Handyman AT UR Service

The reviews depict a troubled relationship between clients and Terry Whitlock, with multiple instances of clients feeling deceived and financially exploited. A significant point of contention is the failure to complete contracted work despite substantial upfront payments. One review mentions a staggering $3,000 paid for a shed that remains unbuilt after a year, leading to an emotional toll on the ... Read more

The reviews depict a troubled relationship between clients and Terry Whitlock, with multiple instances of clients feeling deceived and financially exploited. A significant point of contention is the failure to complete contracted work despite substantial upfront payments. One review mentions a staggering $3,000 paid for a shed that remains unbuilt after a year, leading to an emotional toll on the client who sought legal recourse after repeated unsuccessful attempts to regain their investment. Another reviewer notes a payment of over $1,500 for roofing work that was poorly executed, emphasizing the unprofessionalism seen in Whitlock's approach. The sentiment is amplified by the claim of a lack of basic tools,which is particularly alarming considering the nature of the work being performed. Customers express frustration with unresponsive communication, indicating a trend where Whitlock actively avoids accountability or engagement once payment has been secured. Moreover, the mention of a felony warrant adds a layer of seriousness and can instill fear in potential clients, making them wary of engaging in business with someone accused of theft. Overall, the analysis indicates severe deficiencies in service delivery and ethics, along with a growing reputation in the community that clients are strongly advised to be cautious of. The recurring themes present an alarming portrait of neglect and dishonesty, signaling a clear need for potential customers to thoroughly reconsider their choice before hiring Handyman AT UR Service. Read less