Find Nearby Plumbers In Elgin, Illinois

ABV Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, driven by a large and consistent body of reviews spanning 2019 through mid-2025. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, courteous behavior, use of shoe covers, mask compliance, and clear communication — including named technicians like Ivo, Hristo, and Wafiq receiving repeated individual praise. Project completion scores are high, with the vast majority of reviewers confirming jobs were finished cleanly, on time, and without callbacks needed, though two reviews (one involving an improper water heater install and one involving a refused service call) introduce minor deductions. Pricing is generally viewed favorably — multiple reviewers cited fair quotes, upfront pricing, and one notable instance where a plumber charged less than the agreed rate after a quick repair — but one 2-star review flagged a $245 labor-only quote as excessive, preventing a higher score. Experience scores well based on numerous mentions of skilled diagnostics, problem-solving on difficult jobs, and technical competence, though the 2021 water heater complaint (citing improper installation requiring a competitor to fix) is a meaningful negative data point that tempers the score.

• 8 reviews contain no text whatsoever — only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• A cluster of reviews dated 2025-05-10 (6 reviews on the same date) and 2025-04-10 (4 reviews on the same date) warrants mild scrutiny. However, the reviews contain varied language, specific technician names, and differing job types, suggesting they are likely legitimate Home Depot installation batch reviews rather than fabricated entries.
• One review (2021-08-04, 1 star) explicitly states ABV improperly installed a water heater and that a competitor had to fix it. This is a significant quality failure and was weighted accordingly in the Experience and Project Completion scores.
• One review (2022-06-09, 1 star) describes a refused service call for an outdoor spigot, citing unclear scope-of-work policies. This reflects a communication or service-scope issue rather than a workmanship failure.
• One review (2023-07-31, 2 stars) flagged a $245 labor-only quote for a one-hour faucet replacement as unreasonable. This was factored into the Pricing score.
• The majority of reviews are from 2024–2025 and are therefore within the recency window. Older reviews (2019–2021) are consistent in tone and were given slightly reduced weight per recency rules.
• Overall review sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (5-star), which is statistically unusual. However, the presence of specific names, job details, and a handful of genuine negative reviews reduces the likelihood of systematic fake review inflation.

This WW Score is based on 101 reviews with usable content spanning approximately six years, with strong recency representation, and carries HIGH overall confidence — though users should note the isolated but serious water heater installation complaint and the pattern of same-day review clusters when making a final hiring decision.

Scott Marhofke demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with explicit mentions of punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous demeanor across 42 reviews. Pricing receives strong marks with 28 reviews highlighting fair, reasonable, and transparent pricing with no upselling. Project completion is evidenced by 35 reviews detailing completed jobs, follow-up visits, and reliable service over many years. Experience is validated by 31 reviews emphasizing technical knowledge, quality workmanship, and problem-solving ability. The single 1-star review from June 2022 citing non-responsiveness is an outlier among 56 positive reviews and does not materially impact the overall score given the overwhelming evidence of reliability.

• Two reviews (dated 2024-06-09 and 2020-06-10) contain no text, only ratings—these were excluded from scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed
• Cluster of reviews from June 2023 and June 2022 with identical dates suggests possible batch posting, but review text varies significantly and contains specific project details, reducing concern about fabrication
• One negative review (2022-06-10, 1-star) citing communication failure stands in stark contrast to 56 positive reviews; however, this appears to be a genuine service failure rather than fake review pattern, as it contains specific details about multiple unanswered calls
• Review from 2017-01-17 references a previous plumber's poor work, which validates Scott's quality by comparison rather than suggesting fake praise
• No evidence of repetitive phrasing or suspiciously generic language; reviews contain specific project details (water heaters, faucets, pipes, sump pumps, etc.) and personal anecdotes

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 55 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions (28–42 mentions each), predominantly recent data (majority from 2019 onward), and consistent corroboration of claims across independent reviewers with specific project examples. The single negative review does not undermine confidence given the overwhelming positive pattern and its specific, credible complaint.

A Right Price Plumbing & Sewer Company, led primarily by Jordan, earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a substantial volume of reviews spanning several years. Professionalism is consistently praised — punctuality, friendliness, and responsiveness are mentioned repeatedly, with Jordan frequently arriving same-day or within the hour even on weekends and holidays. Pricing is described as fair, reasonable, and transparent across many reviews, with multiple reviewers explicitly noting honest quotes and no upselling. Project completion scores are high, with reviewers consistently reporting jobs finished quickly, completely, and correctly — including complex sewer line replacements completed within a single day with permits and inspections. Experience is well-supported, with reviewers citing correct diagnoses, skilled workmanship, and problem-solving ability; however, one 1-star review from 2020 describes two technicians who were unable to correctly diagnose a tankless water heater issue, which moderately tempers the experience and professionalism scores.

• One significant negative review (1-star, October 2020) describes missed appointment, unprofessional technician behavior, refusal to communicate findings, and an incorrect diagnosis — this is a meaningful outlier against an otherwise positive review set and has been factored into scoring.
• The majority of reviews are older than 12 months relative to the most recent review date (January 2024), with a heavy cluster between 2018–2021. Recency weighting was applied, giving more weight to the 2023–2024 reviews.
• Several reviews use similarly enthusiastic language and superlatives, but most include specific job details (sump pump, sewer line, water heater, etc.), reducing concern about fake reviews. No strong fake review pattern detected.
• One review (March 2016) contains no usable dimensional data beyond a generic positive statement and was excluded from dimensional scoring.

This WW Score is based on 29 reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions, making it a HIGH confidence assessment, though the presence of one detailed negative review and the age of a significant portion of the review base introduce a modest degree of uncertainty.

RTP Plumbing receives consistently strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the standout strength — reviewers repeatedly cite responsiveness, communication, punctuality, and polite demeanor across nearly every review. Pricing is praised explicitly in at least 8 reviews, with words like 'reasonable,' 'fair,' and 'beyond reasonable' appearing frequently, suggesting genuine value satisfaction. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing jobs finished efficiently, follow-through on parts ordering, and callbacks honored within 24 hours. Experience and technical knowledge are affirmed through references to problem-solving, asking the right diagnostic questions, and educating customers on their issues. The score is tempered slightly by the age distribution of reviews — roughly half are from 2017–2019 and reference a different technician (Robert), while more recent reviews reference Wes, introducing some uncertainty about consistency across personnel.

• PERSONNEL INCONSISTENCY: Reviews from 2017–2019 reference 'Robert Cedillo' as the owner/technician, while reviews from 2022–2023 reference 'Wes.' It is unclear whether these are the same business under different operators or a change in staff. This may affect score consistency across time periods.
• RECENCY CONCERN: 3 of 12 reviews are from 2017–2019, which is more than 4 years old. These were included in scoring but carry reduced real-world reliability for current service quality.
• ALL 5-STAR RATINGS: Every single review is rated 5.0 stars. While the review content is largely specific and credible, the absence of any negative or mixed feedback across 12 reviews warrants mild caution. No fake review pattern was definitively detected, but the uniformity is noted.
• SMALL SAMPLE SIZE: With only 12 total reviews, the dataset is functional but limited. Scores carry reasonable confidence but would benefit from a larger review base to be fully reliable.

This WW Score is moderately reliable — review content is specific and credible across most dimensions, but the small sample size, all-5-star uniformity, and personnel inconsistency between older and newer reviews introduce enough uncertainty that the score should be treated as a strong positive signal rather than a definitive benchmark.

MTZ Plumbing earns very strong marks across professionalism, project completion, and experience, with the overwhelming majority of reviewers explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courteous behavior, and thorough workmanship across a wide range of plumbing jobs. Project completion scores are high, with numerous reviews confirming jobs finished correctly the first time, callbacks honored, and even additional work completed at no extra charge. Experience is well-documented through technically complex jobs such as whole-house repiping, sewer line replacement, tankless water heater installation, and difficult cartridge extractions. Pricing is the weakest dimension: while many reviewers describe fair or reasonable pricing, three separate reviews (rated 1–3 stars) explicitly state that MTZ quotes came in significantly higher than competitors — in one case 5x higher and in another $6,100 more than the chosen alternative — which meaningfully suppresses the pricing score. The overall WW Score of 87.4 reflects a contractor with genuinely strong service delivery but inconsistent pricing competitiveness.

• PRICING CONCERN: At least 3 reviews (1-star, 1-star, 2-star) explicitly describe MTZ quotes as dramatically higher than competitors — one reviewer received a quote 5x higher than four other plumbers, another saved $6,100 by going elsewhere, and a third was quoted $7,000 vs. $1,200 from their regular plumber. This is a material and recurring concern that significantly impacts the pricing score.
• POSSIBLE FAKE OR LOW-QUALITY REVIEWS: Five reviews dated 2022-01-18 are extremely brief, generic, and lack any specific detail ('He is the best plumber. Never had problems.', 'Always recommend to friends, Someone you can trust, highly recommend.', 'Over all good experience. I have already recommended him to a friend.', 'They did a great job, really smart contractor and he did a real expert plumbing job.'). These reviews share the same date, are all 5-star, and contain no job-specific information. They were excluded from usable data counts for scoring purposes and flagged as potentially inauthentic.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews span 2020–2024, with a strong cluster in 2021–2023. Reviews from the past 12 months (late 2023–2024) remain consistently positive, suggesting no meaningful decline in service quality over time.
• ONE 3-STAR REVIEW noted excessive verbal warnings about payment even if unsuccessful, high after-hours pricing, and repeated upselling of an expensive dig option — a minor but notable pattern consistent with the pricing concerns raised in the 1-star reviews.

This WW Score is based on a large, diverse, and predominantly detailed review set spanning multiple years and technicians, giving HIGH confidence in the professionalism, project completion, and experience scores; however, the pricing score should be treated with caution given credible and specific complaints about significantly above-market quotes in multiple independent reviews.

Stan Halan demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions, with particularly strong marks for professionalism (89.5) driven by consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, courtesy, and communication. Project completion scores (88.0) reflect reliable follow-through and timely work delivery across numerous jobs. Experience and technical skill (87.5) are well-documented through detailed accounts of problem-solving, quality workmanship, and knowledge. Pricing (84.0) is consistently described as fair and reasonable, though some customers note occasional surprise at costs. The WW Score of 87.2 reflects a highly trustworthy contractor with strong performance across all measured dimensions.

• Two nearly identical 1-star reviews from July 31 and August 3, 2017 describe the same incident with extremely similar language and phrasing, suggesting possible duplicate or coordinated negative feedback. Both describe a phone interaction about a toilet repair with a shelf above it, with nearly word-for-word descriptions of alleged yelling and rudeness. This represents a significant departure from 125 other uniformly positive reviews and warrants skepticism.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews (125 of 127) are 5-star ratings with detailed, specific praise. While the positive reviews contain varied language and specific project details that suggest authenticity, the extreme concentration of perfect ratings is atypical and should be noted.
• Review dates span from 2012 to 2021, with most reviews concentrated in 2013-2017. Only 2-3 reviews are from 2020-2021, suggesting limited recent data. The two negative reviews are from 2017, making them 6+ years old.

This WW Score of 87.2 is highly reliable and should be trusted. It is based on 127 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (52-115 mentions per dimension), resulting in HIGH confidence across the board. The two negative reviews appear potentially coordinated or duplicative and are substantially outweighed by 125 consistently positive reviews with specific, detailed accounts of quality work. The contractor demonstrates genuine expertise and professionalism, though the lack of recent reviews (post-2020) means current performance cannot be fully assessed.