Find Nearby Plumbers In Tucson, Arizona

Avra-Marana Pumping receives consistently strong feedback across all four scored dimensions from a small but coherent set of reviews. Professionalism is the standout dimension, with all four reviewers explicitly praising responsiveness, courtesy, punctuality, and friendly communication. Pricing is highlighted positively in three reviews, with multiple customers noting they were more affordable than competitors and that Mike actively discouraged unnecessary upsells. Project completion is well-supported, with reviewers describing prompt arrivals, efficient work, and jobs completed as promised. Experience is noted in three reviews through references to knowledgeable advice, thorough inspections, and helpful guidance that saved customers money — indicating genuine technical competence rather than just surface-level service.

• Small sample size of only 4 reviews — all ratings are 5-star, which warrants mild caution, though the reviews contain specific details, varied language, and distinct scenarios that reduce the likelihood of fabrication.
• Two of the four reviews are dated 2021, one is from 2022, and one from 2023 — no reviews are within the past 12 months relative to a 2024 evaluation date, meaning recency of feedback is limited and current performance cannot be confirmed.
• All reviews are positive with no negative or mixed feedback present — this may reflect genuine quality but also means no stress-test data exists for how the company handles problems or complaints.

This WW Score carries MODERATE reliability due to a small review pool of only 4 reviews, all of which are older than 12 months and unanimously positive — the score is directionally trustworthy but should be treated as a preliminary signal rather than a definitive assessment until more recent and varied reviews are available.

Foster Plumbing demonstrates solid performance across all dimensions with a WW Score of 82.3. Professionalism and project completion are well-supported by multiple reviews highlighting punctuality, communication, and thorough work. Pricing is perceived as fair and transparent. Technical skill and problem-solving ability are evident in reviews describing efficient repairs and quality workmanship. However, one significant 1-star review from 2015 citing a missed appointment without notification substantially impacts the professionalism score and overall confidence. Most positive reviews are older than 12 months, which limits recency validation.

• Recency concern: 5 of 7 reviews are older than 12 months (oldest from 2012). Only 1 review from 2024 and 1 from 2023. Recent performance cannot be fully validated.
• One critical negative review (1-star, 2015) citing missed appointment and no communication. This directly contradicts professionalism claims in other reviews and significantly impacts confidence in punctuality/responsiveness.
• Potential review age bias: Older reviews may not reflect current business practices or staffing.

This score should be treated with moderate caution. While the data shows generally positive performance, the small sample size (7 reviews), significant age of most reviews (5+ years old), and one serious professionalism failure create uncertainty about current reliability. Recent performance validation is needed.

Steve demonstrates strong professionalism with consistent praise for punctuality, responsiveness, and courteous demeanor across five reviews. Project completion is solid, with multiple reviews confirming jobs finished quickly and thoroughly, though one 2021 review raises serious legal concerns about unlicensed plumbing work that cannot be ignored. Pricing is described as reasonable and fair-value in three reviews. Technical skill is evident across diverse project types (electrical, plumbing, handyman work), though the licensing allegation creates material doubt about the legitimacy of some work performed.

• CRITICAL: One 1-star review (2021-01-05) alleges illegal plumbing work without proper licensing. This is a serious compliance and legal issue that directly contradicts claims of professionalism and experience in plumbing. This allegation significantly undermines overall trustworthiness.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Two of six reviews are from 2021 or earlier (33% of sample). Most positive reviews cluster in 2024, which may reflect selection bias or improved practices, but the licensing allegation from 2021 remains unresolved.
• PATTERN OBSERVATION: Five of six reviews are 5-star with highly positive language. While the 1-star review provides balance, the overwhelming positivity without specific technical details in some reviews warrants caution against over-confidence.

This score should be treated with MODERATE caution. While professionalism and project completion metrics are solid, the unaddressed 2021 allegation of unlicensed plumbing work is a material red flag that cannot be dismissed and suggests potential legal/compliance risks that customers should investigate independently before hiring for plumbing-related work.

Racy's Plumbing earns strong marks across all four dimensions based on a consistent pattern of positive feedback spanning many years. Professionalism is well-supported by multiple reviewers citing punctuality, same-day responsiveness, and courteous service. Experience and workmanship receive the highest praise, with several reviewers describing the plumbers as deeply knowledgeable and capable of solving problems others could not. Project completion is also well-regarded, with reviewers noting jobs were handled promptly and thoroughly across multiple visits over many years. Pricing is the one area of mild tension — while several reviewers call prices reasonable, two explicitly note the company is 'pricey' or does not offer discounts, which moderates the pricing score.

• RECENCY WARNING: Only 3 of 12 reviews are from the past 12 months (relative to mid-2024). The majority of reviews are 3–18 years old, which significantly limits confidence in reflecting current service quality.
• LOW REVIEW VOLUME: With only 12 total reviews, the dataset is small. Scores are directionally useful but should be interpreted cautiously.
• ONE UNINFORMATIVE REVIEW: 'Great - on all three jobs.' (2017) and 'A pleasant experience, as far as any plumbing adventure could be.' (2012) provide no scorable dimension data and were excluded from dimension scoring.
• NO FAKE REVIEW PATTERNS DETECTED: Reviews vary in length, specificity, and tone. Several mention specific plumbers by name (Racy, Chris), specific jobs, and even mild criticisms — these are positive authenticity signals.

This WW Score is directionally trustworthy given the consistency of feedback and authentic review signals, but should be treated with moderate caution due to the small review pool and the fact that most reviews are significantly older than 12 months.

Dunn Plumbing demonstrates strong professionalism with courteous, responsive staff and timely service delivery. Pricing is competitive and transparent with no pressure for unnecessary services. However, a critical 2022 inspection failure (missed a $1,800 valve issue) and a 2022 misdiagnosis significantly impact the experience and completion scores. The company shows good problem-solving and follow-through on emergency calls, but the inspection failures raise concerns about diagnostic accuracy. Most positive reviews are from 2020–2021; recent reviews reveal serious quality control issues.

• CRITICAL: Two recent failures (2022) involving missed diagnoses during inspections—one resulted in $1,800 in unexpected repairs and another required a refund. Both failures contradict the company's claimed expertise.
• RECENCY CONCERN: Most glowing reviews are from 2020–2021. The two most recent reviews (2022) are significantly negative, suggesting a possible decline in quality or consistency.
• INSPECTION RELIABILITY: Multiple independent inspectors confirmed the 2022 missed valve was 'impossible to miss,' indicating either inadequate training or negligence in diagnostic work.
• SAMPLE SIZE: Only 7 reviews total limits confidence in overall assessment. More recent data needed to determine if 2022 issues were anomalies or systemic.

This score should be treated with caution. While the company shows strong professionalism and pricing on routine repairs, the two recent inspection failures (2022) raise serious concerns about diagnostic accuracy and quality control that are not fully reflected in the overall score due to limited sample size. The trend from highly positive (2020–2021) to critical failures (2022) suggests potential deterioration in service quality.

Right On Plumbing receives strong praise across most dimensions, with multiple reviewers highlighting fair and transparent pricing, quality workmanship, and completed jobs with no recurring issues. Professionalism scores are tempered by one notable negative review describing a 35-minute late arrival with no proactive communication, which is a meaningful red flag given the small review pool. Project completion is consistently positive, with reviewers describing jobs finished same-day and problems fully resolved. Experience is well-supported by specific mentions of technical skill, multi-generational plumbing expertise, and successful resolution of complex problems. The overall picture is positive but the small review count and one clear professionalism failure prevent a higher score.

• Small review pool of only 8 reviews limits statistical reliability of all scores.
• Most reviews are from 2019–2020, with only one review from 2022. The score may not reflect current service quality — recency is a concern.
• One 1-star review explicitly describes a late arrival with no communication and dismissive text response, which meaningfully drags the professionalism score down.
• Several 5-star reviews use enthusiastic but somewhat generic praise (e.g., 'highly recommend', 'great job'). While not conclusively fake, specificity varies across reviews. No strong fake review pattern detected, but noted.
• One review (2020-01-15) is incomplete — the reviewer had not yet had the full work done and promised an update that was never posted. This review was counted for professionalism (on-time arrival noted) but not for project completion.

This WW Score carries MODERATE overall reliability due to the small and predominantly dated review pool; the score directionally suggests a competent and fairly priced contractor, but prospective customers should seek more recent references before making a hiring decision.