Find Nearby Plumbers In San Jose, California

Gomez Plumbing demonstrates strong performance across all four dimensions, with particularly high marks for professionalism (89.5) and technical expertise (90.0). The company excels in communication, punctuality, and responsiveness, with 72 reviews explicitly praising professional conduct. Pricing is consistently described as fair and reasonable (86.0 across 48 mentions), with customers frequently noting competitive quotes and transparent billing. Project completion scores 85.5 based on 61 mentions, though this dimension shows the most variability due to a small number of significant failures (3 reviews citing no-shows or incomplete work). Technical skill and problem-solving ability are highly regarded across 58 reviews. The overall WW Score of 88.2 reflects a reliable, trustworthy contractor with strong execution, though occasional scheduling and follow-through issues prevent a higher rating.

• Three significant negative reviews (1-star and 2-star ratings from 2021-2022 and 2020) document serious project completion failures: no-shows despite confirmed appointments, abandoned jobs, and incomplete repairs requiring customer follow-up. These are not isolated complaints but represent systemic scheduling/accountability issues during that period.
• One 4-star review (2022-02-16) indicates incomplete work with promised callback never fulfilled after one week, suggesting potential follow-through gaps.
• One 3-star review (2021-04-27) documents repeated no-shows and lack of communication despite confirmed appointments.
• One 2-star review (2020-07-15) describes improper installation of garbage disposal hose leading to backups and leaks, with promised callback appointments not honored.
• The overwhelming majority of reviews (83 of 87) are 5-star ratings, which combined with the specific nature of negative reviews, suggests the company may have improved operations significantly after 2021-2022 period. However, the pattern of scheduling failures and incomplete callbacks in earlier reviews warrants caution.
• No evidence of fake reviews detected; reviews contain specific details, varied writing styles, and realistic problem descriptions across different time periods.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable based on 87 reviews with consistent data across all dimensions, but should be interpreted with awareness that the company experienced documented scheduling and follow-through failures in 2020-2022 that appear to have been resolved in more recent reviews (2023-2024 show no such issues). Current customers can expect strong professionalism and technical expertise, but those considering the company should note its historical accountability gaps.

SAS Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all measured dimensions, with particularly strong marks for professionalism (91.0) and experience (90.0). Sebastian and his team are consistently praised for punctuality, communication, responsiveness, technical knowledge, and quality workmanship. Project completion is reliable at 89.0, with multiple reviews confirming jobs finished on time and to specification. Pricing shows the only relative weakness at 76.5, driven by two detailed negative reviews citing lack of transparency on material costs and pricing significantly higher than competitors, though the majority of reviews praise fair and competitive pricing. The overwhelming volume of recent 5-star reviews (most from 2024-2025) with specific, detailed praise suggests genuine customer satisfaction rather than generic endorsements.

• Two substantive 1-star reviews from 2021 citing pricing concerns and lack of transparency on material costs—these represent legitimate customer grievances that warrant attention despite the predominantly positive profile
• High concentration of 5-star reviews with minimal detail (empty review text fields, 2-3 word reviews) suggests some reviews may lack depth, though this does not necessarily indicate fakery
• One review (2021-07-03) explicitly accuses Sebastian of dishonesty regarding pricing and quotes; reviewer provided photographic evidence of competing quote ($9k vs. $14k), lending credibility to the complaint
• Recency bias present: 60+ reviews are from 2024-2025, with only 15 reviews prior to 2024; older reviews (2019-2021) show more balanced feedback including the two negative reviews

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable for professionalism, project completion, and experience dimensions, supported by 48-58 mentions each with consistent positive feedback. However, the pricing score of 76.5 should be treated with caution—while most reviews praise fair pricing, two credible negative reviews document specific pricing transparency issues and significantly higher quotes than competitors, suggesting potential inconsistency in pricing practices or communication. Prospective customers should request detailed material cost breakdowns upfront.

Charley's Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all dimensions, with particularly strong marks for professionalism (92.0) and technical expertise (90.0). The contractor consistently receives praise for responsiveness, punctuality, clear communication, and honest business practices. Project completion is solid (85.0), with customers noting timely work and follow-through on callbacks. The single negative review (1-star from April 2024) citing poor workmanship and dismissive attitude toward mistakes creates meaningful balance against the overwhelmingly positive feedback. Most reviews are recent (within past 3 years), with 47 of 87 from 2021 onward, providing strong current relevance.

• One significantly negative review (1-star, April 2024) contradicts the overwhelmingly positive pattern, citing multiple installation errors (shower valves, flange, supply lines, garbage disposal leak) and dismissive contractor response. This suggests either a genuine service failure or a legitimate customer complaint that warrants attention.
• The review corpus is heavily skewed toward 5-star ratings (85 of 87 reviews are 5-star). While individual reviews contain specific details and vary in language, the near-universal perfection is atypical and may indicate selection bias in the review platform or customer base.
• Several reviews use similar phrasing patterns ('honest,' 'professional,' 'responsive,' 'knowledgeable') but this appears consistent with genuine customer experience rather than fabricated reviews, as specific project details vary widely.
• Recency note: 54 reviews are from 2021 or later; 33 are from 2019-2020. Only 1 review is from 2024 (the negative one), which may not fully represent current service quality.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable for assessing typical service quality, supported by 86 usable reviews with consistent evidence across all dimensions. However, the single recent negative review (April 2024) introduces material uncertainty about current consistency and warrants direct investigation before engaging for major projects. The score reflects strong historical performance but should be tempered by awareness of the recent complaint.

Integrity Plumbing demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions with consistently high marks. Professionalism is the strongest area (89.5), with 68 reviews explicitly praising punctuality, communication, courtesy, and responsiveness. Project completion scores 87.0 across 65 mentions, reflecting reliable job finishing and follow-through, though two negative reviews document no-shows and scheduling failures. Pricing is fair and transparent (84.0 across 32 mentions), with customers frequently noting competitive rates and honest assessments. Experience is strong (88.5 across 58 mentions), with extensive praise for technical knowledge, problem-solving, and quality workmanship. The WW Score of 88.2 reflects a highly trustworthy contractor with demonstrated reliability.

• Two negative reviews (3.0 and 2.0 ratings) document serious scheduling failures and no-shows, which directly contradict the overwhelmingly positive narrative. These incidents occurred in Feb 2021 and Oct 2021, suggesting potential past operational issues that may or may not have been resolved.
• Review volume is heavily skewed toward 5-star ratings (78 of 80 reviews). While not necessarily fake, this extreme concentration warrants caution—typical contractor review distributions show more variance.
• One review (2021-02-15) explicitly states the contractor misdiagnosed a problem and avoided the job rather than being honest about the error, raising concerns about diagnostic transparency.
• Most reviews are 2-3+ years old (majority from 2020-2022). Only 8 reviews are from 2024. Recent performance data is limited.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable for assessing typical professionalism and experience, supported by 58-68 mentions per dimension. However, the score should be tempered by documented scheduling failures and the heavily skewed 5-star distribution; prospective customers should verify current operational practices and confirm scheduling reliability before committing to major projects.

Silicon Valley Plumbing (Frank) demonstrates exceptional performance across all four dimensions with strong evidence from 66 usable reviews. Professionalism is the strongest pillar, with 54 mentions highlighting punctuality, responsiveness, politeness, and clear communication—Frank consistently responds within minutes and arrives on time or early. Pricing receives strong marks (42 mentions) with customers repeatedly noting competitive, fair, and transparent quotes with no hidden charges or upselling. Project completion is solid (51 mentions) with customers reporting jobs finished on time, callbacks honored, and follow-through on complex issues. Experience is well-documented (38 mentions) with praise for technical knowledge, problem-solving ability, and quality workmanship across diverse plumbing challenges. The single 1-star review from March 2023 alleging overcharging and poor workmanship is substantially outweighed by 65 positive reviews and appears to be an outlier.

• One negative review (1-star, March 30, 2023) alleges overcharging and poor workmanship with a used handle that failed within weeks. This contrasts sharply with the overwhelming positive feedback but is treated as a legitimate outlier rather than evidence of systemic issues.
• Another 1-star review (September 18, 2024) describes inadequate camera inspection technique and a $8k quote that was later determined unnecessary. This suggests potential diagnostic errors in specific cases, though the reviewer did obtain a second opinion and resolved the issue elsewhere.
• The vast majority of reviews (65 of 67) are 5-star ratings. While this could suggest fake reviews, the reviews contain highly specific, varied details about different plumbing jobs, different dates, different issues, and different customer circumstances. Language varies naturally across reviews. No suspicious repetitive phrasing patterns detected. The consistency appears genuine rather than fabricated.
• Most reviews are from the past 12 months (approximately 50+ reviews from 2024 and late 2023), providing strong recency weighting.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable, based on 66 usable reviews with strong mention counts across all four dimensions (38-54 mentions each), all achieving HIGH confidence. The score reflects genuine customer satisfaction with consistent praise for responsiveness, fair pricing, quality work, and professional demeanor, though two isolated negative reviews suggest occasional diagnostic or pricing issues warrant awareness.

Fuse Plumbing demonstrates strong overall performance across all measured dimensions. Professionalism is a standout strength with 48 mentions highlighting punctuality, communication, politeness, and responsiveness—technicians consistently arrive on time, provide clear explanations, and maintain respectful demeanor. Project completion is equally robust with 45 mentions confirming jobs are finished thoroughly, callbacks are honored, and follow-up work is completed. Experience scores well with 32 mentions of skilled workmanship, technical knowledge, and problem-solving ability. Pricing shows solid value with 13 mentions of fair quotes and competitive rates, though fewer explicit price comparisons limit confidence in this dimension. One negative review (1-star) citing lack of free estimates and office communication issues is an outlier among overwhelmingly positive feedback.

• Review pattern shows 54 of 56 reviews are 5-star ratings with one 4-star and one 1-star, creating a heavily skewed distribution. While most reviews contain specific details (technician names, job types, outcomes), the concentration of perfect ratings warrants caution about potential selection bias or review filtering.
• Most reviews (49 of 56) are from 2024, with only 7 reviews from 2023 or earlier. Recency is strong but limits historical perspective on consistency.
• One review (2024-08-17) initially rated 4-star due to issues with broken product and post-installation toilet problems, but was updated to reflect successful resolution. This demonstrates responsiveness but also indicates occasional quality control issues with third-party products.
• The single 1-star review (2023-04-14) is vague and does not describe actual service experience, making it difficult to assess validity. It may reflect policy disagreement rather than service quality.

This WW Score of 88.2 is highly reliable due to strong mention counts across three dimensions (professionalism, project completion, experience all 5+ mentions) and consistent positive feedback with specific details. However, the extreme concentration of 5-star ratings (96% of reviews) suggests potential selection bias; the true score may be slightly lower in real-world conditions. The pricing dimension is less certain due to only 13 mentions. Overall, Fuse Plumbing appears to be a trustworthy, professional service provider, but prospective customers should independently verify pricing competitiveness.