Find Nearby Plumbers In Las Vegas, Nevada

Done Right Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with extensive evidence of punctuality, courteous communication, and respectful behavior. Pricing is competitive and transparent, though some customers report higher costs relative to alternatives. Project completion is consistently reliable with same-day or next-day service delivery and thorough follow-up. Technical expertise is evident across complex jobs including water main replacements, sewer line work, and emergency repairs. However, a notable minority of negative reviews (approximately 4% of total) document service failures, no-shows, and occasional unprofessional behavior that prevent a higher score.

• Approximately 17 reviews (4.1%) contain 1-star ratings describing serious service failures: no-shows, unprofessional technician behavior, incomplete work, and refusal to honor commitments. These are distributed across different time periods and appear to reflect genuine customer dissatisfaction rather than fake reviews.
• Several reviews mention the same technician names (Ray, Miguel, Steve, Ben, Malikai, Ashton) receiving consistent praise, suggesting strong individual performers carry the company reputation. Conversely, some negative reviews cite specific technicians, indicating inconsistent quality across the team.
• A small cluster of reviews (3-4) from 2022 describe property-related complaints unrelated to plumbing work quality (parking disputes, horn honking), suggesting potential workplace culture or management issues.
• Two reviews describe billing disputes: one customer charged $400 for a 5-minute fix, another charged $1200 for a P-trap replacement (customer self-repaired for <$20). These suggest occasional overpricing on minor jobs.
• Multiple reviews from 2021-2025 show high concentration of 5-star ratings with generic praise language ('amazing,' 'excellent,' 'highly recommend'), but these are supported by specific job details and technician names, reducing concern about fake reviews. The volume and consistency of positive reviews across 10+ years suggests genuine customer satisfaction rather than fabrication.
• Recency bias noted: Reviews from past 12 months (June 2024-June 2025) are predominantly 5-star with minimal negative feedback, while older reviews (2018-2023) show more balanced distribution including legitimate 1-2 star complaints. This may reflect improved operations or selection bias in recent reviews.

This WW Score of 82.3 is highly reliable, based on 408 usable reviews with strong data density across all four dimensions. The company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and technical expertise, supported by consistent evidence across hundreds of reviews spanning 15+ years. However, the score appropriately reflects a meaningful minority of documented service failures and no-shows that prevent a higher rating. Customers should expect generally professional, competent service at fair-to-moderate pricing, but should be aware of occasional inconsistency in execution and rare instances of unprofessional behavior.

Jack Dish Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions, with particular strength in professionalism (87.2) driven by consistent praise for punctuality, friendly demeanor, and responsive communication from staff like Jennifer and technicians. Project completion scores (84.1) reflect reliable job finishing and follow-through, though a small number of callbacks and incomplete work incidents slightly temper this score. Pricing (78.5) is generally viewed as fair and competitive, but concerns about deposit policies, surprise charges, and occasional overpricing for certain services create moderate variability. Experience (85.3) is consistently validated through skilled technicians and quality workmanship, with named plumbers like Nelson, Kevin, and David receiving frequent praise. The company benefits from high review volume (281 reviews) with predominantly recent data (majority from 2021 onward), providing strong statistical confidence.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Two identical reviews dated 2025-06-03 and 2025-06-01 appear verbatim, suggesting possible data duplication rather than fake reviews.
• MULTIPLE BLANK REVIEWS: 8 reviews contain only ratings (5.0 or 4.0) with no text content, limiting data quality for those entries.
• NEGATIVE OUTLIERS: 8 one-star reviews describe serious issues including rude staff, abandoned jobs, illegal deposit practices, and poor workmanship. These are credible and specific complaints that warrant attention.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews mention surprise charges, overtime fees not disclosed upfront, and deposit policy violations (50% non-refundable deposits contrary to Nevada law). This suggests potential systemic pricing communication issues.
• SENIOR DISCOUNT COMPLAINTS: At least 3 reviews specifically criticize misleading senior discount advertising (advertised but only $10 off $950+ bills, approximately 1% rather than standard 5-10%).
• CALLBACK PATTERN: Several reviews mention needing multiple visits to complete one job or technicians lacking necessary parts, suggesting occasional resource planning issues.
• RECENCY BIAS MITIGATED: While most reviews are recent (2021-2025), the dataset includes substantial historical data (2016-2020) showing consistent performance patterns over time, reducing recency concerns.

This WW Score of 82.3 is highly reliable, based on 281 reviews with strong data across all dimensions and high confidence levels (all dimensions rated HIGH). The company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and experience, but the score appropriately reflects legitimate concerns about pricing transparency and occasional service gaps. The presence of credible negative reviews prevents artificial inflation and suggests the score reflects authentic customer experience rather than curated feedback.

MC Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all four dimensions, with particular strength in professionalism and experience. The company excels at responsiveness, punctuality, and technical competence, with numerous reviews praising specific technicians by name (David, Miguel, Scott, Homero, etc.). Pricing is generally perceived as fair and reasonable, though some customers note it is not the cheapest option available. Project completion is solid with same-day and next-day service frequently mentioned. However, a notable minority of negative reviews (approximately 8-10%) reveal serious concerns including missed appointments, poor communication, overcharging, incomplete repairs requiring callbacks, and in rare cases, unprofessional behavior from ownership.

• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews dated 2025-06-08, 2025-06-06, and 2025-05-30 contain two identical reviews with verbatim text ('Put simply, if you aren't using MC Plumbing...' and 'They were quick to fix the problem and very reasonable priced'). This repetition across multiple dates suggests possible review manipulation. Confidence in recent 5-star reviews should be treated with caution.
• SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE REVIEWS: Multiple 1-star reviews document serious issues including: missed appointments without communication (2025-05-30, 2019-11-23), owner using profanity and threatening liens (2024-03-29), overcharging and poor follow-up (2023-09-09, 2021-08-07), incomplete repairs (2021-11-01), and unprofessional diagnostic work (2022-09-20, 2022-08-25). These are not isolated complaints.
• RECENCY CONCERN: While most recent reviews (2025) are overwhelmingly positive, the presence of duplicate/suspicious reviews in this period warrants caution. Older reviews (2018-2023) show more balanced feedback with legitimate complaints.
• QUALITY CONTROL VARIABILITY: Reviews frequently praise specific technicians by name (David, Miguel, Homero, Scott) while criticizing others. This suggests inconsistent quality depending on which technician is assigned, indicating potential management or training issues.
• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple reviews mention being overcharged or surprised by final costs exceeding estimates. Some customers report paying significantly more than competitors for similar work, suggesting pricing transparency may be an issue.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable for understanding MC Plumbing's typical performance, but should be interpreted with awareness that the company shows high variability: excellent service from certain technicians and management, but documented serious failures in communication, pricing transparency, and follow-through from others. The suspicious duplicate reviews in the most recent period (June 2025) reduce confidence in the very latest feedback. Prospective customers should expect generally good service but should verify pricing in writing and confirm appointment details before committing.

Sunrise Service demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.3, driven primarily by consistently high marks in professionalism (85.2) and technical experience (86.8). The company excels at punctuality, communication, and technician knowledge, with many customers praising specific technicians by name and requesting them for future service. Project completion is solid at 84.1, though some older reviews mention follow-up issues and callback delays. The primary weakness is pricing (71.5), with multiple customers reporting unexpectedly high charges, lack of transparency in quotes, and perceived overcharging for parts and labor—particularly for emergency/weekend services. This pricing concern is the most consistent negative theme across reviews.

• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple identical or near-identical reviews appear in the dataset (e.g., the Christopher/bathroom faucet review, Steve/pictures review, Mike/AC review, Edgar/AC review, Juan Pogan review, Karieffe review, Mike Lawrence review, Steven review, Jason review, Juan Pogan detailed review all appear 2-3 times with identical or near-identical text). This suggests either duplicate submissions or potential review manipulation. Confidence in scores reduced slightly due to this pattern.
• PRICING CONCERNS: At least 12 reviews explicitly criticize pricing as unfair, opaque, or exploitative. Complaints include: $300 for 15-minute service, $700 for capacitor/fan blade (customer's HVAC expert son said should cost ~$100), $180 labor fee for warranty work, $4,700 quote for repairs, $165 capacitor (costs $12 on Amazon), and lack of upfront pricing transparency. This is the most consistent negative theme.
• EMERGENCY SERVICE FAILURES: Multiple reviews (at least 5) report failure to respond to 24/7 emergency calls, delayed callbacks, and poor after-hours service despite advertising emergency availability. This is a significant service gap.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most recent reviews (June 2025) are overwhelmingly 5-star with generic praise and minimal detail, contrasting sharply with older reviews which contain more specific criticism and balanced feedback. Recent reviews may reflect a concentrated positive campaign or review solicitation.
• WARRANTY DISPUTES: At least 3 reviews mention warranty denial or disputes, including one customer who was told yearly maintenance was required but never informed of this condition upfront.
• INCONSISTENT TECHNICIAN QUALITY: While many technicians are praised individually, some reviews report poor attitudes, dishonesty, and unprofessional behavior from other technicians, suggesting inconsistent quality control.

This WW Score of 82.3 is moderately reliable but should be interpreted with caution due to detected duplicate reviews, a significant recent surge in generic 5-star reviews, and consistent pricing complaints that may not be fully reflected in the overall score. The company demonstrates genuine strengths in professionalism and technical expertise, but customers should carefully verify pricing upfront and be aware of documented emergency service gaps and potential warranty condition surprises.

Signature Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.3, driven by consistently high marks in professionalism (86.5) and project completion (84.0). The company excels at punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous service, with owner Jim Davies and technicians like Ed frequently praised for going above and beyond. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (76.0), with multiple customers citing high service call fees ($79–$89), expensive labor rates, and quotes significantly above competitors. While most jobs are completed successfully and on time, a subset of negative reviews highlights concerns about incomplete diagnostics, follow-up issues, and occasional quality control problems. The company's long-standing reputation and high volume of positive reviews (130+ five-star ratings) outweigh the legitimate pricing and service consistency concerns.

• PRICING CONCERNS: Multiple reviews (at least 8) explicitly criticize high service call fees ($79–$89), labor rates ($149/hr), and quotes 2–3x higher than competitors. This is the most consistent complaint across negative reviews.
• QUALITY CONTROL INCONSISTENCY: Several reviews report incomplete work on first visit, requiring callbacks (e.g., shower leak not fully fixed, drain issues recurring, leak detection equipment not available despite being advertised).
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: A small cluster of reviews (approximately 5–7) from June 2025 and May 2025 use nearly identical phrasing ('freakin fabulous,' 'reasonably priced,' 'professional and knowledgeable') and all rate 5.0 stars with minimal specific detail. These may warrant skepticism, though the bulk of the review corpus appears authentic.
• FOLLOW-UP ISSUES: At least 3 reviews mention promised follow-ups that never materialized (e.g., water hammer arrestor research, warranty information).
• RECENCY NOTE: Most reviews are from 2012–2020, with a spike in 5-star reviews in June 2025. Reviews from the past 12 months are limited; older reviews (2012–2019) dominate the dataset and may not reflect current service levels.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable and should be trusted as a fair assessment. The score is based on 151 reviews with strong data density across all dimensions (42–98 mentions per dimension), and the narrative is supported by explicit evidence from customer feedback. However, the pricing dimension (76.0) is particularly well-documented and represents a genuine weakness; prospective customers should expect higher costs than competitors. The company's professionalism and project completion scores are robust, but the presence of quality control inconsistencies and a small cluster of potentially fabricated recent reviews suggests caution when evaluating the most recent claims.

Hydro Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with consistently punctual arrivals, excellent communication, and courteous technicians across 98 reviews. Project completion is reliable with most jobs finished on time and follow-through honored, though a few instances of poor communication during multi-day jobs were noted. Technical expertise is solid with skilled diagnostics and quality workmanship. However, pricing emerges as a significant weakness: while many customers report fair rates, a notable subset (32 mentions) explicitly criticize pricing as high, with complaints about diagnostic fees, upselling, and quotes substantially exceeding market rates. This pricing inconsistency is the primary factor limiting the overall score.

• PRICING INCONSISTENCY: Multiple customers report being charged significantly above market rates ($230 for basic faucet swap vs. $90-160 elsewhere; $552.20 for snaking vs. $125-150 market rate; $1500 water heater install vs. $425 competitors). This suggests either inconsistent pricing practices or selective upselling.
• DIAGNOSTIC FEE DISPUTES: Three separate reviews (2023-11-07, 2023-03-29, 2021-11-05) report confusion or dissatisfaction with upfront diagnostic/estimate fees ($75-$140), with at least one customer reporting conflicting information about whether fees were free or paid.
• COMMUNICATION GAPS: One detailed review (2022-06-22) describes poor communication during a multi-day main water line project—crew left without notification, returned without notice, and a worker took a nap in the yard. Another review (2021-07-13) alleges price fumbling/upselling during the service call.
• QUALITY CONTROL ISSUES: Two reviews describe improper diagnosis leading to unnecessary charges (2022-11-19) and one describes a technician allegedly causing a water heater failure to justify a $250 repair (2021-10-02).
• FAKE REVIEW RISK - MODERATE: Approximately 40% of reviews are extremely brief (1-3 sentences) with generic praise and no specifics (e.g., 'Great guy for a quick repair,' 'Miguel was phenomenal!'). While not conclusive, the high volume of vague 5-star reviews with minimal detail is atypical and warrants caution. However, the presence of detailed negative reviews and specific complaints suggests the dataset is not entirely fabricated.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most reviews are from 2022-2025 (past 2-3 years), with fewer from 2020-2021. Recent reviews (June 2025) continue to show the same pattern of high professionalism but pricing concerns.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable for assessing professionalism and project completion (HIGH confidence), but should be interpreted cautiously regarding overall value: Hydro Plumbing excels in service quality and technical skill, but customers should expect pricing to be 25-100% above market rates for standard work, with potential for diagnostic fees and upselling. The score reflects strong execution but does not fully capture the pricing friction that affects customer satisfaction.