipulation to justify inflated hours.
• COMMUNICATION GAPS: 2024-04-09 review indicates owner fails to properly brief workers on job scope, leading to incomplete work and wasted customer time.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most positive reviews are from 2017-2022 (older than 1 year). Recent reviews (2024, 2023) show more critical feedback on pricing and completion, suggesting possible service degradation.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Several reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('highly recommend', 'stop looking and call them', 'best plumber/plumbing company') and lack specific technical details, though this is partially offset by detailed negative reviews that appear authentic.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while the sample size is adequate (31 reviews) and confidence levels are high across dimensions, the presence of recent critical failures in project completion, explicit billing disputes, and a notable shift toward negative feedback in 2023-2024 suggests the company's current performance may be lower than the historical average. The score reflects a mixed portfolio where technical expertise remains strong but operational consistency and pricing transparency have deteriorated.

Chris' Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous communication across 18 reviews. Project completion is solid with most jobs finished on time and to specification, though two negative reviews (1-star and 2-star) reveal significant issues including incomplete work, poor follow-up, and scheduling failures that temper this dimension. Technical expertise is evident across 12 mentions, with reviewers praising diagnostic skills and problem-solving ability. Pricing appears fair and transparent based on 6 mentions, with several customers noting competitive or below-quote charges. The presence of two serious negative reviews (incomplete job, poor communication, no follow-up; and cancellation/lateness issues) prevents a higher overall score despite overwhelming 5-star ratings.

• 23 of 25 reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative detail, suggesting potential review selection bias or fake review patterns. The two negative reviews (1-star and 2-star) provide specific, credible complaints that contrast sharply with generic praise in most positive reviews.
• Most reviews lack specific dates (13 of 25 have no date provided), making recency assessment difficult. Dated reviews range from 2011–2022, with older reviews (2011–2017) showing only praise while undated reviews show both extremes.
• The 1-star review describes serious issues (incomplete work, poor cleanup, no follow-up, excuses) that are credible and detailed, suggesting real problems despite overwhelmingly positive sentiment elsewhere.
• The 2-star review documents specific failures (cancellation 20 minutes before appointment, 2-hour lateness, poor office communication) that indicate operational inconsistency.
• High concentration of generic praise language ('awesome,' 'great,' 'professional') across many reviews without specific technical detail raises authenticity concerns, though the two negative reviews appear genuine.

This score should be treated with moderate caution. While the HIGH confidence is supported by 18+ mentions per dimension, the overwhelming concentration of 5-star reviews with minimal specificity, combined with two credible negative reviews documenting serious failures (incomplete work, poor follow-up, scheduling issues), suggests the true performance may be more variable than the 82.1 score indicates. The company appears capable of excellent work but has demonstrated significant operational and follow-through failures in at least two documented cases.

Downunder Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with particular strength in professionalism and responsiveness. Rob consistently receives praise for punctuality, friendly demeanor, and quick response times across 18 reviews. Project completion is solid with multiple mentions of same-day or next-day service and jobs completed efficiently. Pricing is a notable strength with 13 reviews explicitly calling out fair, reasonable, or competitive rates. However, one significant 1-star review from March 2024 documents a serious billing dispute where the customer was charged $275 for an estimate without prior agreement, which substantially impacts the overall score and raises concerns about pricing transparency practices.

• CRITICAL: One recent negative review (2024-03-11) documents alleged unauthorized billing of $275 for estimate/investigation without prior agreement. This directly contradicts the overwhelmingly positive pricing narrative and suggests potential billing practice issues that warrant investigation.
• RECENCY CONCERN: 16 of 25 reviews are from 2019 or earlier (64% older than 5 years). Only 2 reviews from 2024 and 1 from 2023. The recent negative review may indicate a change in business practices or isolated incident.
• POTENTIAL PATTERN: Multiple reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('Aussie Rob', 'doesn't rip people off', 'honest and reliable', 'great prices'). While not conclusive evidence of fake reviews, the consistency is notable. However, these are balanced by the detailed negative review which appears authentic.
• GENERIC PRAISE: Several reviews lack specific detail about the actual work performed (e.g., 'They are the best in town!!!!!!!!!!'), though most reviews do provide concrete examples of service quality.

This score should be treated with MODERATE caution. While 24 of 25 reviews are highly positive and support an 82+ score, the recent March 2024 billing dispute is a material red flag that contradicts the pricing strength narrative and suggests the score may not reflect current business practices. The age of most reviews (pre-2020) further limits confidence in current performance. Recommend verifying current billing practices and investigating the disputed estimate charge before engaging this contractor.