Aj Danboise

AJ Danboise presents a deeply split profile across its review history. Professionalism scores moderately well because a large number of reviewers explicitly praise individual technicians as courteous, friendly, punctual, and communicative — however, this is significantly offset by a meaningful cluster of reviews citing rude office staff, missed or cancelled appointments, and poor scheduling foll... Read more

AJ Danboise presents a deeply split profile across its review history. Professionalism scores moderately well because a large number of reviewers explicitly praise individual technicians as courteous, friendly, punctual, and communicative — however, this is significantly offset by a meaningful cluster of reviews citing rude office staff, missed or cancelled appointments, and poor scheduling follow-through. Pricing is the single most damaging dimension: an overwhelming volume of reviews across many years explicitly describe prices as far above market rate, with numerous customers reporting they completed the same work themselves or through competitors for a fraction of the quoted cost; non-itemized invoices and a mandatory service call fee compound this perception. Project completion scores moderately, as most jobs described were ultimately finished, but there are notable exceptions including incomplete work, a callback required due to a faulty installation, and at least one case of abandoned or improperly completed work. Experience scores similarly to professionalism — many reviewers praise individual technicians as knowledgeable and skilled, but a recurring pattern of misdiagnosis, upselling unnecessary replacements, and at least one confirmed improper installation (AAV not to code) prevents a higher score. Read less