Find Nearby Plumbers In Boise City, Idaho

Waterworks Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with explicit mentions of excellent communication, trustworthiness, and a helpful attitude even beyond paid work. Experience is well-documented with references to quality workmanship, problem-solving, and use of premium materials. Project completion is evidenced by multiple jobs finished correctly on first attempt. Pricing receives positive feedback for transparency and fair value, though fewer reviews explicitly address cost. The overall WW Score of 88.3 reflects solid, reliable service with high customer satisfaction.

• Small sample size (5 reviews) limits statistical confidence; recommend reassessment once 10+ reviews are available
• All reviews are 5-star ratings with no negative feedback, which is atypical; however, reviews contain specific details (hot tub balancing, kitchen sink drain work, water heater replacement, hose bib replacement) that suggest authenticity rather than generic praise
• Most recent review is from October 2024, but three reviews are older than 2 years (2021, 2019, 2018); recency data is mixed
• No explicit mentions of punctuality, timeliness, or scheduling adherence in any review

This score should be treated with moderate caution due to the small sample size and absence of any negative reviews; the detailed, specific nature of customer feedback suggests genuine experiences, but a larger review pool would significantly strengthen confidence in this assessment.

Five Star Service Pros demonstrates strong performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with explicit mentions of prompt response, availability, prioritization, and courteous team behavior. Pricing receives strong marks with customers noting fair, transparent, and affordable rates with no hidden charges. Project completion is evidenced by successful main line clearing, water softener installation, and rapid problem resolution. Technical skill is supported by customer satisfaction with complex installations and efficient work. However, the analysis is based on only 4 reviews, all with perfect 5-star ratings, which limits confidence despite positive consistency.

• All 4 reviews are 5-star ratings with no critical feedback or complaints — this uniformity warrants caution
• Reviews contain some generic praise language ('amazing,' 'awesome,' 'wholeheartedly recommend') but also include specific details (main line clearing, water softener installation, hospital emergency response)
• Sample size is very small (n=4) — scores should be treated as preliminary and updated as more reviews accumulate
• Three of four reviews are from 2024 (recent), one from 2023 — recency is good but volume remains limited

This WW Score of 88.3 should be treated as a preliminary indicator based on limited data; while the consistency of positive feedback is encouraging, the small sample size (4 reviews) and absence of any critical perspectives mean this score has moderate reliability and should be updated as additional reviews are collected.

Alpha Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a large and mostly recent review pool. Professionalism is the most frequently cited strength, with dozens of reviewers praising punctuality, courteous technicians, and clear communication throughout the job. Project completion scores are solid but tempered by a meaningful cluster of negative reviews describing abandoned work, a no-show appointment, a flooded home caused by a technician error, unresolved callbacks, and at least one instance of work left incomplete requiring a second company. Pricing is generally viewed as fair and competitive, though several reviewers flagged unexpectedly high charges, billing for multiple trips, and one instance of a $670 faucet replacement that caused significant customer dissatisfaction. Experience scores well overall, with many reviewers citing skilled diagnosis and thorough workmanship, but a handful of reviews describe technicians who misdiagnosed problems, needed phone guidance mid-job, or failed to identify the correct source of a leak without customer insistence.

• DUPLICATE REVIEW PATTERN DETECTED: Six reviews dated 2025-06-04 through 2025-06-08 appear to be exact duplicates of six reviews dated 2025-06-03 through 2025-06-08 (e.g., 'Good communication, quick service. Highly recommend', 'Joe was awesome. Job was done quick...', 'Billy was very professional, helpful and prompt', etc.). These 6 duplicate entries were identified and excluded from scoring to avoid artificial inflation.
• FAKE REVIEW RISK: The duplicated reviews share identical text and were posted on consecutive days with different dates, which is a strong indicator of review manipulation or system error. Confidence in the review pool integrity is reduced accordingly.
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — PROJECT COMPLETION: Multiple reviews describe serious failures including: a technician flooding a home overnight (2017), a no-show appointment with no advance notice (2020), work abandoned mid-job with wall damage not repaired (2020), a callback dismissed with an implausible explanation ('turn handles in a fluid motion') leaving the original problem unresolved (2019), and a technician who left without diagnosing the correct leak source requiring a second visit (2019).
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — PROFESSIONALISM: At least two reviews describe rude or dismissive behavior from technicians or management, including one reviewer who reported being told to 'go f myself' by a manager after filing a BBB complaint (2022), and one installer who walked off a job without explanation (2024).
• NEGATIVE PATTERN — PRICING: At least three reviews cite pricing concerns including a $670 faucet replacement with charges for multiple supply runs (2020), a $600 trip charge quote (2019), and a customer charged a 2-hour minimum for a visit that produced no work (2020).
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews are from 2024-2025 and are overwhelmingly positive. Negative reviews are more evenly distributed across the full date range (2017-2024). The recent positive trend is noted but the historical negatives are factored into scoring.
• BLANK REVIEWS: Approximately 8 reviews contained no text and only a star rating. These were excluded from dimension scoring but counted in total reviews analyzed.
• GEOGRAPHIC AMBIGUITY: One review (2024-07-31) references 'Alpha Plumbing in Nampa' suggesting it may be for a different company with the same name. This review was treated with caution and given reduced weight.

This WW Score is based on a large review pool (232 total, ~210 usable) spanning over a decade, with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions; however, the detection of duplicate reviews suggesting possible manipulation, combined with a recurring pattern of serious project completion and professionalism failures in negative reviews, means the score should be treated as a reasonable but cautiously optimistic estimate of typical service quality rather than a guarantee of consistent performance.

Plumbing Solutions of Idaho earns strong marks for professionalism, with dozens of reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness — including same-day and after-hours service. Project completion is also well-supported, with many reviewers confirming jobs were finished on time, callbacks were honored, and technicians went above and beyond (including a remarkable engagement ring recovery). Experience and technical skill are consistently praised across a wide range of job types including repiping, gas lines, boilers, irrigation, and drain work. However, pricing is a meaningful drag on the overall score: multiple independent reviewers across different time periods explicitly describe costs as high, excessive, or significantly above competitor quotes — including one 1-star review alleging price gouging of a single female customer and one review citing a $306 charge for a $2.48 part. The pricing concern is not isolated and spans from 2014 to 2022, reducing confidence that pricing is fair or transparent across the board.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Approximately 18–20 reviews appear to be exact or near-exact duplicates (same text, same rating, same or adjacent dates). These have been counted once each for scoring purposes and flagged as likely platform import artifacts or submission errors rather than intentional fraud.
• BLANK/EMPTY REVIEWS: At least 8 reviews contain no text — only a star rating (all 5 stars). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable evidence.
• PRICING CONCERNS — MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT SOURCES: At least 6 distinct reviewers across 2014–2022 explicitly describe pricing as high, excessive, or significantly above market. One reviewer (2022) alleges potential price discrimination against a single female customer. One reviewer (2014) reports being overcharged and the underlying problem was not fixed. One reviewer (2015) reports partial work completion and refusal to return without additional payment. These are serious and recurring signals.
• RECENCY SKEW: The majority of detailed, substantive reviews are from 2025 and 2024. Reviews from 2014–2017 are heavily duplicated and many lack specifics. More weight has been given to post-2024 reviews per scoring rules.
• ONE REVIEW (undated) references 'Home Advisor' rather than the contractor directly — this may be a misattributed or platform-generic review and was treated with reduced weight.
• PARTIAL WORK / ABANDONMENT FLAG: One 1-star review (2015-02-22) from a self-identified general contractor explicitly states work was partially completed and the company refused to return without additional payment beyond the agreed quote. This is a serious project completion concern, though it appears isolated relative to the broader review set.

This WW Score is based on a large and diverse review set spanning over a decade, with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions; however, the pricing score reflects a genuine and recurring pattern of customer complaints about excessive costs that prospective customers should weigh seriously before hiring.

AG Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism and pricing being particular highlights. Dozens of reviewers praised courteous, punctual technicians and fair, transparent pricing — with one reviewer explicitly noting a quote of $185–$300 versus a competitor's $1,320 for the same job. Project completion scores are solid but tempered by two detailed 1-star reviews describing repeated failures on a tankless water heater installation, including improper part installation, a month-long wait for an $11 part, and a refusal to accept responsibility for faulty work. Experience scores are similarly strong in the majority of reviews but are pulled down by a 2-star review noting technicians who struggled to locate a hookup point and required supervisor assistance, and a 4-star review describing careless workmanship including damage to a bathtub. The overall picture is of a reliably competent local plumber with excellent customer service, but with a documented pattern of quality control issues on more complex or multi-visit jobs.

• 19 reviews contain no text whatsoever (blank, 'unknown', '.', or single-word entries) and were excluded from dimension scoring. Their star ratings were noted but provide no usable qualitative data.
• A significant portion of reviews predate 2020 — approximately 55 of 101 reviews are from 2013 or earlier. These older reviews carry reduced weight in scoring. The most recent reviews (2022–2024) remain consistently positive.
• Two separate 1-star reviews describe nearly identical complaints about the same tankless water heater installation — repeated failures, a month-long wait for a part, improper installation of a clip/elbow fitting, and refusal to accept responsibility. These appear to be written by two different members of the same household describing the same ongoing situation, which is worth noting but does not constitute fake review activity.
• No fake review patterns detected. Reviews vary meaningfully in length, detail, writing style, and sentiment. Negative reviews are specific and credible.
• The 1-star review from 2012 describing two missed appointments and complete disregard for scheduling is an isolated older incident but represents a meaningful professionalism failure that was factored into scoring.

This WW Score is based on a large, diverse, and largely credible review set spanning over a decade, with sufficient recent data to be considered reliable — however, users should note that complex or multi-visit jobs carry a documented risk of quality control issues based on multiple detailed negative accounts.

All Star Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions, with professionalism being the most frequently cited strength — dozens of reviews praise punctuality, courtesy, communication, and responsiveness including after-hours and emergency availability. Experience and workmanship are consistently highlighted across a wide range of job types including full repiping, sewer line replacement, water heater installs, and emergency leak repairs. Project completion is generally strong, with most reviewers reporting jobs finished on time and to satisfaction, though two negative reviews specifically cite a failed callback after a new water heater began leaking and a pattern of missed appointments — these meaningfully drag the completion score down. Pricing is viewed favorably by most reviewers, with several explicitly noting All Star beat competitor quotes, though one 2-star review alleged a significantly inflated estimate and one 1-star review described a $2,000+ quote for a water heater installation as predatory, introducing meaningful downward pressure on the pricing score.

• Seven reviews contain no text at all (labeled 'unknown' or blank) and were excluded from dimension scoring — they contribute only to total review count.
• The majority of highly positive reviews share similar phrasing patterns (prompt, courteous, professional, knowledgeable) which is common for genuine reviews in this industry but warrants mild caution.
• Two 1-star reviews and two 2-star reviews raise specific concerns: one describes a leaking water heater with no follow-up from the company, one describes repeated missed appointments and poor responsiveness from Jennifer, one alleges a technician lied about a shut-off valve to manufacture an emergency upsell, and one describes a $2,000+ water heater quote as predatory — these are credible negative signals and are factored into scoring.
• A significant portion of reviews (roughly 20+) are dated 2024-06-09 with identical timestamps, suggesting possible batch import or platform migration rather than organic posting — this does not necessarily indicate fake reviews but reduces confidence in the date accuracy of those entries.
• Many reviews are older than 3 years (2013–2021 range), which limits their relevance to current service quality. Recent reviews (2024–2025) are more heavily weighted in scoring.
• One review references 'All Stay Plumbing' and another 'All Start' — likely typos for the same company, treated as valid reviews.

This WW Score is based on a substantial volume of reviews with usable content and carries HIGH overall confidence, but should be interpreted with awareness that a small cluster of credible negative reviews — particularly around follow-through, appointment reliability, and one alleged upsell — indicate the company is not without meaningful service failures.