Find Nearby Plumbers In St. Louis, Missouri

Drain King demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.3, driven by consistently high marks across all dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength (85.2), with extensive evidence of punctuality, courteous technicians, and clean work practices across 187 mentions. Project completion is solid (84.6) with most jobs finished efficiently and on-time. Experience scores well (83.4) with technicians demonstrating strong diagnostic and problem-solving skills. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (73.1), with recurring complaints about high costs, unexpected charges, and price increases. While the majority of reviews are highly positive, the pricing concerns and scattered negative experiences prevent a higher overall score.

• PRICING VOLATILITY: Multiple reviews cite significant price increases (e.g., $165→$370 first hour), unexpected charges beyond quotes, and complaints of overcharging. This is the most consistent negative theme.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE QUALITY: While most reviews are 5-star, there are scattered 1-star reviews citing rude technicians, incomplete work, no-shows, and poor follow-up. Some appear to involve specific technicians (e.g., Santo, Richie Shaw) rather than systemic issues.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Approximately 15-20 reviews from March-June 2025 are extremely generic with identical phrasing ('professional,' 'efficient,' 'highly recommend,' 'no mess'), minimal detail, and suspiciously clustered dates. These lack specificity typical of genuine reviews and may inflate scores artificially.
• DUPLICATE REVIEWS: Three nearly identical reviews from David Cioto (March 9, 2024) appear to be duplicates or near-duplicates, suggesting possible review manipulation.
• EMPTY/MINIMAL REVIEWS: Multiple reviews contain no text or only ratings, making them unusable for scoring but inflating review count.
• RECENCY BIAS: Most recent reviews (2025) are overwhelmingly positive 5-star; older reviews (2010-2018) show more balanced criticism, suggesting either genuine improvement or review curation.
• GEOGRAPHIC INCONSISTENCY: Reviews reference multiple service areas (Whittier CA, Haverhill MA, NH, Plaistow, Fridley MN), suggesting either multiple franchises or inconsistent branding, which may explain service quality variance.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable for overall assessment but should be interpreted cautiously: the HIGH confidence is supported by large mention counts across all dimensions, but the score is artificially elevated by a cluster of suspicious generic reviews from early 2025 and potentially inflated by review curation. The pricing dimension (73.1) is the most trustworthy negative finding, backed by specific, detailed complaints spanning multiple years. Prospective customers should expect strong professionalism and technical competence but should obtain detailed written quotes and clarify all pricing terms upfront before engaging services.

Excel Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.3, driven by consistently high marks in professionalism (85.2), experience/skill (86.4), and project completion (84.6). The company excels at punctuality, communication, technical knowledge, and work quality, with numerous reviews praising specific technicians like Luke, Yuri, Bob, and Kevin. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (72.1), with recurring complaints about high costs, unexpected charges, and perceived overpricing relative to the work performed. While most recent reviews (past 12 months) are highly positive, older reviews reveal persistent pricing concerns and occasional service failures that have not been fully resolved.

• PRICING CONCERNS: Multiple reviews (spanning 2014-2025) report unexpectedly high quotes, hidden charges, and perceived overpricing. Examples include $450 for 20 minutes of drain work, $250 for a simple faucet replacement, $500 for toilet flange/wax ring, and significant quote increases after initial estimates. This pattern suggests systemic pricing transparency issues.
• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Reviews dated 2025-06-05 through 2025-06-08 include 3 empty reviews with 5-star ratings and 2 identical reviews with identical phrasing ('I spoke with Lori, who was very friendly and helpful. She got back to me within minutes, fantastic response time. The overall experience was excellent, and the price I was quoted felt great. Highly recommend!') dated 2025-06-07 and 2025-06-05. This suggests potential review manipulation or duplicate submissions.
• SERVICE FAILURES: Several reviews document incomplete work, follow-up failures, and quality issues. Examples include: ejector pump not resealed/reconnected properly (2024-06-15), sewage left on floor after drain cleaning (2023-08-17), sump line misdiagnosis leaving customer worse off (2022-05-04), and multiple instances of plumbers not following up on promised estimates (2020-07-25, 2016-08-08).
• INCONSISTENT QUALITY: While many reviews praise specific technicians, others report poor workmanship from different technicians at the same company, suggesting inconsistent quality control or training standards.
• RECENCY BIAS: The majority of highly positive reviews are from the past 6 months (2025), while older reviews (2014-2022) contain more critical feedback about pricing and service quality. This temporal distribution warrants caution in interpreting the overall score.

This WW Score of 82.3 is reliable for assessing professionalism and technical competence, which are consistently praised across 187+ mentions, but should be interpreted cautiously regarding pricing fairness—the 72.1 pricing score reflects genuine and recurring customer concerns documented across a decade of reviews, and potential review manipulation in recent submissions reduces confidence in the most recent data.

Steele Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across professionalism, project completion, and technical experience, with consistently positive feedback on responsiveness, punctuality, and workmanship quality. The company excels at handling complex plumbing challenges and maintains high customer satisfaction. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness, with multiple customers explicitly citing high costs relative to competitors, though most acknowledge the work quality justifies the expense. The WW Score of 82.3 reflects a reliable, professional contractor with excellent execution but premium pricing that may not suit budget-conscious customers.

• Pricing concern: 8 mentions of high/expensive pricing across reviews. While quality is praised, cost is a consistent friction point. Three reviews (2024-08-16, 2023-09-16, 2012-11-04) explicitly flag pricing as problematic or excessive.
• Service quality inconsistency: One 2023 review alleges predatory pricing toward elderly customer ($275 initial visit, then $1200 quote for faucet replacement). Another 2015 review describes poor callback service and unhelpful phone staff. These suggest occasional lapses in customer care despite overall strong reputation.
• Older review concentration: 15 of 40 reviews are from 2019 or earlier (pre-2020). Recent reviews (past 12 months) are predominantly 5-star with high praise, which may reflect selection bias or improved operations. Recency-weighted analysis shows stronger recent performance.
• One scheduling/communication failure (2020-01-23): Customer reported being scheduled but not in system, resulting in missed appointment and unprofessional phone interaction. This contradicts the otherwise strong professionalism scores.

This WW Score of 82.3 is highly reliable, based on 40 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions. Steele Plumbing is a competent, professional contractor with proven technical expertise and strong project completion rates, but customers should expect premium pricing and should clarify scope and costs upfront to avoid disputes.

Maplewood Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven by consistently high marks in professionalism (86.5), experience (85.5), and project completion (84.0). The company excels at punctuality, communication, technical knowledge, and job follow-through, with extensive evidence across 127+ professionalism mentions and 98+ experience mentions. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (71.0), with 42 mentions revealing customer concerns about high service call fees ($65–$150 for estimates), steep labor rates, and tiered pricing structures that lack transparency. While most recent reviews (past 12 months) are highly positive, older reviews and several detailed complaints highlight recurring issues with cost clarity and occasional service lapses.

• PRICING TRANSPARENCY ISSUE: Multiple reviews (2020–2024) cite surprise high bills, lack of upfront cost disclosure, and tiered pricing presented on-site without prior ballpark estimates. This pattern suggests a systemic pricing communication problem.
• INCONSISTENT SERVICE DELIVERY: Several 1-star reviews document missed appointments, no-shows without notification, failure to follow up on estimates, and rude phone interactions. These incidents are scattered across 2016–2024, indicating occasional but recurring operational lapses.
• QUALITY CONTROL VARIANCE: One detailed 1-star review (2025-04-07) describes multiple rework cycles, poor concrete finishing, and dismissive customer service on a major sewer line replacement. Another (2023-08-14) documents incomplete work and false documentation ('FLOW IS RESTORED' when problem persisted).
• FAKE REVIEW RISK—MODERATE: 4 reviews contain only ratings with no text (5.0 stars, 2025-06-08, 2025-06-05, 2025-06-03, and others). Additionally, 2–3 reviews use nearly identical phrasing ('Always efficient and knowledgeable' appears twice verbatim on 2025-06-09 and 2025-06-06). While not conclusive, this warrants caution.
• RECENCY BIAS: Majority of reviews are from past 12 months (June 2024–June 2025), with a concentration of 5-star reviews in this period. Older reviews (2010–2020) show more balanced feedback and pricing complaints, suggesting either improved service or review selection bias.
• PRICING COMPLAINTS CONCENTRATED: 8+ reviews explicitly criticize pricing as too high, unfair, or opaque. Several mention $400–$1,150 charges for minor work (faucet replacement, small repairs). This is the single most consistent negative theme.

This WW Score of 82.1 is reliable for assessing Maplewood Plumbing's professionalism, experience, and project completion capabilities, which are supported by extensive high-confidence data (127+ professionalism mentions, 98+ experience mentions). However, the pricing dimension (71.0) should be weighted heavily in decision-making, as it reflects a genuine and recurring customer concern documented across 42 reviews spanning multiple years. Prospective customers should request detailed cost breakdowns and hourly rates before scheduling service. The company's responsiveness to complaints (evidenced by manager follow-ups in 2020 and 2025 reviews) is a positive sign, but the underlying pricing structure remains a significant differentiator.

Tony LaMartina Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance with a WW Score of 82.1, driven by consistently high marks in professionalism (87.5), project completion (85.0), and technical experience (86.0). The company excels at punctuality, communication, courteous staff, and quality workmanship, with extensive evidence across 128+ professionalism mentions and 89+ experience mentions. However, pricing emerges as a notable weakness (68.0), with multiple customers citing unexpectedly high quotes, service fees for estimates, and bills significantly exceeding competitor pricing. While most reviews are recent and highly positive (5-star ratings dominate), the pricing concerns are substantive and warrant caution for cost-sensitive customers.

• PRICING PATTERN DETECTED: Multiple reviews (at least 6 distinct complaints) cite pricing concerns including: $692.44 quote for simple faucet replacement, $517.44 overcharge vs. competitor, $560+ quote for kitchen faucet, $200/hour vs. $175/hour competitor rate, and general complaints of 'outrageous' and 'expensive' pricing. This is a legitimate and recurring issue, not isolated.
• FAKE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Approximately 40-50 reviews show near-identical phrasing and structure (e.g., 'Zack and Talon did a great job. They were fast and efficient' appears twice verbatim; the detailed gas leak review appears twice verbatim; multiple other reviews repeat with minor variations). This suggests potential review manipulation or bulk posting. Confidence in pricing dimension reduced accordingly.
• EMPTY REVIEWS: 9 reviews contain only a 5-star rating with no text. These provide no usable data and inflate apparent review count.
• RECENCY BIAS: Majority of reviews (approximately 100+) are dated 2025-04-07 to 2025-06-09, clustering in a narrow recent window. Older reviews (2013-2023) show more balanced feedback including legitimate complaints. Recent reviews are overwhelmingly 5-star with limited critical detail.
• BILLING/PAYMENT DISPUTES: Multiple reviews (at least 4) describe billing disputes, refusal to provide itemized labor/material breakdowns, and aggressive collection practices. One review mentions company hired a lawyer for payment collection.
• SERVICE QUALITY INCONSISTENCY: One detailed 2014 review documents multiple failed attempts to fix shower head and faucet issues, requiring 4 separate visits, double-charging, and incomplete work. Another 2013 review describes being handed off to another company without clear communication and charged premium rates for inferior service.

This WW Score of 82.1 should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution: while professionalism and technical competence are well-documented across a large sample, the apparent review manipulation (duplicate/near-identical reviews), clustering of recent 5-star reviews, and substantive pricing complaints from multiple independent sources suggest the overall score may be inflated. The pricing dimension (68.0) is the most reliable finding, as complaints span multiple years and are specific and detailed. Customers should expect professional service but should obtain written quotes and compare pricing with competitors before committing.

S&S Plumbing (Frank and Jeremy) demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent punctuality, excellent communication, and courteous service across 28 mentions. Technical expertise is solid with 15 mentions of skilled workmanship and problem-solving. Pricing is fair and transparent across 12 mentions, with customers noting reasonable rates and honest estimates. However, project completion shows vulnerability: 3 critical negative reviews document serious follow-through failures including unresolved callbacks, delayed service (month-long waits), and incomplete repairs, significantly lowering this dimension's score despite many positive completion mentions. The company's reliability is undermined by these documented service failures.

• CRITICAL: Three 1-star reviews (Sept 2024, Dec 2023, Jan 2024) document severe project completion failures: unresponsive to callbacks, month-long delays, and incomplete repairs not followed up. These are specific, detailed complaints with dates and context—not generic criticism.
• INCONSISTENCY: One 1-star review (Jan 2024) states 'very pleased' and 'good job' but rates 1.0—likely data entry error or rating system misuse, but content is positive.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Majority of reviews (24 of 36) are from June 2023 or earlier. Only 4 reviews from 2024 (1 positive Jan, 1 negative Sept, 2 positive Aug). Recent negative review from Sept 2024 suggests ongoing issues.
• POTENTIAL FAKE REVIEW PATTERN: Multiple reviews from June 10, 2023 (8 reviews) and June 7, 2023 (1 review) share similar structure and generic praise language ('professional,' 'on time,' 'highly recommend') with minimal specific detail. This clustering warrants caution but is not conclusive.
• BUSINESS STRUCTURE AMBIGUITY: Reviews reference 'Frank,' 'Jeremy,' 'FS Plumbing,' 'F&S,' and 'S&S Plumbing Systems' interchangeably, suggesting family operation or name variations. This complicates accountability assessment.

This score should be treated with MODERATE-TO-HIGH caution. While professionalism and experience scores are well-supported by 28 and 15 mentions respectively, the project completion dimension is severely compromised by three detailed, recent negative reviews documenting unresolved callbacks and incomplete work—a critical failure for a plumbing contractor. The clustering of positive reviews from mid-2023 and the presence of potential fake review patterns further reduce confidence. The 82.1 score masks a company with inconsistent follow-through that may not honor callbacks or complete work reliably.