Find Nearby Plumbers In San Jose, California

Nelson Plumbing earns a strong WW Score of 88.4 driven by an overwhelming volume of detailed, specific, multi-year reviews praising professionalism, punctuality, honest pricing, and skilled workmanship across a wide range of jobs from minor repairs to full whole-house copper repiping. Pricing is a standout dimension, with dozens of reviewers explicitly noting that Nelson beat competitor quotes by significant margins, honored original estimates, and in several cases charged less than quoted. Project completion is also very strong, with numerous callbacks honored at no charge and complex multi-day jobs completed on time and to code. A small but notable cluster of negative reviews — primarily from 2010–2016 — cite a specific technician (Bryan Nelson) for no-shows, poor workmanship, and failure to warranty work, and two additional reviews flag unresponsive customer service and a rude callback, which modestly temper the otherwise excellent scores. The business appears to have improved significantly in recent years, with post-2020 reviews being almost uniformly positive and highly detailed.

• NEGATIVE REVIEWS PRESENT: At least 6 reviews rated 1–2 stars cite serious issues including repeated no-shows, abandoned work, leaking post-repair installations, rude phone interactions, and failure to return calls for estimates. These appear to reference specific individuals (Bryan Nelson) and an older era of the business, but are factored into project completion and professionalism scores.
• TECHNICIAN INCONSISTENCY: Negative reviews reference 'Bryan Nelson' specifically for poor scheduling, rushed work, and refusal to warranty repairs. This suggests quality may have varied by technician, particularly in the 2012–2014 period. Recent reviews do not mention Bryan and are consistently positive.
• RECENCY NOTE: The majority of reviews span 2009–2025. Reviews from 2009–2016 include both the strongest praise (Carrie/PJ/Richard for repiping) and the most serious complaints (Bryan). Post-2020 reviews are overwhelmingly positive with no 1-star reviews, suggesting meaningful improvement in service consistency.
• TWO BLANK REVIEWS: Two reviews contain no text (only a star rating of 5.0 and 4.0). These were excluded from dimension scoring as they provide no usable data.
• MILD FAKE REVIEW CONCERN: A small number of very short, generic 5-star reviews with no detail (e.g., 'Great Service!!!', 'Unbelievably fast and reliable thank you', 'Very good overall experience') were noted. These are a minor concern and do not appear to constitute a coordinated pattern given the large volume of highly specific, detailed reviews. Confidence is not materially reduced.
• ONE REVIEW REFERENCES A DIFFERENT COMPANY: One review mentions 'Alfred Williams Plumbing' as the actual service provider, not Nelson Plumbing. This review was treated as a referral/recommendation context and not scored as direct Nelson Plumbing service data.
• LATENESS NOTED: One 4-star review (2023) explicitly states technicians were 'majority of the time late' and prices were 'higher than other plumbers,' providing a minor counterpoint to the dominant narrative on punctuality and pricing.

This WW Score of 88.4 is highly reliable and should be trusted with strong confidence, as it is based on one of the largest review sets analyzed, with the vast majority of reviews being detailed, specific, and spanning over 15 years — the negative reviews are real, factored in, and appear concentrated in a specific historical period and technician, while the recent track record is consistently excellent.

Chandler's Plumbing demonstrates consistently strong performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is a clear strength, with 127 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and communication—customers frequently praise same-day service and quick response times. Pricing receives strong marks (86.0) from 68 mentions, with customers consistently noting competitive, fair, and transparent pricing with no hidden charges. Project completion is solid (87.8) across 115 mentions, with most jobs finished on time and to customer satisfaction, though a few reviews mention minor follow-up issues or scheduling delays. Experience and technical skill are well-documented (88.2 across 89 mentions), with customers praising knowledgeable technicians and quality workmanship. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects a reliable, professional contractor with strong execution across all service dimensions.

• DUPLICATE REVIEWS DETECTED: Significant number of identical or near-identical reviews appear multiple times in the dataset (e.g., the tree roots water line review appears twice on consecutive dates; shower valve emergency review appears 3 times with minor variations; multiple reviews from 2022-06-07 appear to be batch-uploaded). This inflates mention counts and may not represent independent customer experiences.
• SUSPICIOUS REVIEW CLUSTERING: Approximately 80+ reviews share the exact date of 2022-06-07, suggesting a bulk upload or data migration event rather than organic review accumulation. This reduces confidence in recency assessment.
• MINOR NEGATIVE REVIEWS PRESENT: A small number of 1-2 star reviews (approximately 4-5 reviews) cite issues with cleanliness, incomplete work, unclear pricing, and installation errors. These are legitimate concerns but represent a small minority (~2% of total reviews).
• RECENCY BIAS: Most recent reviews (2024-2025) are overwhelmingly 5-star with detailed positive feedback. Older reviews (2022-2023) show more variation in ratings (including some 3-4 star reviews with constructive criticism). This pattern is typical but worth noting.
• GENERIC PRAISE IN SOME REVIEWS: A subset of reviews contain minimal detail (e.g., 'Amazing!!', 'Good service', 'NOTHING NEGATIVE TO SAY!') which limits ability to assess specific dimensions, though these are in the minority.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable for overall contractor quality assessment, supported by 227 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (68-127 mentions each). However, the significant duplication of reviews and clustering of reviews on a single date (2022-06-07) suggests the dataset may not represent fully independent customer experiences, which moderately reduces confidence in the precision of the score. The contractor's actual performance is likely in the 85-90 range; the score should be trusted for general quality assessment but not treated as a precise measurement. Recent reviews (2024-2025) show consistently high satisfaction, indicating current service quality is strong.

Angel's business demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with 87 mentions highlighting responsiveness, punctuality, courteous demeanor, and clear communication. Project completion is the strongest dimension with 95 mentions showing same-day or next-day service, thorough work, warranty follow-up, and proactive problem-solving. Pricing receives strong marks from 52 mentions emphasizing competitive quotes, fair pricing, and no hidden charges. Technical expertise is evident across 68 mentions demonstrating deep knowledge of water heaters, diagnostic skills, and quality workmanship. The single 1-star review citing quote validity concerns is an outlier among overwhelmingly positive feedback.

• One negative review (1-star, dated 2023-10-27) regarding quote validity period (half-day deadline) stands in stark contrast to 100 five-star reviews. This appears to be a legitimate service policy disagreement rather than quality issue.
• Approximately 20 reviews lack specific dates (listed as 'None'), making recency assessment incomplete for that subset. However, dated reviews span from 2020 to 2024, showing consistent performance over 4+ years.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected. Reviews contain specific details (model numbers, installation times, crew names, problem-solving examples), varied language patterns, and realistic scenarios including minor complaints about policy rather than generic praise.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 100 usable reviews with strong data density across all dimensions (52-95 mentions each). The consistency of positive feedback over 4+ years, specific technical details in reviews, and the presence of one legitimate policy disagreement (rather than quality complaint) all support confidence in this assessment.

Shawn (The Handyman Plumber) demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is his strongest area, with 72 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, communication, and courteous demeanor. Project completion is consistently strong with 65 mentions of finished work, timely delivery, and follow-through on callbacks. Experience is well-documented with 58 mentions of skilled workmanship, problem-solving ability, and technical knowledge. Pricing receives solid marks with 48 mentions of fair, transparent, and reasonable rates. The overwhelming majority of reviews (80 of 87) are 5-star ratings with specific, detailed praise. Only 4 negative reviews exist, primarily citing scheduling unavailability or parking constraints rather than quality issues.

• Review age distribution: Majority of reviews (approximately 65%) are from 2010-2017, with only 22 reviews from 2018 onwards. Most recent substantive reviews are from 2023. Consider recency weighting.
• Two 1-star reviews (2020-09-25, 2016-11-15) and one 1-star review (2014-10-28) cite unavailability/scheduling issues rather than work quality, suggesting capacity constraints during peak periods.
• One 1-star review (2011-08-21) cites parking inconvenience as reason for refusal to service, indicating potential service area limitations.
• One 3-star review (2017-11-29) mentions difficulty reaching the contractor despite multiple attempts, though no quality complaint is stated.
• One 4-star review (2014-06-19) notes pricing was higher than expected but acknowledges excellent work quality.
• One 4-star review (2013-01-11) mentions feeling slightly overcharged on one occasion.
• One defensive 5-star review (2016-07-28) appears to be written in response to negative reviews, defending the contractor's right to refuse work, which may indicate some reputation management.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected. Reviews show consistent, specific details about actual work performed (garbage disposals, water heaters, drains, valves, etc.) with varied language and genuine customer experiences.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 87 reviews with strong data across all four dimensions (all with HIGH confidence). The contractor demonstrates consistent excellence in professionalism and experience, with solid performance in project completion and fair pricing. However, the score should be interpreted with awareness that most reviews are 3-7 years old, and recent reviews (2023) suggest the contractor may have capacity constraints that could affect scheduling availability. The few negative reviews reflect service limitations rather than quality deficiencies, which is a favorable indicator of actual work quality.

Henthorn Plumbing, led by owner Matt Henthorn, demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. Professionalism is consistently praised with 87 mentions highlighting punctuality, courteous communication, responsiveness, and clean work practices. Project completion is strong with 78 mentions confirming jobs finished on time, problems solved completely, and callbacks honored. Experience is well-documented across 68 mentions showing skilled diagnostics, technical knowledge, and problem-solving ability. Pricing receives solid marks with 42 mentions noting fair quotes, transparency, and value relative to competitors. The single 1-star review from October 2018 citing non-responsiveness is an outlier among 99 five-star reviews and appears to reflect a temporary communication issue rather than systemic failure.

• One duplicate review detected (April 20, 2016 tankless water heater review appears twice with identical text), suggesting possible data entry error rather than fake review
• One minimal review (April 29, 2015) contains only a period with 5-star rating—insufficient data but does not suggest fraud
• One negative review (October 26, 2018, 1-star) stands in stark contrast to 99 five-star reviews; however, it is specific and credible (non-responsiveness to multiple contact attempts), not generic praise, and appears isolated to a specific time period
• High concentration of 5-star reviews (99 of 100) is notable but justified by consistent, specific praise across multiple dimensions with detailed examples rather than generic language
• Most reviews are older than 12 months; only 5 reviews from past 12 months (August 2024, February 2024, and three from 2023). Recent data is limited, though no negative trend is evident in older reviews

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 100 reviews with strong mention counts across all dimensions (42–87 mentions per dimension). The consistency of specific, detailed praise across nearly two decades of reviews, combined with only one credible negative review addressing a specific communication lapse, supports confidence in this score. However, the limited number of recent reviews (past 12 months) suggests monitoring current service quality going forward.

San Jose Drain and Main, led by Giovanni, demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions. The business excels in professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness across 78 reviews. Project completion is highly reliable with 81 mentions of jobs finished completely, on-time delivery, and follow-through on callbacks and warranties. Pricing is a significant strength with 62 explicit mentions of fair, competitive, and transparent pricing—often described as significantly lower than competitors. Technical expertise is evident across 68 reviews highlighting skilled diagnostics, problem-solving, and quality workmanship. The overwhelming majority of reviews are recent (within the past 12 months), providing strong current-state confidence.

• Two negative or mixed reviews detected (1-star and 3-star ratings from Oct 2023 and Jun 2022) citing scheduling/communication failures and abrupt phone service, which slightly temper the otherwise perfect 5-star pattern but do not materially alter the overall score given the large sample size of 91 usable reviews.
• All 91 positive reviews are 5-star ratings with consistent, specific praise (not generic). No evidence of fake review patterns detected—reviews contain unique details, specific job descriptions, and varied language.
• Review recency is strong: 85+ reviews from the past 12 months (Nov 2023 onwards), with only 6 reviews older than 1 year. This ensures the WW Score reflects current business performance.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable and should be trusted as a strong indicator of contractor quality. It is based on 91 usable reviews with HIGH confidence across all four dimensions, supported by recent data, specific evidence, and minimal negative feedback.