Krisako Construction

The reviews indicate a disparity in the quality of service provided by Krisako Construction. One reviewer had a highly negative experience involving a kitchen renovation, including apparent miscommunication regarding project scope, incorrect measurements, and an apparent lack of necessary tools that severely delayed the work. This reviewer expressed frustration regarding the inefficiency and skill... Read more

The reviews indicate a disparity in the quality of service provided by Krisako Construction. One reviewer had a highly negative experience involving a kitchen renovation, including apparent miscommunication regarding project scope, incorrect measurements, and an apparent lack of necessary tools that severely delayed the work. This reviewer expressed frustration regarding the inefficiency and skill level of the staff, exemplified by their observations of poor execution of tasks, such as improperly building a wall and failing to carry out basic tasks like removing a range hood. In contrast, the second review provides a strong endorsement, highlighting professionalism, punctuality, and satisfactory completion of work. This dichotomy suggests that the company may deliver varying levels of service depending on the crew assigned to a particular project. Common findings from both reviews include: - Communication Issues: The first review strongly emphasizes the lack of clarity and consistent messaging from the team. There is a suggestion that the project was not fully understood despite repeated explanations. - Delay and Time Management: The first reviewer specifically notes late arrivals and drawn-out timelines, which raises concerns about scheduling and efficiency. - Variability in Quality: The divergent experiences hint at inconsistency in the skill levels of the workers, as evidenced by one reviewer Read less